Vitamin D reduces COVID-19 risk: real-time meta-analysis of 371 studies (138 treatment studies and 233 sufficiency studies)
Vitamin D for COVID-19
Vitamin D for COVID-19
Highlights- Vitamin D reduces risk with very high confidence for mortality, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, viral clearance, and in pooled analysis, high confidence for progression, and low confidence for ventilation.
- Ongoing treatment with multiple doses is more effective than single bolus doses.
- Calcitriol/calcifediol and analogs are more effective than cholecalciferol.
- Emergent results matching biological mechanisms confirm efficacy: efficacy gradient across outcomes (p = 0.031), calcitriol/calcifediol vs. cholecalciferol (p = 0.033), continuous vs. bolus treatment (p = 0.000035), and acute treatment vs. chronic prophylaxis (p = 0.0042).
- Early treatment is more effective than late treatment.
- 8th treatment shown effective in October 2020, now with p < 0.0000000001 from 138 studies, recognized in 18 countries.
- Real-time updates and corrections with a consistent protocol for 227 treatments. Outcome specific analysis and combined evidence from all studies including treatment delay, a primary confounding factor.
Vitamin D COVID-19 early and late treatment studies
Media bias: vitamin D for COVID‑19
Media covered only 1% of studies showing significantly lower COVID-19 risk
Only 1 positive vitamin D study was covered
3 negative or inconclusive studies were covered
Vitamin D for COVID-19: meta-analysis results
Random-effects meta-analysis. Relative risk with 95% CI. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment studies
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment mortality results
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment mechanical ventilation results
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment ICU results
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment hospitalization results
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment case results
Vitamin D COVID-19 peer reviewed studies
Vitamin D COVID-19 sufficiency studies
Vitamin D COVID-19 Randomized Controlled Trials
Vitamin D COVID-19 Randomized Controlled Trials after exclusions
Vitamin D COVID-19 RCT mortality results
Vitamin D COVID-19 RCT ICU results
Vitamin D COVID-19 RCT hospitalization results
COVID-19 RCT vs. observational results from 6,000+ studies
Vitamin D RCTs missing in NIH analysis
reduces riskVitamin D
increases risk →
90% OF RCTs MISSING
Vitamin D RCTs missing in NICE analysis
reduces riskVitamin D
increases risk →
83% OF RCTs MISSING
Vitamin D COVID-19 studies comparing high vs. low doses
Vitamin D COVID-19 cholecalciferol vs. calcifediol/calcitriol & analogs studies
Vitamin D COVID-19 bolus vs. multiple dose studies
Vitamin D COVID-19 treatment studies after exclusions
Media bias: vitamin D for COVID‑19
Media covered only 1% of studies showing significantly lower COVID-19 risk
Only 1 positive vitamin D study was covered
3 negative or inconclusive studies were covered
Media covered only 0.8% of studies showing significantly lower COVID-19 risk
Only 5 positive studies were covered
one each: budesonide, cannabidiol, fluvoxamine, HCQ, vitamin D
34 negative studies were covered
HCQ 12, ivermectin 6, lopinavir/ritonavir 4, azithromycin 3, vitamin D 3, fluvoxamine 2, one each: ibuprofen, metformin, vitamin C, zinc
Media was 3.8× more likely to cover positive studies
19 positive studies were covered
paxlovid 5, remdesivir 3, casirivimab/imdevimab 2, convalescent plasma 2, molnupiravir 2, one each: antiandrogens, peginterferon lambda, sargramostim, tixagevimab/cilgavimab, tocilizumab
Only 6 negative studies were covered
remdesivir 3, one each: bamlanivimab/etesevimab, bebtelovimab, sotrovimab
| Evidence | Official Acknowledgment | Approx. Delay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrus Fruit (vitamin C) for Scurvy (effectiveness) | 1747: James Lind conducted one of the first-ever controlled clinical trials, proving that oranges and lemons cured scurvy in sailors. | 1795: The British Royal Navy finally made a daily ration of lemon juice a standard issue for all its sailors, effectively eliminating the disease. | 48 years |
| Handwashing (lower mortality) | 1847: Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis provided conclusive proof that having doctors wash their hands with a chlorine solution before delivering babies reduced maternal mortality rates from over 18% to around 1%. | ~1870s: Semmelweis's findings were rejected and he was ridiculed. His work was only validated decades later (after his death). | ~20+ years |
| Helicobacter pylori (bacteria causes ulcers) | 1982-1984: Marshall and Warren discovered that Helicobacter pylori bacteria causes ulcers, confirmed via direct exposure. Officials maintained that ulcers were caused by stress and spicy food. | 1994: The US NIH released a consensus statement officially recommending antibiotics as the standard treatment for peptic ulcers, overturning decades of acid-suppression therapy. | ~12 years |
| Asbestos (causes asbestosis & cancer) | 1924: The British Medical Journal published the first case study of a death from "asbestosis." By 1918, U.S. insurance companies had stopped selling life insurance to asbestos workers. | 1971 (US): The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was formed and began regulating asbestos as a carcinogen, setting the first federal workplace safety standards for it. | ~47 years |
| Leaded Gasoline (neurotoxicity) | ~1924: Dangers of low-level lead exposure were known. Experts like Alice Hamilton warned the U.S. Surgeon General that adding lead to gasoline would cause widespread public poisoning. | 1973 (US): The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ordered the first phasedown of lead in gasoline, following the Clean Air Act of 1970. A full ban for on-road vehicles took effect in 1996. | ~49 years |
| Harms of Smoking (causes lung cancer) | 1939: Franz Müller (Germany) published the first case-control epidemiological study strongly linking tobacco smoking to lung cancer. This was followed by major U.S. & U.K. studies in the 1950s. | 1964 (US): The U.S. Surgeon General's report, "Smoking and Health," was released. It was the first U.S. government report to definitively link smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. | 25 years |
| Treatment delay | Result |
| Post-exposure prophylaxis | 86% fewer cases265 |
| <24 hours | -33 hours symptoms266 |
| 24-48 hours | -13 hours symptoms266 |
| Inpatients | -2.5 hours to improvement267 |
0.1% mortality with early treatment vs. 6.2% with late treatment (49× lower)
Early-treatment physicians treated patients on presentation, while late-treatment physicians followed official guidance with treatment only on hospitalization. Groups are not randomized. Results are subject to selection and ascertainment bias and accurate analysis requires details of the patient populations and followup, however the results are consistent across many teams, and consistent with the extensive controlled clinical evidence showing a significant reduction in risk with many early treatments, and complementary/synergistic benefits with combined treatment.
| Gradient across outcomes | Vitamin D may not have a direct antiviral effect; rather, any benefits are hypothesized to stem from improving immune system function. We may expect a gradient of efficacy across outcomes, with minimal impact on preventing initial infection (PCR+ cases), but increasing efficacy as the disease progresses to more severe stages. Meta-regression confirms this with p = 0.031. |
| Calcitriol etc. vs. cholecalciferol | We expect calcitriol, calcifediol and analogs to be more effective than cholecalciferol due to the added conversion delay with cholecalciferol. Studies specifying calcitriol etc. vs. cholecalciferol show 1.5 times greater efficacy, interaction p = 0.033. |
| Continuous dosing vs. bolus dosing | Pharmacokinetics and the potential side effects of high bolus doses suggest that ongoing treatment spread over time is more appropriate. Studies specifying continuous dosing vs. bolus dosing show 2.8 times greater efficacy, interaction p = 0.000035. |
| Acute vs. chronic treatment | We expect acute treatment to avoid issues with chronic prophylaxis (CYP24A1 upregulation, FGF23 elevation, and a shifted immune baseline providing less dynamic range during acute infection). Acute treatment vs. chronic prophylaxis shows 2.1 times greater efficacy, interaction p = 0.0042. |

| Abbas, 4/15/2026, retrospective, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, mean age 44.7, 11 authors, study period February 2023 - August 2024. | risk of long COVID, 26.0% lower, RR 0.74, p = 0.11, all groups combined. |
| risk of long COVID, 31.0% lower, OR 0.69, p = 0.003, cutoff 20 ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), neuropsychiatric, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of long COVID, 56.5% lower, OR 0.43, p = 0.001, cutoff 20 ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), musculoskeletal, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of long COVID, 2.0% lower, OR 0.98, p = 0.04, cutoff 20 ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), other, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Abdollahi, 12/12/2020, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of case, 53.9% lower, RR 0.46, p = 0.001, high D levels 108, low D levels 294, >30ng/ml. |
| Abdrabbo AlYafei, 12/5/2022, retrospective, Qatar, peer-reviewed, mean age 19.0, 5 authors. | risk of case, 23.2% lower, OR 0.77, p < 0.001, cutoff 10ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), case control OR, severe deficiency vs. optimal, multivariable. |
| risk of case, 21.5% lower, OR 0.78, p < 0.001, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), case control OR, mild/moderate deficiency vs. optimal, multivariable. | |
| Abdulrahman, 4/17/2023, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, mean age 69.0, 7 authors, study period April 2020 - May 2021. | risk of death, 90.1% lower, OR 0.10, p = 0.048, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 76, low D levels (<25nmol/L) 5, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of progression, 82.5% lower, OR 0.18, p = 0.09, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 76, low D levels (<25nmol/L) 5, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), hospitalization, ICU, or death, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Abrishami, 10/30/2020, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, mean age 55.2, 7 authors. | risk of death, 75.9% lower, RR 0.24, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥25ng/mL) 3 of 47 (6.4%), low D levels (<25ng/mL) 9 of 26 (34.6%), NNT 3.5, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥25ng/mL), Cox model 2. |
| Afaghi, 10/12/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of death, 55.0% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.002, high D levels 97 of 537 (18.1%), low D levels 51 of 109 (46.8%), NNT 3.5, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL, multivariate. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 55.9% lower, RR 0.44, p < 0.001, high D levels 89 of 537 (16.6%), low D levels 41 of 109 (37.6%), NNT 4.8, >20ng/mL, unadjusted. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 34.1% lower, RR 0.66, p < 0.001, high D levels 211 of 537 (39.3%), low D levels 65 of 109 (59.6%), NNT 4.9, >20ng/mL, unadjusted. | |
| Al-Jarallah, 6/20/2021, retrospective, Kuwait, peer-reviewed, 20 authors. | risk of death, 88.3% higher, RR 1.88, p = 0.45, high D levels 8 of 120 (6.7%), low D levels 9 of 119 (7.6%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Al-Salman, 7/29/2021, retrospective, Bahrain, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 44.4% lower, OR 0.56, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 113, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 337, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), multinomial regression, RR approximated with OR. |
| Alguwaihes, 12/5/2020, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 10 authors. | risk of death, 85.7% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.007, high D levels 111, low D levels 328, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >12.5 nmol/L. |
| AlKhafaji, 1/31/2022, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, mean age 56.8, 16 authors, study period January 2021 - August 2021. | risk of death, 38.6% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.50, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 76 (2.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 13 of 127 (10.2%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 31.0% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.51, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 76 (2.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 13 of 127 (10.2%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 41.8% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.20, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 76 (2.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 13 of 127 (10.2%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Allami, 11/8/2022, retrospective, Iraq, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 92.5% lower, OR 0.07, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 91, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 80, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), case control OR, multivariable. |
| Almacioglu, 5/13/2026, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of case, 52.9% lower, RR 0.47, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 14 of 39 (35.9%), low D levels (<12 ng/mL) 32 of 42 (76.2%), NNT 2.5. |
| Alpcan, 8/10/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of case, 73.0% lower, OR 0.27, p < 0.001, high D levels 42 of 75 (56.0%) cases, 66 of 80 (82.5%) controls, NNT 3.2, case control OR, >20ng/mL. |
| AlSafar, 5/19/2021, retrospective, United Arab Emirates, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 59.3% lower, RR 0.41, p = 0.048, high D levels 16 of 337 (4.7%), low D levels 10 of 127 (7.9%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥12ng/mL. |
| risk of severe case, 33.2% lower, RR 0.67, p = 0.005, high D levels 337, low D levels 127, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥12ng/mL. | |
| Alzahrani (B), 6/23/2022, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, mean age 54.3, 9 authors, study period March 2020 - July 2021. | risk of death, 42.5% lower, OR 0.57, p = 0.46, high D levels (≥25ng/mL) 179, low D levels (<25ng/mL) 78, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of ICU admission, 7.4% lower, OR 0.93, p = 0.80, high D levels (≥25ng/mL) 179, low D levels (<25ng/mL) 78, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Amin, 1/7/2021, retrospective, population-based cohort, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 2 authors. | COVID-19 severity, 32.3% higher, RR 1.32, p = 0.20, high D levels 140,898, low D levels 35,079, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥50nmol/L vs. <25nmol/L, MR Egger, baseline risk approximated with overall risk. |
| risk of case, 7.6% higher, RR 1.08, p = 0.14, high D levels 140,898, low D levels 35,079, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥50nmol/L vs. <25nmol/L, MR Egger, baseline risk approximated with overall risk. | |
| Angelidi, 1/9/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 88.0% lower, RR 0.12, p = 0.01, high D levels 6 of 65 (9.2%), low D levels 20 of 79 (25.3%), NNT 6.2, adjusted per study, >30ng/mL, supplementary table 2, multivariable logistic regression model 5. |
| Anjum, 7/31/2020, prospective, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period March 2020 - June 2020, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 62.5% lower, RR 0.38, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 8 of 80 (10.0%), low D levels (<25nmol/L) 16 of 60 (26.7%), NNT 6.0. |
| Ansari, 12/31/2020, prospective, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 31 August, 2020, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 86.0% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 2 of 68 (2.9%), low D levels (<25nmol/L) 12 of 57 (21.1%), NNT 5.5. |
| Arabadzhiyska, 2/28/2023, retrospective, Bulgaria, peer-reviewed, mean age 53.7, 2 authors, study period October 2021 - December 2021. | risk of severe case, 29.8% lower, RR 0.70, p = 0.16, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 16 of 44 (36.4%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 29 of 56 (51.8%), NNT 6.5. |
| Arabi, 1/22/2023, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of death, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.28, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 6 of 30 (20.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 13 of 39 (33.3%), NNT 7.5. |
| risk of ICU admission, 39.3% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.20, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 7 of 30 (23.3%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 15 of 39 (38.5%), NNT 6.6. | |
| risk of AKI, 42.2% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.13, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 8 of 30 (26.7%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 18 of 39 (46.2%), NNT 5.1. | |
| Arambepola, 3/28/2024, retrospective, India, preprint, 6 authors. | risk of case, 47.4% lower, OR 0.53, p = 0.27, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 17 of 104 (16.3%) cases, 30 of 104 (28.8%) controls, NNT 5.6, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), case control OR. |
| Asgari, 11/21/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period 21 May, 2020 - 4 September, 2020. | risk of death, 72.5% lower, OR 0.27, p = 0.03, cutoff 25ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of progression, 65.6% lower, OR 0.34, p = 0.02, cutoff 25ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥25ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. | |
| Asghar, 11/10/2021, retrospective, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 53.1% lower, HR 0.47, p = 0.046, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 73, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 18, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), multivariate Cox regression. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 19.4% lower, HR 0.81, p = 0.32, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 5 of 73 (6.8%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 6 of 18 (33.3%), NNT 3.8, adjusted per study, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), multivariate Cox regression. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 32.9% lower, HR 0.67, p = 0.54, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 73, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 18, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), multivariate Cox regression. | |
| Atanasovska, 11/2/2021, retrospective, North Macedonia, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 40.7% lower, RR 0.59, p = 0.68, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 2 of 9 (22.2%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 9 of 24 (37.5%), NNT 6.5. |
| risk of severe case, 59.0% lower, RR 0.41, p = 0.13, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 2 of 9 (22.2%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 13 of 24 (54.2%), NNT 3.1. | |
| Athanassiou, 9/15/2023, prospective, Greece, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 47.9% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.39, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 5 of 64 (7.8%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 3 of 20 (15.0%), NNT 14. |
| risk of death, 43.0% lower, RR 0.57, p = 0.70, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 31 (6.5%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 6 of 53 (11.3%), NNT 21. | |
| Baktash, 8/27/2020, prospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 28.6% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.50, high D levels 4 of 31 (12.9%), low D levels 6 of 39 (15.4%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >30nmol/L. |
| Barassi, 1/25/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 64.9% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.44, high D levels 1 of 31 (3.2%), low D levels 8 of 87 (9.2%), NNT 17, >20ng/mL. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 64.9% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.15, high D levels 2 of 31 (6.5%), low D levels 16 of 87 (18.4%), NNT 8.4, >20ng/mL. | |
| Barrett, 8/9/2022, prospective, Ireland, peer-reviewed, mean age 56.0, 19 authors, study period March 2020 - April 2021. | risk of death, 78.4% lower, OR 0.22, p = 0.006, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 144, low D levels (<30nmol/L) 88, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of ICU admission, 15.3% lower, OR 0.85, p = 0.63, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 144, low D levels (<30nmol/L) 88, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of progression, 52.6% lower, OR 0.47, p = 0.12, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 144, low D levels (<30nmol/L) 88, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/L), extended oxygen requirement, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Basaran, 2/12/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of severe case, 68.6% lower, RR 0.31, p = 0.005, high D levels 82 of 119 (68.9%), low D levels 80 of 85 (94.1%), NNT 4.0, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >10μg/L, per standard deviation increase in levels. |
| Basińska-Lewandowska, 3/24/2023, retrospective, Poland, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of case, 58.3% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 20 of 109 (18.3%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 11 of 25 (44.0%), NNT 3.9. |
| Batur, 12/26/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, study period March 2020 - June 2021, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 71.9% lower, RR 0.28, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 17 of 76 (22.4%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 94 of 118 (79.7%), NNT 1.7. |
| secondary infection, 23.3% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 40 of 76 (52.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 81 of 118 (68.6%), NNT 6.2, growth in culture. | |
| Baykal, 5/30/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, study period 1 April, 2020 - 1 March, 2021, dosage 300,000IU single dose. | risk of death, 8.0% higher, RR 1.08, p = 0.80, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 11 of 20 (55.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 28 of 55 (50.9%), outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of ICU admission, 4.8% lower, RR 0.95, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 9 of 20 (45.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 26 of 55 (47.3%), NNT 44, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of progression, 6.1% lower, RR 0.94, p = 0.77, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 14 of 20 (70.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 41 of 55 (74.5%), NNT 22, severe/critical, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Bayrak, 4/5/2023, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 19.0, 8 authors, study period November 2020 - January 2021. | risk of moderate/severe case, 26.5% lower, RR 0.73, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 3 of 49 (6.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 2 of 24 (8.3%), NNT 45. |
| risk of case, 33.4% lower, OR 0.67, p = 0.23, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 41 of 73 (56.2%) cases, 50 of 76 (65.8%) controls, NNT 9.9, case control OR. | |
| Bayramoğlu, 3/31/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of moderate/severe case, 69.5% lower, RR 0.30, p = 0.03, high D levels 10 of 60 (16.7%), low D levels 24 of 43 (55.8%), NNT 2.6, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >12 ng/mL, multivariate logistic regression. |
| Begum (B), 9/29/2025, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of long COVID, 59.2% lower, OR 0.41, p = 0.01, high D levels 176, low D levels 248, RR approximated with OR. |
| Bennouar, 1/12/2021, prospective, Algeria, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 85.5% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.002, high D levels 4 of 30 (13.3%), low D levels 15 of 32 (46.9%), NNT 3.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >30μg/l vs. <10μg/l, proportional Cox regression. |
| risk of death, 63.0% lower, RR 0.37, p = 0.10, high D levels 4 of 30 (13.3%), low D levels 14 of 35 (40.0%), NNT 3.7, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >30μg/l vs. 10-19μg/l, proportional Cox regression. | |
| risk of death, 23.1% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.73, high D levels 4 of 30 (13.3%), low D levels 4 of 23 (17.4%), NNT 25, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >30μg/l vs. 20-29μg/l, proportional Cox regression. | |
| Bianconi, 7/1/2021, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 12 authors. | risk of death, 17.5% lower, HR 0.82, p = 0.58, high D levels (≥12ng/ml) 94, low D levels (<12ng/ml) 106, model 3, Table S2, Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of death, 13.9% lower, HR 0.86, p = 0.73, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 40, low D levels (<20ng/ml) 160, model 3, Table S2, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of death/ICU, 15.9% lower, HR 0.84, p = 0.53, high D levels (≥12ng/ml) 94, low D levels (<12ng/ml) 106, model 3, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of death/ICU, 10.9% lower, HR 0.89, p = 0.73, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 40, low D levels (<20ng/ml) 160, model 3, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| Bischofová, 7/20/2026, prospective, Czech Republic, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, study period February 2021 - May 2021, COMED trial. | risk of death, 47.0% lower, OR 0.53, p = 0.18, high D levels 120, low D levels 40, adjusted per study, Q2-Q4 (>36.7 nmol/L) vs Q1, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of severe case, 16.0% lower, OR 0.84, p = 0.70, high D levels 120, low D levels 40, adjusted per study, Q2-Q4 (>36.7 nmol/L) vs Q1, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 57.0% lower, OR 0.43, p = 0.32, high D levels 120, low D levels 40, adjusted per study, Q2-Q4 (>36.7 nmol/L) vs Q1, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Bogliolo, 7/5/2022, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, median age 73.0, 16 authors, study period March 2020 - August 2020. | risk of death, 15.3% lower, HR 0.85, p = 0.29, cutoff 20ng/mL, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL). |
| Bogomaz, 8/24/2023, retrospective, Ukraine, peer-reviewed, median age 62.0, 2 authors. | risk of death, 70.0% lower, RR 0.30, p = 0.24, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 1 of 28 (3.6%), low D levels (<30ng/ml) 5 of 42 (11.9%), NNT 12, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/ml), odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 75.0% lower, RR 0.25, p = 0.23, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 1 of 28 (3.6%), low D levels (<30ng/ml) 6 of 42 (14.3%), NNT 9.3. | |
| risk of progression, 62.5% lower, RR 0.38, p = 0.30, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 2 of 28 (7.1%), low D levels (<30ng/ml) 8 of 42 (19.0%), NNT 8.4, critical case. | |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 27.0% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.24, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 10 of 28 (35.7%), low D levels (<30ng/ml) 28 of 42 (66.7%), NNT 3.2, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/ml), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. | |
| Božić, 6/20/2024, prospective, Serbia, peer-reviewed, median age 69.0, 4 authors, study period October 2021 - December 2021. | risk of death, 53.3% lower, OR 0.47, p = 0.007, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of ICU admission, 30.5% lower, OR 0.70, p = 0.21, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Breslin, 8/17/2021, retrospective, Ireland, peer-reviewed, 4 authors. | risk of progression, 55.6% lower, OR 0.44, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥30nmol/l) 106, low D levels (<30nmol/l) 32, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/l), infiltrates on chest X-ray, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Bucurica, 3/6/2023, retrospective, Romania, peer-reviewed, mean age 55.2, 9 authors, study period 1 June, 2020 - 31 May, 2022. | risk of case, 27.6% lower, OR 0.72, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 7,958, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 3,224, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of case, 7.4% higher, OR 1.07, p = 0.19, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 4,367, low D levels (<30ng/mL) 6,815, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. | |
| Bushnaq, 2/8/2022, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of mechanical ventilation, 32.1% lower, RR 0.68, p = 0.27, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 10 of 53 (18.9%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 40 of 144 (27.8%), NNT 11, unadjusted. |
| risk of ICU admission, 3.9% lower, RR 0.96, p = 0.87, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 23 of 53 (43.4%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 65 of 144 (45.1%), NNT 57, unadjusted. | |
| Bychinin (B), 5/7/2021, retrospective, Russia, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: excessive unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 36.2% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 16 of 38 (42.1%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 31 of 47 (66.0%), NNT 4.2. |
| Campi, 6/14/2021, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death for severe patients, 24.3% lower, RR 0.76, p = 0.53, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 6 of 39 (15.4%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 13 of 64 (20.3%), NNT 20, hospitalized patients, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of ICU for severe patients, 53.1% lower, RR 0.47, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 12 of 39 (30.8%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 42 of 64 (65.6%), NNT 2.9, hospitalized patients, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Cannata-Andía, 2/18/2022, prospective, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, median age 59.0, 22 authors, study period 4 April, 2020 - 22 April, 2021, dosage 100,000IU single dose, trial NCT04552951 (history) (COVID-VIT-D), excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 117.0% higher, RR 2.17, p = 0.20, high D levels 87, low D levels 96, >25 vs. ≤10 ng/mL, adjusted by demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of ICU admission, 65.0% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.04, high D levels 87, low D levels 96, >25 vs. ≤10 ng/mL, adjusted by demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of progression, 79.0% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.003, high D levels 87, low D levels 96, pulmonary involvment at admission, >25 vs. ≤10 ng/mL, adjusted by demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Cardoso, 6/11/2024, prospective, Brazil, preprint, 7 authors, study period April 2020 - February 2022. | severe pneumonia, 66.7% lower, OR 0.33, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 83 of 145 (57.2%) cases, 147 of 175 (84.0%) controls, NNT 3.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/ml), case control OR, deficient vs. sufficient, multivariable. |
| severe pneumonia, 50.0% lower, OR 0.50, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 83 of 245 (33.9%) cases, 147 of 279 (52.7%) controls, NNT 5.3, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), case control OR, insufficient vs. sufficient, multivariable. | |
| Carpagnano, 8/9/2020, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 10 authors. | risk of death at day 26, 70.6% lower, RR 0.29, p = 0.0499, high D levels 5 of 34 (14.7%), low D levels 4 of 8 (50.0%), NNT 2.8, >30 ng/mL. |
| risk of death at day 10, 90.0% lower, RR 0.10, p = 0.02, high D levels 2 of 34 (5.9%), low D levels 4 of 8 (50.0%), NNT 2.3, adjusted per study, >30 ng/mL. | |
| Cereda (B), 11/1/2020, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 13 authors. | risk of death, 120.0% higher, RR 2.20, p = 0.04, high D levels 10 of 30 (33.3%), low D levels 24 of 99 (24.2%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL. |
| risk of ICU admission, 86.7% lower, RR 0.13, p = 0.59, high D levels 0 of 30 (0.0%), low D levels 5 of 99 (5.1%), NNT 20, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). | |
| Cetin Ozbek, 3/24/2023, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 63.4, 6 authors, study period 1 August, 2021 - 31 October, 2021. | risk of death, 50.9% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.07, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 7 of 61 (11.5%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 25 of 107 (23.4%), NNT 8.4. |
| risk of death, 3.0% lower, OR 0.97, p = 0.32, adjusted per study, continuous values, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Chadda, 11/25/2024, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, study period 12 May, 2020 - 22 May, 2020. | recovery time, 7.1% lower, relative time 0.93, p = 0.49, high D levels (≥30 nmol/l) median 13.0 IQR 14.0 n=331, low D levels (<30 nmol/l) median 14.0 IQR 14.5 n=61, all symptoms. |
| risk of no recovery, 67.4% lower, OR 0.33, p = 0.002, high D levels (≥30 nmol/l) 331, low D levels (<30 nmol/l) 61, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 nmol/l), multivariable, body ache, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 52.1% lower, OR 0.48, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥30 nmol/l) 331, low D levels (<30 nmol/l) 61, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 nmol/l), multivariable, fatigue, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of progression, 27.2% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.01, high D levels (≥30 nmol/l) 158 of 331 (47.7%), low D levels (<30 nmol/l) 40 of 61 (65.6%), NNT 5.6, >4 symptoms. | |
| Chan, 10/20/2024, retrospective, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, study period January 2022 - September 2024. | risk of death, 5.7% lower, HR 0.94, p = 0.42, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 365 of 34,407 (1.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 382 of 34,407 (1.1%), NNT 2024, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of progression, 4.8% lower, HR 0.95, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 4,181 of 34,407 (12.2%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 4,345 of 34,407 (12.6%), NNT 210, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), death, hospitalization, critical care, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of progression, 21.9% lower, HR 0.78, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 702 of 34,407 (2.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 885 of 34,407 (2.6%), NNT 188, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), critical care, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 1.0% lower, HR 0.99, p = 0.80, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 3,812 of 34,407 (11.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 3,803 of 34,407 (11.1%), inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), Cox proportional hazards. | |
| Chang, 7/4/2020, retrospective, USA, preprint, 13 authors, study period 9 March, 2020 - 14 June, 2020. | risk of case, 43.2% lower, OR 0.57, p < 0.001, cutoff 20ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), Table S4, RR approximated with OR. |
| Charkowick, 5/5/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period 1 January, 2020 - 5 February, 2021. | risk of death, 73.4% lower, OR 0.27, p = 0.02, high D levels 140, low D levels 68, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of ICU admission, 67.2% lower, OR 0.33, p = 0.001, high D levels 140, low D levels 68, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Charla, 7/13/2022, retrospective, India, preprint, 8 authors, study period 1 April, 2020 - 30 April, 2021, excluded in exclusion analyses: excessive unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 10.7% lower, RR 0.89, p = 0.74, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 24 of 91 (26.4%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 26 of 88 (29.5%), NNT 32. |
| Charoenngam, 3/8/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of death, 34.1% lower, RR 0.66, p = 0.26, high D levels 12 of 100 (12.0%), low D levels 29 of 187 (15.5%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥30ng/mL. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 37.2% lower, RR 0.63, p = 0.17, high D levels 14 of 100 (14.0%), low D levels 34 of 187 (18.2%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥30ng/mL. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 23.1% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.28, high D levels 25 of 100 (25.0%), low D levels 56 of 187 (29.9%), NNT 20, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥30ng/mL. | |
| risk of death, 58.1% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.05, high D levels 7 of 57 (12.3%), low D levels 25 of 79 (31.6%), NNT 5.2, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >65 years old, ≥30ng/mL. | |
| Chen (E), 6/18/2025, retrospective, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, mean age 51.3, 6 authors, study period June 2022 - December 2023. | risk of death, 61.3% lower, RR 0.39, p = 0.007, high D levels 45,276, low D levels 45,276, both periods combined. |
| risk of death, 72.8% lower, OR 0.27, p < 0.001, high D levels 22,638, low D levels 22,638, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, pre-Omicron, propensity score matching, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of death, 45.1% lower, OR 0.55, p < 0.001, high D levels 22,638, low D levels 22,638, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, post-Omicron, propensity score matching, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Chen (F), 2/28/2023, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period 1 June, 2022 - 5 July, 2022. | viral clearance, 40.0% improved, HR 0.60, p = 0.01, high D levels (≥41.07ng/mL) 52, low D levels (<27.5ng/mL) 53, adjusted per study, tertile 3 vs. tertile 1, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. |
| Choi, 1/2/2024, retrospective, South Korea, peer-reviewed, mean age 55.7, 6 authors, study period April 2022 - December 2022. | risk of no recovery, 48.9% lower, HR 0.51, p = 0.002, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 99, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 67, adjusted per study, multivariable. |
| risk of long COVID, 68.4% lower, HR 0.32, p = 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 99, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 67, adjusted per study, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 25.6% lower, RR 0.74, p = 0.48, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 11 of 99 (11.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 10 of 67 (14.9%), NNT 26, unadjusted. | |
| Connolly, 8/17/2021, retrospective, Ireland, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period March 2020 - May 2020. | risk of death, 90.4% lower, OR 0.10, p = 0.06, high D levels (≥30nmol/l) 65, low D levels (<30nmol/l) 49, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/l), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 73.3% lower, OR 0.27, p = 0.048, high D levels (≥30nmol/l) 65, low D levels (<30nmol/l) 49, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30nmol/l), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Cozier, 7/27/2021, prospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of case, 38.6% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.04, high D levels 94 of 1,601 (5.9%), low D levels 33 of 373 (8.8%), NNT 34, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL, multivariable. |
| Dana, 8/11/2022, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period March 2020 - November 2020. | risk of death, 33.1% lower, RR 0.67, p = 0.29, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 49 of 376 (13.0%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 8 of 46 (17.4%), NNT 23, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, sufficiency vs. severe deficiency, multivariable. |
| risk of death, 15.7% lower, RR 0.84, p = 0.44, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 49 of 376 (13.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 30 of 197 (15.2%), NNT 46, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, sufficiency vs. deficiency, multivariable. | |
| risk of severe case, no change, RR 1.00, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 59 of 376 (15.7%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 7 of 46 (15.2%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, sufficiency vs. severe deficiency, multivariable. | |
| risk of severe case, 11.6% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.45, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 59 of 376 (15.7%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 35 of 197 (17.8%), NNT 48, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, sufficiency vs. deficiency, multivariable. | |
| Davoudi, 5/18/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period February 2020 - March 2020, excluded in exclusion analyses: excessive unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 12.3% higher, RR 1.12, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 2 of 57 (3.5%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 3 of 96 (3.1%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 15.8% lower, RR 0.84, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 1 of 57 (1.8%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 2 of 96 (2.1%), NNT 304. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 27.8% lower, RR 0.72, p = 0.74, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 3 of 57 (5.3%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 7 of 96 (7.3%), NNT 49. | |
| risk of severe case, 68.4% higher, RR 1.68, p = 0.30, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 9 of 57 (15.8%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 9 of 96 (9.4%). | |
| Davran, 3/15/2023, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 53.6, 9 authors. | risk of death, 75.4% lower, RR 0.25, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥10ng/ml) 4 of 63 (6.3%), low D levels (<10ng/ml) 8 of 31 (25.8%), NNT 5.1. |
| De Smet, 11/25/2020, retrospective, Belgium, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 70.1% lower, RR 0.30, p = 0.02, high D levels 7 of 77 (9.1%), low D levels 20 of 109 (18.3%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL. |
| Demir, 1/29/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of severe case, 89.3% lower, RR 0.11, p < 0.001, high D levels 13, low D levels 99, ratio of the mean number of affected lung segments, >30ng/ml vs. ≤10ng/mL. |
| hospitalization time, 87.1% lower, relative time 0.13, p < 0.001, high D levels 13, low D levels 99, >30ng/ml vs. ≤10ng/mL. | |
| risk of case, 24.2% lower, RR 0.76, p = 0.18, high D levels 13 of 31 (41.9%), low D levels 99 of 179 (55.3%), NNT 7.5, >30ng/ml vs. ≤10ng/mL. | |
| Derakhshanian, 9/19/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 11 authors. | risk of death, 44.8% lower, RR 0.55, p = 0.046, high D levels 148, low D levels 142, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 41.7% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.09, high D levels 148, low D levels 142, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 37.3% lower, RR 0.63, p = 0.04, high D levels 148, low D levels 142, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| Devi, 4/15/2023, retrospective, India, peer-reviewed, mean age 47.0, 4 authors, study period August 2020 - August 2022. | risk of case, 98.0% lower, OR 0.02, p = 0.007, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 69 of 88 (78.4%) cases, 88 of 88 (100.0%) controls, NNT 1.8, case control OR. |
| risk of case, 88.4% lower, OR 0.12, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 54 of 88 (61.4%) cases, 82 of 88 (93.2%) controls, NNT 2.2, case control OR. | |
| Değirmenci, 7/30/2024, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 29.3, 7 authors, study period March 2020 - January 2021. | risk of ICU admission, 50.6% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.27, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 3 of 36 (8.3%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 15 of 89 (16.9%), NNT 12. |
| severe CT finding, 36.0% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.53, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 3 of 16 (18.8%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 17 of 58 (29.3%), NNT 9.5. | |
| moderate/severe CT finding, 25.6% lower, RR 0.74, p = 0.25, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 8 of 16 (50.0%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 39 of 58 (67.2%), NNT 5.8. | |
| hospitalization time, 16.7% lower, relative time 0.83, p = 0.48, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 36, low D levels (<20ng/ml) 89. | |
| di Filippo (D), 8/12/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 10.7% lower, RR 0.89, p = 1.00, high D levels 5 of 28 (17.9%), low D levels 12 of 60 (20.0%), NNT 47, >20ng/mL. |
| risk of ICU admission, 41.6% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.22, high D levels 6 of 28 (21.4%), low D levels 22 of 60 (36.7%), NNT 6.6, >20ng/mL. | |
| risk of severe case, 39.6% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.04, high D levels 11 of 28 (39.3%), low D levels 39 of 60 (65.0%), NNT 3.9, >20ng/mL. | |
| Diaz-Curiel, 6/6/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 73.2% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.02, high D levels 3 of 214 (1.4%), low D levels 91 of 1,017 (8.9%), odds ratio converted to relative risk, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL. |
| Dip, 6/25/2024, retrospective, Bangladesh, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period January 2021 - December 2021. | risk of severe case, 88.4% lower, OR 0.12, p = 0.003, high D levels (≥20 ng/ml) 46, low D levels (<20 ng/ml) 57, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/ml), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Domènech-Montoliu, 3/5/2025, prospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 38.8, 17 authors, study period January 2020 - August 2023. | risk of case, 37.9% lower, HR 0.62, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥30 ng/ml) 169, low D levels (<30 ng/ml) 208, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/ml). |
| Doğan (B), 8/4/2022, prospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period 1 July, 2021 - 30 October, 2021. | risk of case, 63.7% lower, OR 0.36, p = 0.003, high D levels (≥10ng/ml) 53 of 88 (60.2%) cases, 71 of 88 (80.7%) controls, NNT 4.1, case control OR. |
| Eden, 8/5/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 63.9% lower, RR 0.36, p = 0.10, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 3 of 26 (11.5%), low D levels (<25nmol/L) 8 of 25 (32.0%), NNT 4.9. |
| risk of death, 92.9% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.18, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 0 of 8 (0.0%), low D levels (<50nmol/L) 11 of 43 (25.6%), NNT 3.9, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). | |
| Efe Iris, 12/30/2023, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 46.9, 8 authors. | risk of case, 59.2% lower, OR 0.41, p < 0.001, cutoff 18.4ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥18.4ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Faniyi, 10/6/2020, prospective, United Kingdom, preprint, 10 authors. | risk of seropositive, 28.8% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.003, high D levels 170 of 331 (51.4%), low D levels 44 of 61 (72.1%), NNT 4.8, >30nmol/L. |
| Fatemi, 11/30/2021, prospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period 1 October, 2020 - 31 May, 2021. | risk of death, 42.0% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.07, high D levels 18 of 139 (12.9%), low D levels 25 of 109 (22.9%), NNT 10, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, vitamin D measured prior to COVID-19, multivariate. |
| risk of death, 51.1% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.02, high D levels 13 of 115 (11.3%), low D levels 30 of 133 (22.6%), NNT 8.9, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, vitamin D measured on admission, multivariate. | |
| risk of severe case, 37.9% lower, RR 0.62, p = 0.007, high D levels 38 of 139 (27.3%), low D levels 48 of 109 (44.0%), NNT 6.0, vitamin D measured prior to COVID-19. | |
| risk of severe case, 34.8% lower, RR 0.65, p = 0.02, high D levels 31 of 115 (27.0%), low D levels 55 of 133 (41.4%), NNT 6.9, vitamin D measured on admission. | |
| Faul, 6/30/2020, retrospective, Ireland, peer-reviewed, 9 authors. | risk of mechanical ventilation, 69.0% lower, RR 0.31, p = 0.03, high D levels 4 of 21 (19.0%), low D levels 8 of 12 (66.7%), NNT 2.1, adjusted per study, >30nmol/L. |
| Ferrer-Sánchez, 3/26/2022, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 81.8% lower, RR 0.18, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 0 of 9 (0.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 4 of 73 (5.5%), NNT 18, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. |
| risk of moderate/severe case, 88.7% lower, RR 0.11, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 0 of 9 (0.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 7 of 73 (9.6%), NNT 10, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | |
| risk of case, 62.7% lower, OR 0.37, p = 0.01, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Freitas (B), 3/27/2021, retrospective, Portugal, preprint, 36 authors. | risk of death, 41.2% lower, RR 0.59, p = 0.02, high D levels 23 of 179 (12.8%), low D levels 68 of 311 (21.9%), NNT 11, >20ng/mL. |
| Frish, 6/15/2023, retrospective, Israel, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period 1 February, 2020 - 31 December, 2020. | risk of case, 35.5% lower, OR 0.65, p = 0.001, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Galaznik, 5/28/2021, retrospective, USA, preprint, 6 authors. | risk of case, 35.1% lower, OR 0.65, p = 0.01, high D levels 13,903, low D levels 2,384, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, breast cancer patients, logistic regression, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of case, 32.4% lower, OR 0.68, p = 0.045, high D levels 13,601, low D levels 1,318, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, prostate cancer patients, logistic regression, RR approximated with OR. | |
| García-Zendejas, 9/16/2024, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, mean age 53.4, 3 authors. | risk of death, 65.2% lower, OR 0.35, p = 0.18, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of ICU admission, 64.2% lower, OR 0.36, p = 0.15, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 83.7% lower, OR 0.16, p = 0.02, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of case, 57.6% lower, OR 0.42, p = 0.26, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Gaudio, 3/27/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of case, 79.3% lower, OR 0.21, p < 0.001, high D levels 27 of 50 (54.0%) cases, 85 of 100 (85.0%) controls, NNT 2.7, case control OR. |
| Gavioli, 2/19/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors. | risk of death, 4.7% higher, RR 1.05, p = 0.83, high D levels 80 of 260 (30.8%), low D levels 52 of 177 (29.4%), >20ng/ml. |
| risk of death, 44.8% lower, RR 0.55, p < 0.001, high D levels 102 of 376 (27.1%), low D levels 30 of 61 (49.2%), NNT 4.5, >10ng/ml. | |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 55.2% lower, RR 0.45, p < 0.001, high D levels 127 of 260 (48.8%), low D levels 116 of 177 (65.5%), NNT 6.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >20ng/ml, multivariate. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 3.6% lower, RR 0.96, p = 0.41, high D levels 218 of 260 (83.8%), low D levels 154 of 177 (87.0%), NNT 32, >20ng/ml. | |
| Ghanei, 3/23/2022, prospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period 20 March, 2020 - 20 January, 2021. | risk of case, 42.1% lower, OR 0.58, p = 0.09, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 58 of 90 (64.4%) cases, 72 of 95 (75.8%) controls, NNT 7.4, case control OR. |
| Gholi, 7/19/2022, prospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 4 authors. | risk of death, 74.7% lower, HR 0.25, p < 0.001, high D levels 157, low D levels 38, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, model 2, day 45. |
| risk of death, 39.8% lower, HR 0.60, p = 0.05, high D levels 157, low D levels 38, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, ICU mortality, model 2. | |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 44.9% higher, HR 1.45, p = 0.27, high D levels 157, low D levels 38, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, model 2, day 45. | |
| Golabi, 8/26/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 10 authors. | odds of symptoms, 90.0% lower, OR 0.10, p < 0.001, high D levels 34, low D levels 10, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, GEE regression, RR approximated with OR. |
| odds of symptoms, 81.0% lower, OR 0.19, p = 0.006, high D levels 34, low D levels 9, 20-30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, GEE regression, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of case, 71.7% lower, OR 0.28, p = 0.07, high D levels 34 of 44 (77.3%) cases, 36 of 39 (92.3%) controls, NNT 3.5, case control OR, >30ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL. | |
| Gonzalez, 3/13/2023, retrospective, Argentina, peer-reviewed, 10 authors. | risk of death, 66.1% lower, OR 0.34, p = 0.046, high D levels (≥12ng/ml) 129, low D levels (<12ng/ml) 35, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥12ng/ml), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| González-Estevez, 7/7/2021, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of symptomatic case, 25.0% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 6 of 8 (75.0%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 32 of 32 (100.0%), NNT 4.0. |
| Green, 11/7/2022, retrospective, Israel, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period 1 February, 2020 - 31 December, 2020. | risk of case, 18.7% lower, OR 0.81, p < 0.001, cutoff 30ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Guðnadóttir, 3/4/2024, retrospective, Iceland, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period February 2020 - March 2021. | risk of death, 54.3% lower, OR 0.46, p = 0.15, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 221, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 52, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 8.3% lower, OR 0.92, p = 0.86, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 221, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 52, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 28.1% lower, OR 0.72, p = 0.43, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 221, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 52, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Gönen, 11/12/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 20 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 65.8% lower, RR 0.34, p = 0.62, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 1 of 80 (1.2%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 3 of 82 (3.7%), NNT 42, retrospective study. |
| risk of ICU admission, 16.9% lower, RR 0.83, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 4 of 77 (5.2%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 5 of 80 (6.2%), NNT 95, retrospective study. | |
| hospital stay >8 days, 21.1% lower, RR 0.79, p = 0.11, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 40 of 78 (51.3%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 52 of 80 (65.0%), NNT 7.3, retrospective study. | |
| Hafez, 3/29/2022, retrospective, United Arab Emirates, peer-reviewed, mean age 43.0, 11 authors. | risk of death, 97.7% lower, RR 0.02, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 6 of 116 (5.2%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 3 of 10 (30.0%), NNT 4.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥12ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable, model 2. |
| risk of death, 96.3% lower, RR 0.04, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 4 of 64 (6.2%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 5 of 62 (8.1%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable, model 3. | |
| Hammam, 8/16/2024, retrospective, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period December 2021 - April 2022. | risk of severe case, 51.6% lower, RR 0.48, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥25ng/mL) 11 of 49 (22.4%), low D levels (<25ng/mL) 19 of 41 (46.3%), NNT 4.2, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. |
| risk of case, 95.5% lower, OR 0.04, p < 0.001, cutoff 14.8ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥14.8ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Hastie, 8/26/2020, retrospective, population-based cohort, database analysis, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 14 authors. | risk of death, 17.4% lower, RR 0.83, p = 0.31, cutoff 25nmol/L, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), multivariable Cox. |
| risk of hospitalization, 9.1% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.40, cutoff 25nmol/L, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), multivariable Cox. | |
| Hemdan, 3/1/2022, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 1 author, study period March 2020 - February 2021. | risk of death, 30.7% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.02, high D levels 36 of 92 (39.1%), low D levels 57 of 101 (56.4%), NNT 5.8. |
| Hermawan, 3/28/2023, retrospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, survey, 5 authors, study period March 2022 - July 2022. | risk of symptomatic case, 70.6% lower, RR 0.29, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/ml) 10 of 34 (29.4%), low D levels (<10ng/ml) 13 of 13 (100.0%), NNT 1.4. |
| risk of symptomatic case, 45.6% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.42, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 2 of 7 (28.6%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 21 of 40 (52.5%), NNT 4.2. | |
| Hernández, 10/27/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 60.9, 12 authors. | risk of combined death/ICU/ventilation, 83.0% lower, RR 0.17, p < 0.001, high D levels 35, low D levels 162, ≥20ng/mL risk of hospitalization * risk of death/ICU/ventilation | hospitalization. |
| risk of combined death/ICU/ventilation if hospitalized, 12.0% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.86, high D levels 35, low D levels 162, ≥20ng/mL risk of death/ICU/ventilation | hospitalization. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 80.6% lower, RR 0.19, p < 0.001, ≥20ng/mL. | |
| Hogarth, 5/3/2023, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, median age 56.0, 9 authors, study period 1 January, 2021 - 8 November, 2021. | risk of case, 46.5% lower, OR 0.53, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 96,894, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 13,486, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), breakthrough case, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Hossain, 4/1/2025, retrospective, India, peer-reviewed, mean age 51.7, 5 authors, study period January 2021 - January 2022. | risk of severe case, 58.4% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.002, high D levels (≥20 ng/ml) 8 of 33 (24.2%), low D levels (<20 ng/ml) 39 of 67 (58.2%), NNT 2.9. |
| Huang, 3/24/2023, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period 14 June, 2021 - 1 April, 2022. | recovery time, 25.0% lower, relative time 0.75, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 28, low D levels (<20ng/ml) 18, relative time until resolution of pneumonia. |
| Hurst, 10/22/2021, prospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 23 authors. | risk of death, 68.4% lower, RR 0.32, p = 0.005, high D levels 68, low D levels 191, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >50nmol/l, multivariable, Supplementary Table 2, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 66.0% lower, RR 0.34, p = 0.004, high D levels 6 of 68 (8.8%), low D levels 61 of 191 (31.9%), NNT 4.3, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >50nmol/l, multivariable, Supplementary Table 2. | |
| Im, 8/11/2020, retrospective, South Korea, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of case, 73.1% lower, OR 0.27, p < 0.001, high D levels 13 of 50 (26.0%) cases, 85 of 150 (56.7%) controls, NNT 4.3, case control OR. |
| Infante, 2/18/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors. | risk of death, 54.8% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.046, high D levels 4 of 19 (21.1%), low D levels 55 of 118 (46.6%), NNT 3.9, >20ng/mL. |
| Israel, 9/20/2021, retrospective, population-based cohort, Israel, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 31 October, 2020. | risk of severe case, 33.9% lower, OR 0.66, p < 0.001, high D levels 423 of 1,036 (40.8%) cases, 509 of 934 (54.5%) controls, NNT 7.3, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, case control OR, >75 nmol/L vs. <30 nmol/L, multivariable. |
| risk of case, 19.7% lower, OR 0.80, p < 0.001, high D levels 6,152 of 15,892 (38.7%) cases, 73,810 of 159,193 (46.4%) controls, NNT 39, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, case control OR, >75 nmol/L vs. <30 nmol/L, among COVID+ cases, multivariable. | |
| Ito, 5/6/2025, retrospective, Japan, peer-reviewed, 12 authors. | risk of case, 5.3% higher, HR 1.05, p = 0.89, cutoff <12 ng/mL and ≥20 ng/mL, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL). |
| Jain (B), 11/19/2020, prospective, India, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of death, 85.2% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.001, high D levels 2 of 64 (3.1%), low D levels 19 of 90 (21.1%), NNT 5.6, >20ng/mL. |
| risk of ICU admission, 95.4% lower, RR 0.05, p < 0.001, high D levels 2 of 64 (3.1%), low D levels 61 of 90 (67.8%), NNT 1.5, >20ng/mL. | |
| Jalavu, 6/1/2023, prospective, South Africa, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period 29 October, 2020 - 10 February, 2021. | risk of death, 1.0% lower, HR 0.99, p = 0.97, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 16 of 31 (51.6%), low D levels (<50nmol/L) 38 of 55 (69.1%), NNT 5.7, Kaplan-Meier. |
| Jazar, 12/25/2025, retrospective, Qatar, peer-reviewed, mean age 46.6, 7 authors. | risk of death, 20.6% lower, RR 0.79, p = 0.78, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 4 of 93 (4.3%), low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 11 of 203 (5.4%), NNT 89. |
| ICU time, 42.6% lower, relative time 0.57, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) mean 11.3 (±11.0) n=93, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) mean 19.7 (±22.6) n=203. | |
| hospitalization time, 20.0% lower, relative time 0.80, p = 0.23, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) mean 14.8 (±8.8) n=93, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) mean 18.5 (±16.8) n=203. | |
| Jimenez, 7/26/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, study period 12 March, 2020 - 21 May, 2020, dosage paricalcitol 0.9μg weekly, excluded in exclusion analyses: many patients received vitamin D treatment. | risk of death, 7.7% higher, OR 1.08, p = 0.81, high D levels 50, low D levels 110, >30 vs. <20ng/ml, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 47.5% lower, OR 0.53, p = 0.56, high D levels 50, low D levels 110, >30 vs. <20ng/ml, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 12.2% lower, OR 0.88, p = 0.87, high D levels 50, low D levels 110, >30 vs. <20ng/ml, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 0.8% lower, OR 0.99, p = 0.98, high D levels 50, low D levels 110, >30 vs. <20ng/ml, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Jude, 6/17/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 71.6% lower, RR 0.28, p < 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >25 nmol/L, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. |
| risk of hospitalization, 57.9% lower, RR 0.42, p < 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >50 nmol/L, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| Junior, 2/17/2022, prospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of mechanical ventilation, 84.4% lower, OR 0.16, p = 0.03, cutoff 40ng/dl, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥40ng/dl), risk of mechanical ventilation for vitamin D levels >40ng/ml, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. |
| Kalichuran, 4/26/2022, prospective, South Africa, peer-reviewed, survey, 4 authors, study period September 2020 - February 2021. | risk of symptomatic case, 60.0% lower, RR 0.40, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 56, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 44, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL). |
| risk of symptomatic case, 58.2% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.004, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, higher sunlight exposure vs. lower sunlight exposure. | |
| Karahan, 10/5/2020, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors. | risk of death, 82.5% lower, RR 0.17, p < 0.001, high D levels 5 of 46 (10.9%), low D levels 64 of 103 (62.1%), NNT 2.0, >20nmol/L. |
| Karonova (C), 3/2/2022, retrospective, Russia, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period 30 November, 2020 - 20 March, 2021. | risk of severe case, 22.5% lower, OR 0.78, p = 0.01, cutoff 11.4ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥11.4ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Karonova (D), 8/29/2021, retrospective, Russia, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period April 2020 - December 2020. | risk of death, 77.8% lower, RR 0.22, p = 0.006, high D levels 8 of 96 (8.3%), low D levels 10 of 37 (27.0%), NNT 5.3, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >10ng/mL, logistic regression model 2. |
| risk of death, 84.8% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.06, high D levels 1 of 43 (2.3%), low D levels 17 of 90 (18.9%), NNT 6.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL, logistic regression model 2. | |
| risk of severe case, 67.3% lower, RR 0.33, p = 0.005, high D levels 12 of 96 (12.5%), low D levels 13 of 37 (35.1%), NNT 4.4, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >10ng/mL, logistic regression model 2. | |
| risk of severe case, 53.2% lower, RR 0.47, p = 0.13, high D levels 4 of 43 (9.3%), low D levels 21 of 90 (23.3%), NNT 7.1, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL, logistic regression model 2. | |
| Karonova (E), 12/31/2020, retrospective, Russia, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of death, 79.4% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.11, high D levels 1 of 23 (4.3%), low D levels 12 of 57 (21.1%), NNT 6.0, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/ml. |
| risk of severe case, 71.1% lower, RR 0.29, p = 0.05, high D levels 3 of 23 (13.0%), low D levels 22 of 57 (38.6%), NNT 3.9, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/ml. | |
| Katz, 12/4/2020, retrospective, population-based cohort, USA, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of case, 78.4% lower, RR 0.22, p < 0.001, high D levels 85 of 101,175 (0.1%), low D levels 87 of 31,950 (0.3%), NNT 531, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels. |
| Kaufman, 9/17/2020, retrospective, population-based cohort, USA, peer-reviewed, median age 54.0, 5 authors. | risk of case, 53.0% lower, RR 0.47, p < 0.001, high D levels 12,321, low D levels 39,190, >55 ng/mL vs. <20 ng/mL. |
| Kaur, 11/30/2021, prospective, India, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 89.8% lower, RR 0.10, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 5 of 64 (7.8%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 13 of 17 (76.5%), NNT 1.5. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 90.3% lower, RR 0.10, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 4 of 64 (6.2%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 11 of 17 (64.7%), NNT 1.7. | |
| Kazemi, 5/7/2022, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, mean age 56.0, 4 authors. | risk of death, 75.8% lower, RR 0.24, p = 0.26, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 1 of 75 (1.3%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 7 of 127 (5.5%), NNT 24. |
| risk of severe case, 4.8% higher, RR 1.05, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 13 of 75 (17.3%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 21 of 127 (16.5%). | |
| Khalil, 11/8/2022, retrospective, Iraq, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of case, 41.6% lower, OR 0.58, p = 0.27, high D levels (≥10ng/ml) 30 of 52 (57.7%) cases, 21 of 30 (70.0%) controls, NNT 8.2, case control OR. |
| Lau, 4/28/2020, retrospective, USA, preprint, 7 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 45.0% lower, RR 0.55, p = 0.29, high D levels 2 of 5 (40.0%), low D levels 11 of 15 (73.3%), NNT 3.0, >30ng/mL. |
| Li, 6/24/2025, prospective, China, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period 1 April, 2023 - 20 September, 2023. | risk of case, 5.9% lower, OR 0.94, p = 0.31, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 23, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 39, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), case control OR, multivariable. |
| Li (B), 5/19/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors. | risk of case, 8.6% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.24, high D levels 610 of 13,650 (4.5%), low D levels 290 of 4,498 (6.4%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL, Figure 2. |
| risk of case, 12.4% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.07, high D levels 289 of 7,272 (4.0%), low D levels 611 of 10,876 (5.6%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >30ng/mL, Figure 2. | |
| Li (C), 1/11/2021, retrospective, population-based cohort, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 36.2% lower, RR 0.64, p < 0.001, NNT 932, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >25nmol/L. |
| risk of case, 29.5% lower, RR 0.71, p < 0.001, NNT 823, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >25nmol/L. | |
| Livingston, 4/2/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of case, 50.9% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.02, high D levels 16 of 52 (30.8%), low D levels 31 of 52 (59.6%), NNT 3.5, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >34.4nmol/L. |
| Lohia, 3/4/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors. | risk of death, 14.7% lower, RR 0.85, p = 0.56, high D levels 88, low D levels 95, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence, >30 ng/mL vs. <20 ng/mL, >30 ng/mL group size approximated. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 18.9% lower, RR 0.81, p = 0.48, high D levels 88, low D levels 95, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence, >30 ng/mL vs. <20 ng/mL, >30 ng/mL group size approximated. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 28.5% lower, RR 0.72, p = 0.17, high D levels 88, low D levels 95, odds ratio converted to relative risk, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence, >30 ng/mL vs. <20 ng/mL, >30 ng/mL group size approximated. | |
| Luo, 11/13/2020, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, median age 56.0, 5 authors. | risk of progression, 63.0% lower, RR 0.37, p = 0.01, high D levels 335, low D levels 560, >30nmol/L. |
| Ma, 12/3/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period May 2020 - March 2021, dosage varies. | risk of hospitalization, 67.0% lower, OR 0.33, p = 0.15, high D levels 7,893, low D levels 7,823, adjusted per study, highest quintile vs. lowest quintile predicted vitamin D levels, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of symptomatic case, 9.0% lower, OR 0.91, p = 0.52, high D levels 7,893, low D levels 7,823, adjusted per study, highest quintile vs. lowest quintile predicted vitamin D levels, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of case, 52.0% lower, OR 0.48, p = 0.01, high D levels 7,893, low D levels 7,823, adjusted per study, highest quintile vs. lowest quintile predicted vitamin D levels, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Macaya, 10/21/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of severe case, 55.0% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.07, high D levels 11 of 35 (31.4%), low D levels 20 of 45 (44.4%), NNT 7.7, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL. |
| Madar, 6/27/2025, retrospective, Lebanon, peer-reviewed, mean age 38.8, 4 authors, study period 23 November, 2021 - 30 April, 2022. | risk of case, 33.8% lower, OR 0.66, p = 0.15, high D levels (≥50 ng/mL) 143, low D levels (<30 ng/mL) 114, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50 ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Manojlovic, 6/15/2023, retrospective, Serbia, peer-reviewed, mean age 57.6, 11 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 89.9% lower, RR 0.10, p = 0.009, high D levels (≥30nmol/l) 1 of 41 (2.4%), low D levels (<30nmol/l) 8 of 33 (24.2%), NNT 4.6. |
| Martínez-Rodríguez, 3/31/2022, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 52.2% lower, OR 0.48, p = 0.04, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Matangkha, 9/18/2025, retrospective, Thailand, peer-reviewed, mean age 45.9, 4 authors. | risk of long COVID, 82.8% lower, OR 0.17, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 48, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 52, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Matin, 7/30/2021, retrospective, case control, Iran, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of case, 66.1% lower, OR 0.34, p < 0.001, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, case control OR, >20ng/mL. |
| Mayurathan, 8/8/2023, retrospective, Sri Lanka, peer-reviewed, 11 authors. | risk of death, 98.2% higher, RR 1.98, p = 0.69, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 8 of 113 (7.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 1 of 28 (3.6%). |
| risk of severe case, 67.3% higher, RR 1.67, p = 0.32, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 27 of 113 (23.9%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 4 of 28 (14.3%). | |
| Mazziotti, 3/5/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 2.4% lower, RR 0.98, p = 0.91, high D levels 187, low D levels 161, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >12ng/mL, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, 37.0% lower, RR 0.63, p = 0.006, high D levels 72 of 187 (38.5%), low D levels 97 of 161 (60.2%), NNT 4.6, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >12ng/mL, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Meltzer (B), 3/19/2021, retrospective, database analysis, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of case, 34.6% lower, RR 0.65, p = 0.11, high D levels 61 of 1,097 (5.6%), low D levels 118 of 1,251 (9.4%), NNT 26, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >40ng/mL vs. <20ng/mL, Table 2, Model 2. |
| Meltzer (C), 9/3/2020, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of case, 43.5% lower, RR 0.56, p = 0.02, high D levels 39 of 317 (12.3%), low D levels 32 of 172 (18.6%), NNT 16, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >20ng/mL. |
| Mendy, 6/27/2020, retrospective, USA, preprint, 4 authors. | risk of death, 7.0% lower, RR 0.93, p = 0.89, high D levels 21 of 600 (3.5%), low D levels 5 of 89 (5.6%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of death/ICU, 16.7% lower, RR 0.83, p < 0.001, high D levels 68 of 600 (11.3%), low D levels 23 of 89 (25.8%), NNT 6.9, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 55.3% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.008, high D levels 47 of 600 (7.8%), low D levels 18 of 89 (20.2%), NNT 8.1, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 15.1% lower, RR 0.85, p < 0.001, high D levels 171 of 600 (28.5%), low D levels 45 of 89 (50.6%), NNT 4.5, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Merzon, 7/23/2020, retrospective, Israel, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 46.4% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.06, high D levels 79, low D levels 703, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >30ng/mL. |
| risk of case, 28.4% lower, RR 0.72, p < 0.001, high D levels 1,139, low D levels 6,668, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >30ng/mL. | |
| Mingiano, 7/30/2023, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period November 2020 - February 2021, dosage calcifediol 450μg days 1-2, patients with deficiency only. | risk of death, 49.8% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.005, cutoff 10ng/mL, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of death, 35.9% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.04, cutoff 20ng/mL, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Mirkarimi, 11/6/2024, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period May 2022 - May 2023. | risk of moderate/severe case, 62.9% lower, RR 0.37, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 117 of 345 (33.9%), low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 233 of 255 (91.4%), NNT 1.7, moderate/severe vs. mild. |
| Mohamed, 12/31/2024, retrospective, Egypt, peer-reviewed, mean age 5.5, 2 authors, study period 1 June, 2023 - 31 May, 2024. | risk of death, 44.7% lower, RR 0.55, p = 0.19, high D levels (≥10 ng/mL) 14 of 47 (29.8%), low D levels (<10 ng/mL) 7 of 13 (53.8%), NNT 4.2. |
| risk of death, 67.3% lower, RR 0.33, p = 0.003, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 6 of 33 (18.2%), low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 15 of 27 (55.6%), NNT 2.7. | |
| Monroy-Iglesias, 7/18/2025, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, mean age 56.0, 8 authors, study period March 2020 - October 2020. | risk of hospitalization, 26.5% lower, OR 0.74, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 69,746, low D levels (<25nmol/L) 19,358, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), deficiency, model B, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of hospitalization, 16.0% lower, OR 0.84, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 69,746, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 81,797, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), deficiency, model B, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of case, 5.3% higher, OR 1.05, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 69,746, low D levels (<25nmol/L) 19,358, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), deficiency, model B, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of case, 3.1% higher, OR 1.03, p = 0.05, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 69,746, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 81,797, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L), deficiency, model B, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Mostafa, 11/30/2022, retrospective, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period November 2020 - December 2021, excluded in exclusion analyses: categorical results are unadjusted with significant differences between groups. | risk of death, 92.8% lower, RR 0.07, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 4 of 135 (3.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 21 of 51 (41.2%), NNT 2.6, unadjusted, normal vs. deficiency. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 95.0% lower, RR 0.05, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 4 of 135 (3.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 30 of 51 (58.8%), NNT 1.8, unadjusted, normal vs. deficiency. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 90.6% lower, RR 0.09, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 9 of 135 (6.7%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 36 of 51 (70.6%), NNT 1.6, unadjusted, normal vs. deficiency. | |
| Nahhas, 10/1/2025, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, mean age 42.0, 5 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 51.2% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.29, high D levels (≥50 nmol/l) 4 of 129 (3.1%), low D levels (<30 nmol/l) 11 of 173 (6.4%), NNT 31. |
| Najih, 1/31/2025, retrospective, Morocco, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period January 2021 - January 2022. | risk of symptomatic case, 53.1% lower, RR 0.47, p = 0.002, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 20 of 67 (29.9%), low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 21 of 33 (63.6%), NNT 3.0, symptomatic vs. mildly symptomatic/asymptomatic. |
| Nasiri, 6/30/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of death, 8.9% higher, OR 1.09, p = 0.89, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 238, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 43, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Neves, 6/14/2022, retrospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, mean age 62.1, 7 authors, study period July 2020 - December 2020, excluded in exclusion analyses: excessive unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of death, 57.1% lower, RR 0.43, p = 0.046, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 12 of 87 (13.8%), low D levels (<50nmol/L) 9 of 28 (32.1%), NNT 5.4. |
| risk of ICU admission, 19.5% higher, RR 1.20, p = 0.81, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 26 of 87 (29.9%), low D levels (<50nmol/L) 7 of 28 (25.0%). | |
| Nguyen, 5/3/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period 15 July, 2020 - 15 October, 2020. | risk of death, 81.1% lower, OR 0.19, p = 0.008, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), 25-OH-D3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 52.8% lower, OR 0.47, p = 0.13, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), 25-OH-D3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 74.0% lower, HR 0.26, p < 0.001, cutoff 20ng/mL, 25-OH-D3, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| Nimavat, 8/5/2021, retrospective, India, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 50.4% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.17, high D levels 13 of 131 (9.9%), low D levels 5 of 25 (20.0%), NNT 9.9, >10ng/mL, within cases. |
| risk of severe case, 67.6% lower, RR 0.32, p = 0.003, high D levels 17 of 131 (13.0%), low D levels 10 of 25 (40.0%), NNT 3.7, >10ng/mL, within cases. | |
| Orchard, 1/19/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 58.8% lower, RR 0.41, p = 0.001, high D levels 9 of 40 (22.5%), low D levels 41 of 75 (54.7%), NNT 3.1, all hospitalized patients, >50 nmol/L. |
| risk of death, 24.1% lower, RR 0.76, p = 1.00, high D levels 1 of 9 (11.1%), low D levels 6 of 41 (14.6%), NNT 28, ICU patients only, >50 nmol/L. | |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 8.9% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.70, high D levels 6 of 9 (66.7%), low D levels 30 of 41 (73.2%), NNT 15, ICU patients only, >50 nmol/L. | |
| Ortatatli, 2/14/2023, prospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 82.1% lower, RR 0.18, p = 0.09, cutoff 20ng/mL, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), 25(OH)D. |
| risk of death, 73.7% lower, RR 0.26, p = 0.04, cutoff 1ng/mL, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥1ng/mL), 1,25(OH)2D. | |
| Ozturk, 5/16/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of severe case, 46.4% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.10, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 9 of 110 (8.2%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 29 of 190 (15.3%), NNT 14. |
| Panagiotou, 6/30/2020, retrospective, United Kingdom, preprint, 12 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 52.0% lower, RR 0.48, p = 0.02, high D levels 8 of 44 (18.2%), low D levels 34 of 90 (37.8%), NNT 5.1, >50nmol/L. |
| Pande, 3/16/2022, retrospective, India, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period October 2020 - October 2021, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of severe case, 93.4% lower, RR 0.07, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 7 of 116 (6.0%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 85 of 93 (91.4%), NNT 1.2. |
| Parra-Ortega, 8/24/2021, prospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 98.7% lower, RR 0.01, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/dL) 0 of 15 (0.0%), low D levels (<20ng/dL) 63 of 79 (79.7%), NNT 1.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), unadjusted. |
| Pashaei, 11/18/2024, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of severe case, 12.5% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.76, high D levels (≥31 ng/mL) 19 of 38 (50.0%), low D levels (<31 ng/mL) 8 of 14 (57.1%), NNT 14. |
| Pavlyshyn, 4/5/2024, retrospective, Ukraine, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of severe case, 59.7% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.13, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 7 of 59 (11.9%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 5 of 17 (29.4%), NNT 5.7, deficiency vs. other. |
| risk of case, 89.0% lower, OR 0.11, p = 0.13, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 59 of 76 (77.6%) cases, 15 of 15 (100.0%) controls, NNT 4.9, case control OR. | |
| Pecina, 8/27/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 35.9% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.74, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 6 of 77 (7.8%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 1 of 15 (6.7%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable logistic regression, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 56.9% lower, RR 0.43, p = 0.22, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 8 of 15 (53.3%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 4 of 15 (26.7%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable logistic regression, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 13.1% higher, RR 1.13, p = 0.57, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 54 of 77 (70.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 9 of 15 (60.0%), inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable logistic regression, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Pepkowitz, 9/29/2020, retrospective, USA, preprint, 7 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 55.8% lower, RR 0.44, p = 0.01, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 9 of 24 (37.5%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 11 of 13 (84.6%), NNT 2.1, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL). |
| Perestiuk, 2/14/2025, prospective, Ukraine, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period September 2022 - March 2024. | risk of long COVID, 54.3% lower, OR 0.46, p = 0.03, high D levels 108, low D levels 54, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, RR approximated with OR. |
| Pietzner, 7/8/2024, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 9 authors. | risk of death, 55.4% lower, HR 0.45, p < 0.001, cutoff 25nmol/L, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of hospitalization, 52.6% lower, HR 0.47, p < 0.001, cutoff 25nmol/L, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), Cox proportional hazards. | |
| severe respiratory failure, 24.8% lower, HR 0.75, p = 0.05, cutoff 25nmol/L, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of long COVID, 56.1% lower, HR 0.44, p < 0.001, cutoff 25nmol/L, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥25nmol/L), Cox proportional hazards. | |
| Pimental, 5/31/2021, retrospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of death, 29.4% lower, RR 0.71, p = 1.00, high D levels 3 of 17 (17.6%), low D levels 2 of 8 (25.0%), NNT 14, >20ng/mL. |
| Protas, 4/6/2023, retrospective, Kazakhstan, peer-reviewed, survey, 6 authors, study period October 2022 - November 2022. | risk of case, 76.6% lower, OR 0.23, p = 0.06, high D levels (≥10ng/ml) 68 of 88 (77.3%) cases, 29 of 31 (93.5%) controls, NNT 4.8, case control OR. |
| risk of case, 46.2% lower, OR 0.54, p = 0.17, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 50 of 88 (56.8%) cases, 22 of 31 (71.0%) controls, NNT 8.8, case control OR. | |
| Putra, 12/10/2021, retrospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, study period February 2020 - September 2020. | risk of hospitalization, 25.6% lower, OR 0.74, p = 0.59, high D levels 9 of 31 (29.0%) cases, 11 of 31 (35.5%) controls, NNT 14, case control OR. |
| Rachman, 9/13/2024, retrospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, mean age 42.8, 5 authors, study period October 2021 - January 2022. | risk of severe case, 51.5% lower, RR 0.48, p = 0.37, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 28 (7.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 19 of 129 (14.7%), NNT 13. |
| Rachman (B), 4/13/2023, prospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period October 2021 - February 2022. | risk of death, 94.8% lower, RR 0.05, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 0 of 45 (0.0%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 14 of 146 (9.6%), NNT 10, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of severe case, 77.6% lower, RR 0.22, p = 0.01, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 45 (4.4%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 29 of 146 (19.9%), NNT 6.5. | |
| Radujkovic, 9/10/2020, prospective, Germany, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of death, 93.2% lower, HR 0.07, p = 0.001, high D levels 144, low D levels 12, >30nmol/L. |
| risk of death/intubation, 84.0% lower, HR 0.16, p < 0.001, high D levels 144, low D levels 12, >30nmol/L. | |
| Ramirez-Sandoval, 10/15/2021, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of death, 31.5% lower, HR 0.68, p < 0.001, high D levels 2,337, low D levels 571, adjusted per study, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels, >12.5ng/mL, 30 day in-hospital mortality. |
| hospitalization time, 22.2% lower, relative time 0.78, p < 0.001, high D levels 2,337, low D levels 571. | |
| Ramos, 11/15/2021, retrospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 11 authors. | risk of case, 45.7% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.16, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 4 of 9 (44.4%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 9 of 11 (81.8%), NNT 2.7. |
| Ranjbar, 11/29/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 27 authors, study period 16 February, 2020 - 21 March, 2020. | risk of death, 41.9% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.07, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 16 of 163 (9.8%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 26 of 154 (16.9%), NNT 14. |
| Reis, 5/21/2021, prospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 19 authors. | risk of death, 23.0% lower, HR 0.77, p = 0.82, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 198, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 16, model 2, Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 45.0% higher, HR 1.45, p = 0.77, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 198, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 16, adjusted per study, model 2, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 33.3% lower, HR 0.67, p = 0.18, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 198, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 16, adjusted per study, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), model 2, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| hospitalization time, 22.2% lower, relative time 0.78, p = 0.06, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 191, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 15, model 2. | |
| Renieris, 11/26/2023, retrospective, Greece, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, trial NCT04357366 (history). | risk of death, 52.4% lower, HR 0.48, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 17 of 130 (13.1%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 17 of 60 (28.3%), NNT 6.6, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL). |
| Reyes Pérez, 4/30/2020, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 61.7% lower, RR 0.38, p = 0.006, high D levels (≥8ng/mL) 21 of 137 (15.3%), low D levels (<8ng/mL) 14 of 35 (40.0%), NNT 4.1, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥8ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Ribeiro, 8/5/2021, retrospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of case, 50.5% lower, OR 0.50, p = 0.01, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, >30ng/mL, multivariate, RR approximated with OR. |
| Ricci, 3/3/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 15 authors. | risk of death, 87.6% lower, RR 0.12, p = 0.07, high D levels 0 of 30 (0.0%), low D levels 3 of 22 (13.6%), NNT 7.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), >10 ng/mL. |
| Ritsinger, 4/28/2023, retrospective, Sweden, peer-reviewed, mean age 79.8, 8 authors, study period 1 January, 2020 - 9 September, 2021. | risk of death, 9.1% lower, HR 0.91, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 37,972, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 6,894, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥50nmol/L). |
| Rizzi, 4/16/2026, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, study period January 2021 - May 2021. | risk of no recovery, 59.2% lower, OR 0.41, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥11 ng/mL) 93, low D levels (<11 ng/mL) 46, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥11 ng/mL), risk of no discharge alive and/or NEWS2 ≤ 2 for at least 24 h within 14 days, multivariable, Table 6, RR approximated with OR. |
| Rodríguez-Vidales, 2/24/2022, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period March 2020 - September 2020. | risk of severe case, 38.9% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.05, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 89 of 265 (33.6%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 27 of 32 (84.4%), NNT 2.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| Rozemeijer, 1/29/2024, prospective, Netherlands, peer-reviewed, 9 authors. | risk of ICU admission, 35.7% lower, OR 0.64, p = 0.67, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 6 of 20 (30.0%) cases, 2 of 5 (40.0%) controls, NNT 14, case control OR. |
| Sanamandra, 4/30/2023, prospective, India, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period August 2020 - March 2021. | risk of death, 20.9% lower, OR 0.79, p = 0.67, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 155, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 45, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 15.3% lower, OR 0.85, p = 0.73, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 155, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 45, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of severe case, 434.8% higher, OR 5.35, p = 0.12, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 155, low D levels (<10ng/mL) 45, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥10ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. | |
| Sanson, 2/19/2022, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, study period March 2020 - September 2020, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | NIV/IMV/death, 64.0% lower, RR 0.36, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 2 of 9 (22.2%), low D levels (<30ng/mL) 37 of 60 (61.7%), NNT 2.5. |
| Saponaro, 1/24/2022, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, study period March 2020 - May 2020. | risk of ARDS, 36.5% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.43, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 5 of 32 (15.6%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 15 of 61 (24.6%), NNT 11, severe ARDS. |
| Savitri, 5/8/2021, retrospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of symptomatic case, 88.0% lower, RR 0.12, p < 0.001, high D levels 3 of 25 (12.0%), low D levels 17 of 17 (100.0%), NNT 1.1, >20ng/ml. |
| Schmidt, 3/22/2023, prospective, Poland, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period 4 February, 2021 - 31 December, 2021. | risk of death, 85.5% lower, OR 0.14, p = 0.003, cutoff 27ng/mL, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥27ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Seal, 1/1/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of death, 45.1% lower, RR 0.55, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 60ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. |
| risk of death, 40.5% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 50ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of death, 34.6% lower, RR 0.65, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 40ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of death, 25.9% lower, RR 0.74, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 30ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of death, 20.0% lower, RR 0.80, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 25ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of death, 11.5% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 20ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 22.5% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.01, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 60ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 20.0% lower, RR 0.80, p = 0.009, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 50ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 16.7% lower, RR 0.83, p = 0.007, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 40ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 12.3% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.008, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 30ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 9.1% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.01, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 25ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 4.8% lower, RR 0.95, p = 0.02, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, 20ng/mL vs. 15 ng/mL. | |
| Seven, 11/23/2021, prospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period September 2020 - November 2020. | risk of severe disease or poor prognostic factor, 46.5% lower, RR 0.53, p = 0.006, cutoff 14.5ng/ml, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥14.5ng/ml). |
| Sheng, 9/12/2025, retrospective, Taiwan, peer-reviewed, mean age 58.2, 6 authors. | risk of death, 90.6% lower, OR 0.09, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 22, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 45, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Sinaci, 8/11/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of moderate/severe case, 79.5% lower, RR 0.21, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 8 of 100 (8.0%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 23 of 59 (39.0%), NNT 3.2, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of case, 59.9% lower, RR 0.40, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥10ng/mL) 100 of 397 (25.2%), low D levels (<10ng/mL) 59 of 94 (62.8%), NNT 2.7, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Singhsakul, 6/9/2024, retrospective, Thailand, peer-reviewed, mean age 50.8, 6 authors, study period 1 September, 2021 - 30 November, 2021. | risk of severe case, 51.2% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 16 of 52 (30.8%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 28 of 45 (62.2%), NNT 3.2, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| moderate case, 67.3% lower, RR 0.33, p = 0.34, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 2 of 52 (3.8%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 2 of 45 (4.4%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. | |
| Siuka, 3/9/2023, prospective, Slovenia, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period December 2020 - December 2021. | risk of death, 55.9% lower, RR 0.44, p = 0.24, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 10 of 255 (3.9%), low D levels (<30nmol/L) 4 of 45 (8.9%), NNT 20. |
| risk of ICU admission, 58.8% higher, RR 1.59, p = 0.59, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 27 of 255 (10.6%), low D levels (<30nmol/L) 3 of 45 (6.7%). | |
| risk of severe case, 61.0% higher, RR 1.61, p = 0.009, high D levels (≥30nmol/L) 146 of 255 (57.3%), low D levels (<30nmol/L) 16 of 45 (35.6%). | |
| Smaha, 1/22/2022, retrospective, Slovakia, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, study period 1 November, 2020 - 30 April, 2021. | risk of death, 19.0% lower, RR 0.81, p = 0.05, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 127 of 283 (44.9%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 41 of 74 (55.4%), NNT 9.5. |
| Subramanian, 1/31/2022, prospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 49.7% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.02, high D levels 16 of 115 (13.9%), low D levels 33 of 118 (28.0%), NNT 7.1, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, 50-74 nmol/L vs. <25nmol/L, multivariable, outcome based on serum levels. |
| risk of death, 39.7% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.07, high D levels 16 of 115 (13.9%), low D levels 38 of 157 (24.2%), NNT 9.7, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, 50-74 nmol/L vs. 25-49nmol/L, multivariable, outcome based on serum levels. | |
| Sulli (B), 2/24/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 79.2% lower, OR 0.21, p < 0.001, high D levels 28 of 65 (43.1%) cases, 51 of 65 (78.5%) controls, NNT 2.7, case control OR, >10ng/mL. |
| Susianti, 2/12/2021, retrospective, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, 8 authors. | risk of death, 91.5% lower, RR 0.09, p = 0.32, high D levels 0 of 8 (0.0%), low D levels 9 of 42 (21.4%), NNT 4.7, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), >49.92 nmol/L. |
| risk of ICU admission, 90.5% lower, RR 0.10, p = 0.32, high D levels 0 of 8 (0.0%), low D levels 8 of 42 (19.0%), NNT 5.2, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), >49.92 nmol/L. | |
| risk of progression, 81.5% lower, OR 0.19, p = 0.04, high D levels 8, low D levels 42, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, ISTH DIC≥5, >49.92 nmol/L, bivariate, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of progression, 44.4% lower, OR 0.56, p = 0.03, high D levels 8, low D levels 42, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, increased D-dimer >2 mg/L, >49.92 nmol/L, multivariate, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Szeto, 12/30/2020, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of death, 5.6% higher, RR 1.06, p = 1.00, high D levels 14 of 58 (24.1%), low D levels 8 of 35 (22.9%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 39.7% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.21, high D levels 10 of 58 (17.2%), low D levels 10 of 35 (28.6%), NNT 8.8. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 26.7% higher, RR 1.27, p = 0.50, high D levels 21 of 58 (36.2%), low D levels 10 of 35 (28.6%). | |
| Sánchez-Zuno (B), 5/28/2021, prospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, dosage 10,000IU days 1-14. | risk of severe case, 5.6% lower, RR 0.94, p = 1.00, high D levels 4 of 8 (50.0%), low D levels 18 of 34 (52.9%), NNT 34, >30ng/mL, >4 symptoms. |
| Tallon, 11/15/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 17 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 41.5% lower, OR 0.58, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 113,143, low D levels (<30ng/mL) 3,227, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Tan (B), 2/27/2023, retrospective, Philippines, peer-reviewed, 3 authors. | risk of progression, 71.5% lower, RR 0.29, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 7 of 38 (18.4%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 18 of 34 (52.9%), NNT 2.9, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥30ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, combined mortality and morbidity, multivariable. |
| risk of death, 91.1% lower, RR 0.09, p = 0.002, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 1 of 38 (2.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 10 of 34 (29.4%), NNT 3.7, unadjusted. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 82.1% lower, RR 0.18, p = 0.010, high D levels (≥30ng/mL) 2 of 38 (5.3%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 10 of 34 (29.4%), NNT 4.1, unadjusted. | |
| Tanriverdi, 4/30/2025, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, mean age 64.0, 1 author, study period 1 June, 2020 - 31 December, 2022, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 59.6% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.07, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 4 of 52 (7.7%), low D levels (<30 ng/mL) 24 of 126 (19.0%), NNT 8.8. |
| Tehrani, 1/25/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 47.5% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.07, high D levels 34 of 180 (18.9%), low D levels 9 of 25 (36.0%), NNT 5.8, >10ng/ml. |
| Tomasa-Irriguible, 10/26/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period March 2020 - May 2020. | risk of mechanical ventilation, 35.0% lower, RR 0.65, p = 0.21, high D levels 15 of 27 (55.6%), low D levels 18 of 78 (23.1%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥20 ng/mL, bivariate logistic regression. |
| risk of ICU admission, 16.9% lower, RR 0.83, p = 0.58, high D levels 11 of 27 (40.7%), low D levels 17 of 78 (21.8%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥20 ng/mL, bivariate logistic regression. | |
| Topan, 2/28/2023, retrospective, Romania, peer-reviewed, survey, 6 authors, study period April 2020 - May 2022. | risk of death, 30.6% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 61 of 1,148 (5.3%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 118 of 1,194 (9.9%), adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| risk of severe case, 10.9% lower, RR 0.89, p = 0.02, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 432 of 1,148 (37.6%), low D levels (<20ng/mL) 560 of 1,194 (46.9%), NNT 11, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), odds ratio converted to relative risk, severe/critical case, multivariable. | |
| Umay, 7/26/2023, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 31 January, 2021. | hospitalization time, 13.5% lower, relative time 0.87, p = 0.33, high D levels 374, low D levels 39. |
| Vanegas-Cedillo, 3/14/2021, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 15 authors. | risk of death, 52.6% lower, RR 0.47, p = 0.006, high D levels (≥12ng/mL) 95 of 494 (19.2%), low D levels (<12ng/mL) 21 of 57 (36.8%), NNT 5.7, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels (≥12ng/mL). |
| Vasheghani (B), 1/18/2021, retrospective, Iran, preprint, 6 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of ICU admission, 63.8% lower, RR 0.36, p = 0.009, high D levels 13 of 185 (7.0%), low D levels 53 of 323 (16.4%), NNT 11, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, vitamin D levels >30ng/mL. |
| Vassiliou (B), 12/9/2020, prospective, Greece, peer-reviewed, 6 authors. | risk of death, 90.9% lower, RR 0.09, p = 0.04, high D levels 0 of 15 (0.0%), low D levels 5 of 15 (33.3%), NNT 3.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), >15.2ng/mL. |
| Voelkle, 4/30/2022, prospective, Switzerland, peer-reviewed, median age 67.0, 9 authors, study period 17 March, 2020 - 30 April, 2020. | risk of death/ICU, 23.4% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.55, high D levels 8 of 34 (23.5%), low D levels 7 of 23 (30.4%), NNT 14, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Vásquez-Procopio, 12/2/2022, retrospective, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 12 authors. | risk of severe case, 82.8% lower, OR 0.17, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 111, low D levels (<20ng/mL) 54, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Wagner, 5/31/2025, prospective, USA, peer-reviewed, mean age 64.3, 12 authors, study period July 2020 - December 2021, trial NCT04482673 (history). | risk of case, 74.1% lower, RR 0.26, p = 0.01, high D levels 22 of 106 (20.8%), low D levels 22 of 25 (88.0%), NNT 1.5, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Walk, 11/9/2020, retrospective, Netherlands, preprint, 5 authors. | risk of death/intubation, 0.4% higher, RR 1.00, p = 1.00, high D levels 48 of 110 (43.6%), low D levels 10 of 23 (43.5%), >25nmol/L. |
| Wang (C), 3/29/2023, prospective, China, peer-reviewed, median age 36.5, 23 authors, study period 18 December, 2022 - 20 February, 2023, dosage 200,000IU days 1, 14, trial NCT05673980 (history). | risk of case, 22.7% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.19, high D levels (≥30ng/ml) 20 of 44 (45.5%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 50 of 85 (58.8%), NNT 7.5, outcome based on serum levels. |
| Wani, 6/1/2023, retrospective, India, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of severe case, 72.2% lower, OR 0.28, p = 0.007, high D levels (≥28ng/mL) 66, low D levels (<28ng/mL) 170, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥28ng/mL), RR approximated with OR. |
| Wu (B), 12/19/2023, retrospective, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period 1 January, 2022 - 30 November, 2022. | risk of death, 42.8% lower, HR 0.57, p = 0.005, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 8,300, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 8,300, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), propensity score matching. |
| risk of hospitalization, 18.7% lower, HR 0.81, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 8,300, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 8,300, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), propensity score matching. | |
| ER visit, 10.2% lower, HR 0.90, p = 0.03, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 8,300, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 8,300, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), propensity score matching. | |
| risk of long COVID, 2.0% higher, HR 1.02, p = 0.93, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 8,300, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 8,300, inverted to make HR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), propensity score matching. | |
| Węgrzynek-Gallina, 1/31/2024, retrospective, Poland, peer-reviewed, mean age 66.5, 6 authors, study period November 2020 - June 2021. | hospitalization time, 33.3% lower, relative time 0.67, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥50nmol/L) 169, low D levels (<50nmol/L) 63. |
| Ye, 10/13/2020, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 18 authors. | risk of severe/critical COVID-19, 93.4% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.03, high D levels 2 of 36 (5.6%), low D levels 8 of 26 (30.8%), NNT 4.0, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, >50nmol/L. |
| You, 12/22/2024, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 81.9% lower, OR 0.18, p = 0.15, high D levels 96, low D levels 73, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of severe case, 95.6% lower, OR 0.04, p = 0.01, high D levels 96, low D levels 73, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Yılmaz, 10/5/2020, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors. | risk of severe case, 73.4% lower, RR 0.27, p = 1.00, high D levels 0 of 11 (0.0%), low D levels 2 of 29 (6.9%), NNT 14, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), >20ng/ml. |
| risk of moderate or severe case, 41.4% lower, RR 0.59, p = 0.69, high D levels 2 of 11 (18.2%), low D levels 9 of 29 (31.0%), NNT 7.8, >20ng/ml. | |
| Zafar, 9/6/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, median age 68.0, 37 authors. | risk of death, 42.9% higher, RR 1.43, p = 0.71, high D levels (≥25nmol/L) 12 of 42 (28.6%), low D levels (<25nmol/L) 2 of 10 (20.0%), COVID+ patients. |
| risk of death, 6.0% lower, OR 0.94, p = 0.68, high D levels 42, low D levels 10, COVID+ patients, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Zeidan, 9/9/2022, prospective, Egypt, peer-reviewed, median age 11.4, 38 authors. | risk of hospitalization, 61.5% lower, OR 0.38, p = 0.002, cutoff 20ng/mL, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20ng/mL), case control OR, multivariable. |
| Zelzer, 6/22/2021, retrospective, Austria, peer-reviewed, 7 authors. | risk of death, 46.4% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.08, high D levels 24 of 121 (19.8%), low D levels 10 of 27 (37.0%), NNT 5.8, >30nmol/L. |
| Zendehdel, 1/12/2026, retrospective, Iran, preprint, 7 authors, study period 21 March, 2020 - 11 September, 2020. | risk of death, 65.9% lower, OR 0.34, p = 0.04, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 91, low D levels (<12 ng/mL) 65, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 25.9% lower, OR 0.74, p = 0.67, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 91, low D levels (<12 ng/mL) 65, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 47.9% lower, OR 0.52, p = 0.16, high D levels (≥30 ng/mL) 91, low D levels (<12 ng/mL) 65, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥30 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of death, 41.2% lower, OR 0.59, p = 0.13, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 145, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 131, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 34.2% lower, OR 0.66, p = 0.36, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 145, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 131, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 13.0% lower, OR 0.87, p = 0.68, high D levels (≥20 ng/mL) 145, low D levels (<20 ng/mL) 131, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor high D levels (≥20 ng/mL), multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Zidrou, 2/19/2022, retrospective, Greece, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period August 2020 - October 2020. | risk of death, 26.4% lower, RR 0.74, p = 1.00, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 2 of 25 (8.0%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 5 of 46 (10.9%), NNT 35. |
| radiographic changes, 18.2% lower, RR 0.82, p = 0.26, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 16 of 25 (64.0%), low D levels (<20ng/ml) 36 of 46 (78.3%), NNT 7.0. | |
| hospitalization time, 37.7% lower, relative time 0.62, p = 0.16, high D levels (≥20ng/ml) 25, low D levels (<20ng/ml) 46. | |
| Álvarez, 10/28/2022, retrospective, Spain, preprint, 1 author, study period March 2020 - March 2021, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 38.8% lower, RR 0.61, p < 0.001, high D levels 4,871 of 33,673 (14.5%), low D levels 611 of 2,588 (23.6%), NNT 11, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of ICU admission, 54.7% lower, RR 0.45, p < 0.001, high D levels 289 of 33,673 (0.9%), low D levels 49 of 2,588 (1.9%), NNT 97, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 43.0% lower, RR 0.57, p < 0.001, high D levels 8,905 of 33,673 (26.4%), low D levels 1,202 of 2,588 (46.4%), NNT 5.0, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Ünsal, 4/5/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 10 authors. | risk of death, 80.6% lower, RR 0.19, p = 0.23, high D levels 0 of 29 (0.0%), low D levels 2 of 27 (7.4%), NNT 14, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), ≥20ng/mL. |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 73.4% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.07, high D levels 2 of 29 (6.9%), low D levels 7 of 27 (25.9%), NNT 5.3, ≥20ng/mL. | |
| Şengül, 12/31/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period March 2020 - December 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 75.6% lower, OR 0.24, p < 0.001, high D levels (≥20ng/mL) 7 of 54 (13.0%) cases, 100 of 264 (37.9%) controls, NNT 6.4, case control OR, outcome based on serum levels. |
| Annweiler, 5/31/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, France, peer-reviewed, 17 authors, study period 15 April, 2020 - 17 December, 2020, dosage 400,000IU single dose, trial NCT04344041 (history) (COVIT-TRIAL). | risk of death, 30.0% lower, HR 0.70, p = 0.29, treatment 19 of 126 (15.1%), control 21 of 126 (16.7%), Cox proportional hazards, day 28, intention-to-treat. |
| risk of death, 38.0% lower, HR 0.62, p = 0.17, treatment 17 of 121 (14.0%), control 21 of 121 (17.4%), Cox proportional hazards, day 28, per-protocol. | |
| risk of death, 61.0% lower, HR 0.39, p = 0.049, treatment 8 of 127 (6.3%), control 14 of 127 (11.0%), Cox proportional hazards, day 14, intention-to-treat. | |
| risk of death, 65.0% lower, HR 0.35, p = 0.03, treatment 7 of 122 (5.7%), control 14 of 122 (11.5%), Cox proportional hazards, day 14, per-protocol. | |
| Annweiler (B), 11/2/2020, retrospective, France, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, dosage 80,000IU single dose. | risk of death, 63.0% lower, RR 0.37, p = 0.28, treatment 3 of 16 (18.8%), control 10 of 32 (31.2%), NNT 8.0, adjusted per study, supplementation after diagnosis. |
| Annweiler (C), 10/13/2020, retrospective, France, peer-reviewed, mean age 87.7, 6 authors, dosage 80,000IU single dose, 80,000IU either in the week following the suspicion or diagnosis of COVID-19, or during the previous month. | risk of death, 89.0% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.002, treatment 10 of 57 (17.5%), control 5 of 9 (55.6%), NNT 2.6, adjusted per study. |
| Asimi, 5/22/2021, retrospective, Bosnia and Herzegovina, preprint, 3 authors, dosage 2,000IU daily, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with zinc and selenium) - results of individual treatments may vary, excluded in exclusion analyses: excessive unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of mechanical ventilation, 97.4% lower, RR 0.03, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 270 (0.0%), control 9 of 86 (10.5%), NNT 9.6, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), unadjusted. |
| risk of hospitalization, 99.0% lower, RR 0.010, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 270 (0.0%), control 24 of 86 (27.9%), NNT 3.6, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), unadjusted. | |
| risk of severe case, 99.5% lower, RR 0.005, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 270 (0.0%), control 51 of 86 (59.3%), NNT 1.7, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), unadjusted. | Boukef, 2/28/2023, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Tunisia, trial NCT05670444 (history). | 150 patient RCT with results unknown and over 3 years late. |
| Burahee, 2/17/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage 100,000IU days 1-4, additional 200000IU over four weeks if serum level insufficient. | risk of death, 93.3% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.01, treatment 0 of 12 (0.0%), control 2 of 2 (100.0%), NNT 1.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| Din Ujjan, 1/18/2023, Randomized Controlled Trial, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period 21 September, 2021 - 21 January, 2022, dosage 360IU days 1-14, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with curcumin and quercetin) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial NCT04603690 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: combined treatments may contribute significantly to the effect seen; unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of no recovery, 28.6% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.11, treatment 15 of 25 (60.0%), control 21 of 25 (84.0%), NNT 4.2, no symptoms, day 7. |
| risk of no recovery, 71.4% lower, RR 0.29, p < 0.001, treatment 6 of 25 (24.0%), control 21 of 25 (84.0%), NNT 1.7, ≤1 symptom, day 7. | |
| risk of no recovery, 76.9% lower, RR 0.23, p = 0.005, treatment 3 of 25 (12.0%), control 13 of 25 (52.0%), NNT 2.5, ≤2 symptoms, day 7. | |
| risk of no recovery, 85.7% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.23, treatment 0 of 25 (0.0%), control 3 of 25 (12.0%), NNT 8.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), ≤3 symptoms, day 7. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 90.9% lower, RR 0.09, p = 0.05, treatment 0 of 25 (0.0%), control 5 of 25 (20.0%), NNT 5.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 14. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 73.7% lower, RR 0.26, p < 0.001, treatment 5 of 25 (20.0%), control 19 of 25 (76.0%), NNT 1.8, day 7. | |
| Efird, 12/31/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 10 September, 2020, dosage varies. | risk of death, 48.9% lower, RR 0.51, p = 0.10, treatment 11 of 544 (2.0%), control 413 of 15,794 (2.6%), adjusted per study, non-hospitalized patients, vitamin D + no corticosteroids vs. no vitamin D + no corticosteroids. |
| risk of death, 54.5% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.02, treatment 11 of 192 (5.7%), control 553 of 4,340 (12.7%), NNT 14, adjusted per study, hospitalized patients, vitamin D + no corticosteroids vs. no vitamin D + no corticosteroids. | |
| Hunt, 6/29/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 10 September, 2020, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 47.0% lower, RR 0.53, p < 0.001, treatment 43 of 1,019 (4.2%), control 1,569 of 25,489 (6.2%), adjusted per study, day 30. |
| Khan, 5/1/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period 2 September, 2021 - 28 November, 2021, dosage 360IU days 1-14, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with curcumin and quercetin) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial NCT05130671 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: based on dosages and previous research, combined treatments may contribute more to the effect seen. | risk of no recovery, 33.3% lower, RR 0.67, p = 0.15, treatment 10 of 25 (40.0%), control 15 of 25 (60.0%), NNT 5.0. |
| relative CRP reduction, 39.1% better, RR 0.61, p = 0.006, treatment 25, control 25. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 50.0% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.009, treatment 10 of 25 (40.0%), control 20 of 25 (80.0%), NNT 2.5. | |
| Said, 11/8/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period 21 July, 2021 - 30 December, 2021, dosage 2,000IU daily, trial NCT04981743 (history). | risk of no recovery, 42.0% lower, OR 0.58, p = 0.57, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, dyspnea, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of no recovery, 89.0% lower, OR 0.11, p = 0.01, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, dyspnea, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 52.0% lower, OR 0.48, p = 0.16, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, cough, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 77.0% lower, OR 0.23, p = 0.01, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, cough, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 56.0% lower, OR 0.44, p = 0.20, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, fatigue, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 90.0% lower, OR 0.10, p < 0.001, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, fatigue, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 33.0% lower, OR 0.67, p = 0.67, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, smell, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 67.0% lower, OR 0.33, p = 0.23, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, smell, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 25.0% higher, OR 1.25, p = 0.79, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, taste, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 58.0% lower, OR 0.42, p = 0.28, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, taste, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 56.0% lower, OR 0.44, p = 0.36, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, sore throat, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 86.0% lower, OR 0.14, p = 0.03, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, sore throat, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 175.0% higher, OR 2.75, p = 0.13, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, headache, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 56.0% lower, OR 0.44, p = 0.21, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, headache, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 87.0% lower, OR 0.13, p = 0.05, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, multivariable, diarrhea, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no recovery, 90.0% lower, OR 0.10, p = 0.03, treatment 30, control 30, adjusted per study, vitamin D and nigella sativa, multivariable, diarrhea, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 49.0% lower, OR 0.51, p = 0.20, treatment 30, control 30, day 14, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 23.0% lower, OR 0.77, p = 0.74, treatment 30, control 30, day 7, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 91.0% lower, OR 0.09, p < 0.001, treatment 30, control 30, vitamin D and nigella sativa, day 14, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 87.0% lower, OR 0.13, p = 0.003, treatment 30, control 30, vitamin D and nigella sativa, day 7, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Sánchez-Zuno, 5/28/2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, dosage 10,000IU days 1-14. | risk of severe case, 89.4% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.04, treatment 0 of 22 (0.0%), control 4 of 20 (20.0%), NNT 5.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), risk of >3 symptoms at day 14. |
| risk of no recovery, 80.8% lower, RR 0.19, p = 0.22, treatment 0 of 22 (0.0%), control 2 of 20 (10.0%), NNT 10.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), risk of fever at day 14, Table S1. | |
| Valecha, 4/26/2022, prospective, India, peer-reviewed, 1 author, average treatment delay 3.7 days, dosage 1,000IU daily, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with magnesium and vitamin B12) - results of individual treatments may vary. | risk of ICU admission, 86.8% lower, RR 0.13, p = 0.09, treatment 0 of 30 (0.0%), control 3 of 25 (12.0%), NNT 8.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| hospitalization time, 38.5% lower, relative time 0.62, p < 0.001, treatment mean 11.2 (±2.8) n=30, control mean 18.2 (±1.21) n=25. |
| Abdelhai, 7/15/2024, Randomized Controlled Trial, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 5 authors. | risk of death, 82.9% lower, RR 0.17, p < 0.001, treatment 8 of 170 (4.7%), control 22 of 80 (27.5%), NNT 4.4. |
| hospitalization time, 44.9% lower, relative time 0.55, p < 0.001, treatment mean 8.81 (±2.98) n=170, control mean 16.0 (±5.42) n=80. | |
| risk of no viral clearance, 74.3% lower, RR 0.26, p < 0.001, treatment 35 of 170 (20.6%), control 64 of 80 (80.0%), NNT 1.7. | |
| Al Sulaiman, 8/14/2023, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 25 authors, study period March 2020 - July 2021, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 22.0% higher, HR 1.22, p = 0.25, treatment 72 of 144 (50.0%), control 62 of 144 (43.1%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 27.0% higher, OR 1.27, p = 0.046, treatment 144, control 144, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 17.0% higher, OR 1.17, p = 0.07, treatment 144, control 144, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of hospitalization, no change, OR 1.00, p = 1.00, treatment 144, control 144, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Alcala-Diaz, 5/21/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 17 authors, dosage calcifediol 0.5mg day 1, 0.27mg day 3, 0.27mg day 7, 0.27mg day 14, 0.27mg day 21, 0.27mg day 28. | risk of death, 80.8% lower, RR 0.19, p = 0.04, treatment 4 of 79 (5.1%), control 90 of 458 (19.7%), NNT 6.9, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, day 30, multivariate logistic regression. |
| Baguma (B), 12/28/2021, retrospective, Uganda, preprint, 16 authors, study period March 2020 - October 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 96.7% lower, RR 0.03, p = 0.02, treatment 23, control 458, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor treatment, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable, control prevalance approximated with overall prevalence. |
| Baykal, 5/30/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, study period 1 April, 2020 - 1 March, 2021, dosage 300,000IU single dose, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details; significant confounding by time possible due to separation of groups in different time periods. | risk of death, 22.2% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.43, treatment 7 of 18 (38.9%), control 28 of 56 (50.0%), NNT 9.0. |
| risk of ICU admission, 59.4% lower, RR 0.41, p = 0.005, treatment 5 of 18 (27.8%), control 39 of 57 (68.4%), NNT 2.5. | |
| Beigmohammadi, 11/14/2021, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Iran, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period April 2020 - July 2020, dosage 600,000IU single dose, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with vitamins A, B, C, E) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial IRCT20200319046819N1, excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 88.9% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.11, treatment 0 of 30 (0.0%), control 4 of 30 (13.3%), NNT 7.5, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of hospitalization >7 days, 41.0% lower, RR 0.59, p = 0.25, treatment 4 of 30 (13.3%), control 16 of 30 (53.3%), NNT 2.5, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| relative SOFA score @day 7, 45.5% better, RR 0.55, p < 0.001, treatment 30, control 30. | |
| Bishop, 2/5/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, USA, peer-reviewed, survey, 11 authors, study period 2 November, 2020 - 8 October, 2021, dosage calcifediol 300μg days 1-3, 60μg days 4-27, trial NCT04551911 (history) (REsCue). | ER/urgent care visits, 85.4% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.25, treatment 0 of 65 (0.0%), control 3 of 69 (4.3%), NNT 23, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of no recovery, 33.7% lower, RR 0.66, p = 0.56, treatment 5 of 65 (7.7%), control 8 of 69 (11.6%), NNT 26, day 21, mid-trial. | |
| risk of no recovery, 73.5% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.37, treatment 1 of 65 (1.5%), control 4 of 69 (5.8%), NNT 23, day 35. | |
| risk of no recovery, 57.5% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.44, treatment 2 of 65 (3.1%), control 5 of 69 (7.2%), NNT 24, day 28. | |
| risk of no recovery, 6.2% higher, RR 1.06, p = 0.85, treatment 17 of 65 (26.2%), control 17 of 69 (24.6%), day 14. | |
| risk of no recovery, 3.0% higher, RR 1.03, p = 1.00, treatment 33 of 65 (50.8%), control 34 of 69 (49.3%), day 7. | |
| resolution of 5 aggregated symptoms, 9.3% lower, relative time 0.91, p = 0.52, treatment mean 9.8 (±8.15) n=65, control mean 10.8 (±9.54) n=69. | |
| Blázquez-Cabrera, 6/10/2025, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 73.0, 6 authors, study period 24 January, 2021 - 8 March, 2021, dosage varies (calcitriol), trial NCT05819918 (history) (ALBACOVIDIOL). | risk of death, 52.4% lower, OR 0.48, p = 0.05, treatment 119, control 111, adjusted per study, all patients, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of death, 95.4% lower, OR 0.05, p = 0.004, treatment 16, control 18, severely deficient patients, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of death, 38.5% lower, RR 0.62, p = 0.19, treatment 8 of 65 (12.3%), control 33 of 165 (20.0%), NNT 13, previous vitamin D treatment. | |
| Bychinin, 11/3/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Russia, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period 1 May, 2020 - 31 January, 2022, average treatment delay 9.0 days, dosage 60,000IU day 1, 5,000IU days 2-7, 8, 5,000IU days 9-14, 15, 5,000IU days 16-21, 22, 5,000IU days 23-28, trial NCT05092698 (history) (COVID-VIT), excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 26.9% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.18, treatment 19 of 52 (36.5%), control 27 of 54 (50.0%), NNT 7.4. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 7.4% lower, RR 0.93, p = 0.68, treatment 33 of 52 (63.5%), control 37 of 54 (68.5%), NNT 20. | |
| Cannata-Andía, 2/18/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, median age 59.0, 22 authors, study period 4 April, 2020 - 22 April, 2021, dosage 100,000IU single dose, trial NCT04552951 (history) (COVID-VIT-D), excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 44.0% higher, RR 1.44, p = 0.31, treatment 22 of 274 (8.0%), control 15 of 269 (5.6%). |
| risk of ICU admission, 4.9% higher, RR 1.05, p = 0.82, treatment 47 of 274 (17.2%), control 44 of 269 (16.4%). | |
| Cervero, 7/4/2022, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Spain, peer-reviewed, median age 65.0, 10 authors, study period June 2020 - March 2021, average treatment delay 7.0 days, dosage 10,000IU days 1-14. | risk of death, 7.3% higher, RR 1.07, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 41 (2.4%), control 1 of 44 (2.3%). |
| risk of ICU admission, 78.5% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.20, treatment 1 of 41 (2.4%), control 5 of 44 (11.4%), NNT 11. | |
| risk of ARDS, 28.5% lower, RR 0.72, p = 0.74, treatment 4 of 41 (9.8%), control 6 of 44 (13.6%), NNT 26. | |
| De Niet, 7/26/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Belgium, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period August 2020 - August 2021, dosage 25,000IU days 1-4, 11, 18, 25, trial NCT04636086 (history). | risk of death, 65.1% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.61, treatment 1 of 21 (4.8%), control 3 of 22 (13.6%), NNT 11, COVID-19 mortality. |
| risk of death, 39.7% higher, RR 1.40, p = 0.70, treatment 4 of 21 (19.0%), control 3 of 22 (13.6%), all cause including after discharge and non-COVID-19. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 58.1% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.41, treatment 2 of 21 (9.5%), control 5 of 22 (22.7%), NNT 7.6. | |
| ICU time, 67.7% lower, relative time 0.32, p = 0.47, treatment 21, control 22. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 79.6% lower, RR 0.20, p = 0.49, treatment 0 of 21 (0.0%), control 2 of 22 (9.1%), NNT 11, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 36. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 85.4% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.23, treatment 0 of 21 (0.0%), control 3 of 22 (13.6%), NNT 7.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 28. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 85.4% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.23, treatment 0 of 21 (0.0%), control 3 of 22 (13.6%), NNT 7.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 21. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 65.1% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.61, treatment 1 of 21 (4.8%), control 3 of 22 (13.6%), NNT 11, day 14. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 65.1% lower, RR 0.35, p = 0.03, treatment 4 of 21 (19.0%), control 12 of 22 (54.5%), NNT 2.8, day 7. | |
| recovery time, 45.4% lower, relative time 0.55, p = 0.06, treatment 21, control 22, fever. | |
| hospitalization time, 50.0% lower, relative time 0.50, p = 0.003, treatment 21, control 22. | |
| Dinoi, 2/20/2025, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period 17 March, 2020 - 15 June, 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 48.4% lower, OR 0.52, p < 0.001, treatment 69 of 247 (27.9%) cases, 106 of 247 (42.9%) controls, NNT 6.1, case control OR. |
| Domazet Bugarin, 2/28/2023, Randomized Controlled Trial, Croatia, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period November 2021 - May 2022, dosage 10,000IU days 1-14, trial NCT05384574 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 21.0% lower, RR 0.79, p = 0.20, treatment 30 of 75 (40.0%), control 39 of 77 (50.6%), NNT 9.4, day 60. |
| risk of death, 12.5% lower, RR 0.87, p = 0.61, treatment 23 of 75 (30.7%), control 27 of 77 (35.1%), NNT 23, day 28. | |
| risk of death, 28.9% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.49, treatment 9 of 75 (12.0%), control 13 of 77 (16.9%), NNT 20, day 14. | |
| Elamir, 9/8/2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, USA, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period September 2020 - December 2020, dosage calcitriol 0.5μg days 1-14. | risk of death, 85.7% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.23, treatment 0 of 25 (0.0%), control 3 of 25 (12.0%), NNT 8.3, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 80.0% lower, RR 0.20, p = 0.48, treatment 0 of 25 (0.0%), control 2 of 25 (8.0%), NNT 12, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). | |
| risk of ICU admission, 37.5% lower, RR 0.62, p = 0.33, treatment 5 of 25 (20.0%), control 8 of 25 (32.0%), NNT 8.3. | |
| hospitalization time, 40.5% lower, relative time 0.60, p = 0.14, treatment 25, control 25. | |
| relative Δ SaO2/FiO2, RR 0.14, p = 0.03, treatment 25, control 25, primary outcome. | |
| Elhadi, 4/30/2021, prospective, Libya, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, study period 29 May, 2020 - 30 December, 2020, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 23.4% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.29, treatment 7 of 15 (46.7%), control 274 of 450 (60.9%), NNT 7.0. |
| Entrenas Castillo, 8/29/2020, Randomized Controlled Trial, Spain, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period May 2020 - June 2020, dosage calcifediol 0.5mg day 1, 0.27mg day 3, 0.27mg day 7, and then weekly until discharge or ICU admission, trial NCT04366908 (history) (COVIDIOL). | risk of death, 85.4% lower, RR 0.15, p = 0.11, treatment 0 of 50 (0.0%), control 2 of 26 (7.7%), NNT 13, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of ICU admission, 94.2% lower, RR 0.06, p = 0.008, treatment 1 of 50 (2.0%), control 13 of 26 (50.0%), NNT 2.1, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Fairfield, 7/26/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period 1 January, 2020 - 31 July, 2021, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: substantial unadjusted confounding by indication likely. | risk of death, 8.9% higher, RR 1.09, p < 0.001, treatment 3,653 of 28,993 (12.6%), control 13,185 of 129,842 (10.2%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 40.8% higher, RR 1.41, p < 0.001, treatment 4,897 of 28,993 (16.9%), control 15,520 of 129,842 (12.0%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Fiore, 5/22/2022, retrospective, matched cohort, Italy, peer-reviewed, mean age 62.5, 10 authors, dosage 100,000IU days 1-2. | risk of death, 92.7% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.01, treatment 3 of 58 (5.2%), control 11 of 58 (19.0%), NNT 7.2, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 50.0% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.36, treatment 4 of 58 (6.9%), control 8 of 58 (13.8%), NNT 14. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 50.0% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.36, treatment 4 of 58 (6.9%), control 8 of 58 (13.8%), NNT 14. | |
| NIV, 47.8% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.04, treatment 12 of 58 (20.7%), control 23 of 58 (39.7%), NNT 5.3. | |
| Ganmaa, 3/12/2026, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, 27 authors, study period 29 December, 2020 - 1 July, 2022, trial NCT04536298 (history) (VIVID). | HCU, 4.0% lower, OR 0.96, p = 0.76, treatment 863, control 884, COVID-19 related HCU, RR approximated with OR. |
| HCU, 3.0% lower, OR 0.97, p = 0.79, treatment 863, control 884, all-cause HCU, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of long COVID, 17.0% lower, OR 0.83, p = 0.24, treatment 863, control 884, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of transmission, 71.0% higher, OR 1.71, p = 0.21, treatment 139, control 138, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Giannini, 1/14/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, dosage 200,000IU days 1-2. | risk of death/ICU, 36.6% lower, RR 0.63, p = 0.13, treatment 14 of 36 (38.9%), control 29 of 55 (52.7%), NNT 7.2, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Güven, 7/23/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, dosage 300,000IU single dose, excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage, ICU patients. | risk of death, 24.8% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.32, treatment 43 of 113 (38.1%), control 30 of 62 (48.4%), NNT 9.7, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Hafez (B), 8/9/2022, retrospective, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, study period April 2020 - June 2020, dosage 50,000IU days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 50,000IU every other day for two weeks or one intramuscular shot of 300,000IU. | risk of death, 93.7% lower, RR 0.06, p = 0.07, treatment 0 of 7 (0.0%), control 12 of 30 (40.0%), NNT 2.5, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), high dose, 50,000IU every other day for two weeks or one intramuscular shot of 300,000IU. |
| risk of death, 58.3% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.28, treatment 2 of 12 (16.7%), control 12 of 30 (40.0%), NNT 4.3, low dose, ≤10,000IU/day. | |
| Hafezi, 10/22/2022, retrospective, United Arab Emirates, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period September 2020 - January 2021, dosage 50,000IU days 1, 8, 15, excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 63.0% lower, HR 0.37, p = 0.04, treatment 8 of 43 (18.6%), control 12 of 37 (32.4%), NNT 7.2, Cox proportional hazards, day 29. |
| Jaun, 4/25/2023, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Switzerland, peer-reviewed, 14 authors, study period December 2020 - August 2021, average treatment delay 8.0 days, dosage 140,000IU single dose. | risk of death, 50.0% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.56, treatment 1 of 39 (2.6%), control 2 of 39 (5.1%), NNT 39, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 300.0% higher, RR 4.00, p = 0.20, treatment 4 of 39 (10.3%), control 1 of 39 (2.6%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 32.1% higher, RR 1.32, p = 0.69, treatment 4 of 39 (10.3%), control 4 of 39 (10.3%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Jevalikar, 12/28/2020, prospective, India, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, dosage 60,000IU single dose, median total dose. | risk of death, 82.0% lower, RR 0.18, p = 0.12, treatment 1 of 128 (0.8%), control 3 of 69 (4.3%), NNT 28. |
| risk of ICU admission, 33.7% lower, RR 0.66, p = 0.29, treatment 16 of 128 (12.5%), control 13 of 69 (18.8%), NNT 16. | |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 31.7% lower, RR 0.68, p = 0.06, treatment 38 of 128 (29.7%), control 30 of 69 (43.5%), NNT 7.3. | |
| Karimpour-Razkenari, 10/3/2022, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, median age 58.5, 9 authors, study period 23 February, 2020 - 23 May, 2020, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 79.0% lower, RR 0.21, p < 0.001, treatment 10 of 124 (8.1%), control 93 of 329 (28.3%), NNT 4.9, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor treatment, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| Karonova (B), 6/23/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, Russia, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, study period 30 November, 2020 - 20 March, 2021, dosage 50,000IU days 1, 8, trial NCT05166005 (history). | risk of ICU admission, 85.9% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.11, treatment 0 of 56 (0.0%), control 3 of 54 (5.6%), NNT 18, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 9. |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 7.0% lower, RR 0.93, p = 0.85, treatment 27 of 56 (48.2%), control 28 of 54 (51.9%), NNT 27, baseline oxygen supplementation was higher in the treatment group, 38 vs. 32, day 9. | |
| Krishnan, 7/20/2020, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 19.0% lower, RR 0.81, p = 0.42, treatment 8 of 16 (50.0%), control 84 of 136 (61.8%), NNT 8.5. |
| Lakkireddy, 7/27/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, India, peer-reviewed, mean age 45.5, 9 authors, dosage 60,000IU days 1-8, 8 or 10 days depending on BMI. | risk of death, 60.9% lower, RR 0.39, p = 0.27, treatment 2 of 44 (4.5%), control 5 of 43 (11.6%), NNT 14. |
| risk of ICU admission, 21.8% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.74, treatment 4 of 44 (9.1%), control 5 of 43 (11.6%), NNT 39. | |
| hospitalization time, 7.1% lower, relative time 0.93, p = 0.90, treatment 44, control 43. | |
| Leal-Martínez, 10/25/2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period 1 September, 2020 - 28 February, 2021, dosage 4,000IU days 1-21, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with comprehensive nutritional support) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial NCT04507867 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: combined treatments may contribute more to the effect seen. | risk of death, 85.7% lower, RR 0.14, p = 0.03, treatment 1 of 40 (2.5%), control 7 of 40 (17.5%), NNT 6.7. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 57.1% lower, RR 0.43, p = 0.31, treatment 3 of 40 (7.5%), control 7 of 40 (17.5%), NNT 10.0. | |
| Ling, 12/11/2020, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, dosage 40,000IU weekly, regimen varied with 77% receiving a total of 40,000IU/week. | risk of death, 79.8% lower, RR 0.20, p < 0.001, treatment 73, control 253, odds ratio converted to relative risk, primary cohort. |
| risk of death, 55.5% lower, RR 0.44, p = 0.02, treatment 80, control 443, odds ratio converted to relative risk, validation cohort. | |
| Lohia (B), 3/4/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 10.7% lower, RR 0.89, p = 0.80, treatment 26, control 69, odds ratio converted to relative risk, <20 ng/mL, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 26.9% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.51, treatment 26, control 69, odds ratio converted to relative risk, <20 ng/mL, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 2.7% lower, RR 0.97, p = 0.93, treatment 26, control 69, odds ratio converted to relative risk, <20 ng/mL, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| Maghbooli, 10/13/2021, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Iran, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, dosage calcifediol 25μg daily, mean daily dose. | risk of death, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.72, treatment 3 of 53 (5.7%), control 5 of 53 (9.4%), NNT 26. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 60.0% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.44, treatment 2 of 53 (3.8%), control 5 of 53 (9.4%), NNT 18. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.42, treatment 6 of 53 (11.3%), control 10 of 53 (18.9%), NNT 13. | |
| ICU time, 36.4% lower, relative time 0.64, p = 0.20, treatment 53, control 53. | |
| hospitalization time, 16.7% lower, relative time 0.83, p = 0.10, treatment 53, control 53. | |
| Mahmood, 12/29/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period 23 March, 2020 - 31 December, 2020, dosage varies, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details; substantial unadjusted confounding by indication likely. | risk of death, 30.5% lower, RR 0.70, p = 0.10, treatment 45 of 238 (18.9%), control 31 of 114 (27.2%), NNT 12, started after admission, late treatment result. |
| Mariani, 5/27/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Argentina, peer-reviewed, mean age 59.1, 33 authors, study period 14 August, 2020 - 22 June, 2021, average treatment delay 7.0 days, dosage 500,000IU single dose, trial NCT04411446 (history) (CARED). | risk of death, 124.0% higher, RR 2.24, p = 0.45, treatment 5 of 115 (4.3%), control 2 of 103 (1.9%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 25.0% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.85, treatment 5 of 115 (4.3%), control 6 of 103 (5.8%), NNT 68. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 27.0% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.62, treatment 9 of 115 (7.8%), control 11 of 103 (10.7%), NNT 35. | |
| risk of progression, 3.0% lower, OR 0.97, p = 0.82, treatment 115, control 103, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, primary outcome, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of progression, 32.8% lower, RR 0.67, p = 0.71, treatment 3 of 115 (2.6%), control 4 of 103 (3.9%), NNT 78, Δ rSOFA 4. | |
| risk of progression, 79.1% higher, RR 1.79, p = 0.30, treatment 10 of 115 (8.7%), control 5 of 103 (4.9%), Δ rSOFA 3. | |
| risk of progression, 25.4% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.76, treatment 5 of 115 (4.3%), control 6 of 103 (5.8%), NNT 68, Δ rSOFA 2. | |
| risk of progression, 16.0% lower, RR 0.84, p = 0.70, treatment 15 of 115 (13.0%), control 16 of 103 (15.5%), NNT 40, Δ rSOFA 1. | |
| Mazziotti, 3/5/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 19.0% lower, OR 0.81, p = 0.49, treatment 116, control 232, supplementation, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 67.0% higher, OR 1.67, p = 0.08, treatment 116, control 232, supplementation, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Milan, 4/30/2024, retrospective, Philippines, peer-reviewed, median age 11.0, 5 authors, study period 1 April, 2020 - 31 August, 2021. | risk of death, 46.5% lower, RR 0.53, p = 0.18, treatment 9 of 122 (7.4%), control 8 of 58 (13.8%), NNT 16, day 45. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 20.8% lower, RR 0.79, p = 0.53, treatment 20 of 122 (16.4%), control 12 of 58 (20.7%), NNT 23, day 45. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 15.9% lower, RR 0.84, p = 0.69, treatment 23 of 122 (18.9%), control 13 of 58 (22.4%), NNT 28, day 45. | |
| Mingiano, 7/30/2023, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period November 2020 - February 2021, dosage calcifediol 450μg days 1-2, patients with deficiency only. | risk of death, 38.8% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.04, treatment 13 of 56 (23.2%), control 88 of 232 (37.9%), NNT 6.8. |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 23.1% lower, RR 0.77, p = 0.22, treatment 18 of 56 (32.1%), control 97 of 232 (41.8%), NNT 10. | |
| hospitalization time, 34.6% lower, relative time 0.65, p = 0.01, treatment 56, control 232. | |
| Murai, 11/17/2020, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 17 authors, study period 2 June, 2020 - 27 August, 2020, average treatment delay 10.2 days, dosage 200,000IU single dose, trial NCT04449718 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage, >50% on oxygen/ventilation at baseline; very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | risk of death, 48.7% higher, RR 1.49, p = 0.43, treatment 9 of 119 (7.6%), control 6 of 118 (5.1%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 47.5% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.09, treatment 9 of 119 (7.6%), control 17 of 118 (14.4%), NNT 15. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 24.6% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.30, treatment 19 of 119 (16.0%), control 25 of 118 (21.2%), NNT 19. | |
| risk of no hospital discharge, 6.5% lower, HR 0.93, p = 0.63, treatment 119, control 118, inverted to make HR<1 favor treatment. | |
| Nogués, 1/22/2021, prospective quasi-randomized (ward), Spain, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, dosage calcifediol 0.5mg day 1, 0.27mg day 3, 0.27mg day 7, 0.27mg day 15, 0.27mg day 30. | risk of death, 79.0% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.001, treatment 21 of 447 (4.7%), control 62 of 391 (15.9%), NNT 9.0, adjusted per study, ITT. |
| risk of death, 48.0% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.001, treatment 500, control 338, adjusted per study, including patients treated later. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 87.0% lower, RR 0.13, p < 0.001, treatment 20 of 447 (4.5%), control 82 of 391 (21.0%), NNT 6.1, adjusted per study, ITT. | |
| Ogasawara, 9/1/2023, retrospective, Japan, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period April 2021 - September 2022, dosage alfacalcidol 1μg days 1-8, median duration, alfacalcidol and eldecalcitol used. | risk of death, 66.7% lower, RR 0.33, p = 1.00, treatment 0 of 54 (0.0%), control 1 of 54 (1.9%), NNT 54, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of progression, 77.8% lower, RR 0.22, p = 0.05, treatment 2 of 54 (3.7%), control 9 of 54 (16.7%), NNT 7.7, high-flow oxygen, mechanical ventilation, or mortality, primary outcome. | |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 75.0% lower, RR 0.25, p = 0.09, treatment 2 of 54 (3.7%), control 8 of 54 (14.8%), NNT 9.0. | |
| Rastogi, 11/12/2020, Randomized Controlled Trial, India, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, dosage 60,000IU days 1-7, trial NCT04459247 (history) (SHADE). | risk of no viral clearance, 52.6% lower, RR 0.47, p = 0.02, treatment 6 of 16 (37.5%), control 19 of 24 (79.2%), NNT 2.4. |
| Sabico, 6/24/2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, study period 29 July, 2020 - 22 November, 2020. | risk of death, 192.1% higher, RR 2.92, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 38 (2.6%), control 0 of 35 (0.0%), continuity correction due to zero event (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of ICU admission, 38.9% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.66, treatment 2 of 36 (5.6%), control 3 of 33 (9.1%), NNT 28. | |
| time to discharge, 14.3% lower, relative time 0.86, p = 0.14, treatment 36, control 33. | |
| recovery time, 14.1% lower, relative time 0.86, p = 0.97, treatment 36, control 33, fever. | |
| recovery time, 20.5% lower, relative time 0.79, p = 0.24, treatment 36, control 33, dyspnea. | |
| Saheb Sharif-Askari (B), 8/24/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage 50,000IU days 1, 8, 15, excluded in exclusion analyses: very late stage study using cholecalciferol instead of calcifediol or calcitriol. | ICU time, 35.7% lower, relative time 0.64, p = 0.01, treatment 20, control 25. |
| Salman, 6/16/2023, Randomized Controlled Trial, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period January 2021 - May 2021, dosage 4,000IU days 1-14. | risk of death, 60.0% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.07, treatment 6 of 150 (4.0%), control 15 of 150 (10.0%), NNT 17. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 16.7% lower, RR 0.83, p = 0.55, treatment 25 of 150 (16.7%), control 30 of 150 (20.0%), NNT 30. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 12.5% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.85, treatment 14 of 150 (9.3%), control 16 of 150 (10.7%), NNT 75. | |
| hospitalization time, 18.2% lower, relative time 0.82, p = 0.001, treatment 150, control 150. | |
| recovery time, 22.2% lower, relative time 0.78, p = 0.001, treatment 150, control 150. | |
| Sanz, 6/12/2024, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Argentina, peer-reviewed, mean age 59.0, 7 authors, study period August 2021 - June 2022, dosage 10,000IU days 1-10. | risk of death, 80.0% lower, RR 0.20, p = 0.48, treatment 0 of 11 (0.0%), control 2 of 11 (18.2%), NNT 5.5, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 83.3% lower, RR 0.17, p = 0.06, treatment 1 of 11 (9.1%), control 6 of 11 (54.5%), NNT 2.2. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 60.0% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.36, treatment 2 of 11 (18.2%), control 5 of 11 (45.5%), NNT 3.7. | |
| Sarhan, 9/27/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period December 2020 - June 2021, dosage 200,000IU single dose, trial NCT04738760 (history). | risk of death, 18.5% lower, RR 0.81, p = 0.003, treatment 26 of 58 (44.8%), control 30 of 58 (51.7%), NNT 14, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| improvement, 74.4% better, OR 0.26, p = 0.03, treatment 58, control 58, adjusted per study, inverted to make OR<1 favor treatment, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| time to improvement, 28.8% lower, relative time 0.71, p = 0.002, treatment 58, control 58. | |
| hospitalization time, 31.5% lower, relative time 0.69, p = 0.04, treatment 58, control 58. | |
| Seely, 9/22/2023, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Canada, peer-reviewed, mean age 39.9, 10 authors, study period September 2021 - April 2022, dosage 51,000IU day 1, 1,000IU days 2-21, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with vitamin C, D, K2, and zinc) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial NCT04780061 (history). | ER visit, 47.6% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.68, treatment 2 of 42 (4.8%), control 4 of 44 (9.1%), NNT 23. |
| relative mean cumulative symptom score, 13.8% better, RR 0.86, p = 0.41, treatment mean 166.3 (±92.3) n=34, control mean 192.9 (±153.6) n=24. | |
| EQ-VAS average score <80, 29.4% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.54, treatment 7 of 34 (20.6%), control 7 of 24 (29.2%), NNT 12, average daily EQ-VAS score <80. | |
| relative EQ5D improvement, 28.6% better, RR 0.71, p = 0.44, treatment 32, control 31, relative improvement in EQ5D, week 1. | |
| relative EQ5D improvement, 14.3% better, RR 0.86, p = 0.73, treatment 33, control 30, relative improvement in EQ5D, week 2. | |
| relative EQ5D improvement, 50.0% better, RR 0.50, p = 0.17, treatment 32, control 33, relative improvement in EQ5D, week 3. | |
| relative EQ5D improvement, 12.5% worse, RR 1.12, p = 0.47, treatment 30, control 25, relative improvement in EQ5D, week 4. | |
| recovery time, 4.0% higher, relative time 1.04, p = 0.81, treatment 34, control 24. | |
| risk of long COVID, 12.1% lower, RR 0.88, p = 1.00, treatment 3 of 33 (9.1%), control 3 of 29 (10.3%), NNT 80, 12 weeks. | |
| risk of long COVID, 35.7% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.69, treatment 3 of 35 (8.6%), control 4 of 30 (13.3%), NNT 21, 8 weeks. | |
| risk of long COVID, 0.6% lower, RR 0.99, p = 1.00, treatment 6 of 35 (17.1%), control 5 of 29 (17.2%), NNT 1015, 4 weeks. | |
| Shahid, 6/17/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 2 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: minimal details provided. | risk of death, 38.0% lower, RR 0.62, p < 0.001, treatment 705, control 773. |
| Shamsi, 7/17/2023, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 1 August, 2021, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 57.5% lower, RR 0.42, p = 0.70, treatment 1 of 17 (5.9%), control 23 of 166 (13.9%), NNT 13. |
| Singh, 6/1/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, India, peer-reviewed, 15 authors, study period 1 August, 2021 - 10 December, 2021, dosage 600,000IU single dose, trial NCT04952857 (history) (Shade-S). | risk of death, 45.0% lower, RR 0.55, p = 0.046, treatment 11 of 45 (24.4%), control 20 of 45 (44.4%), NNT 5.0. |
| risk of no recovery, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.01, treatment 45, control 45. | |
| Soliman, 9/1/2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Egypt, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, dosage 200,000IU single dose. | risk of death, 63.4% lower, RR 0.37, p = 0.21, treatment 7 of 40 (17.5%), control 3 of 16 (18.8%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, logistic regression. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 20.0% lower, RR 0.80, p = 0.56, treatment 14 of 40 (35.0%), control 7 of 16 (43.8%), NNT 11, unadjusted. | |
| risk of no recovery, 20.0% lower, RR 0.80, p = 0.56, treatment 14 of 40 (35.0%), control 7 of 16 (43.8%), NNT 11, unadjusted. | |
| Sümegi, 1/30/2025, retrospective, Hungary, peer-reviewed, mean age 67.5, 8 authors, study period December 2022 - April 2023, dosage 30,000IU days 1-3, 3,000IU days 4-28, 30,000IU for 3 days or 12,000IU for 7 days, followed by 3,000IU daily. | risk of death, 67.3% lower, RR 0.33, p < 0.001, treatment 10 of 76 (13.2%), control 29 of 72 (40.3%), NNT 3.7. |
| Tan (C), 6/10/2020, retrospective, Singapore, peer-reviewed, 14 authors, dosage 1,000IU daily, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with magnesium and vitamin B12) - results of individual treatments may vary. | risk of oxygen therapy, 80.5% lower, RR 0.20, p = 0.04, treatment 3 of 17 (17.6%), control 16 of 26 (61.5%), NNT 2.3, adjusted per study, multivariate. |
| risk of ICU admission, 80.9% lower, RR 0.19, p = 0.07, treatment 1 of 17 (5.9%), control 8 of 26 (30.8%), NNT 4.0, no adjusted result available. | |
| Taslim, 5/1/2023, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Indonesia, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period 1 April, 2021 - 30 September, 2021, trial NCT05126602 (history). | risk of oxygen therapy, 71.4% lower, RR 0.29, p = 0.01, treatment 4 of 30 (13.3%), control 14 of 30 (46.7%), NNT 3.0. |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 66.7% lower, RR 0.33, p = 0.61, treatment 1 of 30 (3.3%), control 3 of 30 (10.0%), NNT 15, mask. | |
| risk of oxygen therapy, 72.7% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.03, treatment 3 of 30 (10.0%), control 11 of 30 (36.7%), NNT 3.8, nasal cannula. | |
| risk of no recovery, 60.0% lower, RR 0.40, p = 0.42, treatment 2 of 30 (6.7%), control 5 of 30 (16.7%), NNT 10.0, fever. | |
| hospitalization time, 21.0% lower, relative time 0.79, p < 0.001, treatment mean 11.63 (±2.5) n=30, control mean 14.73 (±3.45) n=30. | |
| time to viral-, 37.6% lower, relative time 0.62, p < 0.001, treatment mean 6.53 (±1.17) n=30, control mean 10.47 (±2.56) n=30, primary outcome. | |
| Torres, 4/14/2022, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Spain, peer-reviewed, median age 65.0, 51 authors, study period June 2020 - March 2021, average treatment delay 7.0 days, dosage 10,000IU days 1-14. | risk of death, 7.3% higher, RR 1.07, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 41 (2.4%), control 1 of 44 (2.3%). |
| risk of ICU admission, 57.1% lower, RR 0.43, p = 0.44, treatment 2 of 41 (4.9%), control 5 of 44 (11.4%), NNT 15. | |
| risk of ARDS, 28.5% lower, RR 0.72, p = 0.74, treatment 4 of 41 (9.8%), control 6 of 44 (13.6%), NNT 26. | |
| Vasconcelos, 2/19/2025, retrospective, Portugal, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, study period 14 April, 2020 - 31 October, 2020, dosage 125,000IU days 1-2. | risk of death, 73.2% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.02, treatment 9 of 72 (12.5%), control 18 of 54 (33.3%), NNT 4.8, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, 60 days after discharge, multivariable. |
| risk of death, 66.7% lower, RR 0.33, p = 0.04, treatment 9 of 72 (12.5%), control 16 of 54 (29.6%), NNT 5.8, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, in hospital, multivariable. | |
| risk of death, 86.9% lower, RR 0.13, p = 0.006, treatment 3 of 72 (4.2%), control 13 of 54 (24.1%), NNT 5.0, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, in ICU, multivariable. | |
| Yildiz, 9/27/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, dosage 300,000IU single dose. | risk of death, 80.9% lower, RR 0.19, p = 0.04, treatment 1 of 37 (2.7%), control 24 of 170 (14.1%), NNT 8.8. |
| risk of ICU admission, 94.5% lower, RR 0.06, p = 0.13, treatment 0 of 37 (0.0%), control 14 of 170 (8.2%), NNT 12, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). | |
| hospitalization time, 9.6% lower, relative time 0.90, p = 0.32, treatment 37, control 170. | |
| Zangeneh, 5/13/2022, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: data issues pending author response. | risk of death, 26.0% higher, HR 1.26, p = 0.40, Cox proportional hazards. |
| Zurita-Cruz, 7/25/2022, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Mexico, peer-reviewed, median age 12.0, 7 authors, study period 24 March, 2020 - 31 March, 2021, dosage 2,000IU daily, daily, 1,000IU for children <1 year, trial NCT04502667 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: randomization resulted in significant baseline differences that were not adjusted for. | risk of death, 79.2% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.11, treatment 1 of 20 (5.0%), control 6 of 25 (24.0%), NNT 5.3. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 72.2% lower, RR 0.28, p = 0.08, treatment 2 of 20 (10.0%), control 9 of 25 (36.0%), NNT 3.8. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 73.2% lower, RR 0.27, p = 0.006, treatment 3 of 20 (15.0%), control 14 of 25 (56.0%), NNT 2.4. |
| Abdulateef, 4/8/2021, retrospective, Iraq, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, study period July 2020 - August 2020, dosage varies, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of hospitalization, 40.9% lower, RR 0.59, p = 0.30, treatment 6 of 127 (4.7%), control 24 of 300 (8.0%), NNT 31, unadjusted. |
| Ahmed (B), 11/21/2021, retrospective, USA, preprint, 5 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 10.5% lower, RR 0.90, p = 0.28. |
| Akbar, 11/7/2023, retrospective, Qatar, peer-reviewed, mean age 40.3, 9 authors, study period March 2020 - September 2020, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 19.0% lower, OR 0.81, p = 0.02, treatment 2,402, control 7,598, adjusted per study, multivariable, model 2, RR approximated with OR. |
| Aldwihi, 5/11/2021, retrospective, Saudi Arabia, peer-reviewed, survey, mean age 36.5, 8 authors, study period August 2020 - October 2020, dosage not specified. | risk of hospitalization, 49.3% higher, RR 1.49, p = 0.002, treatment 94 of 259 (36.3%), control 143 of 479 (29.9%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| Annweiler (D), 11/2/2020, retrospective, France, peer-reviewed, mean age 88.0, 7 authors, dosage 50,000IU monthly, dose varies - 50,000 IU/month, or 80,000IU/100,000IU every 2-3 months. | risk of death, 93.0% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.02, treatment 2 of 29 (6.9%), control 10 of 32 (31.2%), NNT 4.1, adjusted per study, regular bolus supplementation. |
| Arboleda, 3/13/2024, prospective, Colombia, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage 5,000IU daily, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with vitamin C) - results of individual treatments may vary, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of case, 35.7% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.03, treatment 26 of 214 (12.1%), control 115 of 609 (18.9%), NNT 15. |
| Arroyo-Díaz, 9/24/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 12.4% higher, RR 1.12, p = 0.59, treatment 50 of 189 (26.5%), control 167 of 1,078 (15.5%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 43.3% lower, RR 0.57, p = 0.22, treatment 11 of 189 (5.8%), control 113 of 1,078 (10.5%), NNT 21, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 44.2% lower, RR 0.56, p = 0.03, treatment 13 of 189 (6.9%), control 133 of 1,078 (12.3%), NNT 18, unadjusted. | |
| hospitalization time, 11.8% lower, relative time 0.88, p = 0.20, treatment 189, control 1,078, unadjusted. | |
| Aweimer, 3/29/2023, retrospective, Germany, peer-reviewed, median age 67.0, 19 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 31 August, 2021, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 20.9% lower, RR 0.79, p = 0.31, treatment 7 of 12 (58.3%), control 101 of 137 (73.7%), NNT 6.5. |
| Bagheri, 9/1/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of severe case, 70.9% lower, OR 0.29, p = 0.02, treatment 131, control 379, adjusted per study, multinomial logistic regression, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of hospitalization, 37.9% lower, RR 0.62, p = 0.11, treatment 28 of 131 (21.4%), control 143 of 379 (37.7%), NNT 6.1, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor treatment, odds ratio converted to relative risk, binary logistic regression. | |
| Baralić, 4/24/2023, prospective, France, peer-reviewed, 15 authors, study period March 2020 - September 2022, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 66.8% lower, HR 0.33, p = 0.02, treatment 7 of 31 (22.6%), control 11 of 21 (52.4%), NNT 3.4, Cox proportional hazards. |
| Bhat, 3/6/2023, prospective, placebo-controlled, India, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, dosage calcifediol 50μg days 1-180, trial CTRI/2021/08/035709. | risk of symptomatic case, 34.2% lower, RR 0.66, p = 0.01, treatment 59 of 262 (22.5%), control 52 of 152 (34.2%), NNT 8.6. |
| Blanch-Rubió, 10/20/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 66.4, 11 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 8.0% lower, RR 0.92, p = 0.68, treatment 62 of 1,303 (4.8%), control 47 of 799 (5.9%), adjusted per study. |
| Brunvoll, 9/7/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Norway, peer-reviewed, mean age 44.9, 15 authors, study period 10 November, 2020 - 2 June, 2021, dosage 400IU daily, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with cod liver oil) - results of individual treatments may vary, trial NCT04609423 (history). | risk of ICU admission, 0.3% higher, RR 1.00, p = 1.00, treatment 4 of 17,278 (0.0%), control 4 of 17,323 (0.0%). |
| risk of hospitalization, 10.9% lower, RR 0.89, p = 1.00, treatment 8 of 17,278 (0.0%), control 9 of 17,323 (0.1%), NNT 17692. | |
| risk of severe case, 20.0% higher, RR 1.20, p = 0.17, treatment 121 of 17,278 (0.7%), control 101 of 17,323 (0.6%). | |
| risk of case, no change, RR 1.00, p = 0.98, treatment 227 of 17,278 (1.3%), control 228 of 17,323 (1.3%), NNT 42377. | |
| Campi, 6/14/2021, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: significant unadjusted differences between groups. | risk of severe case, 88.4% lower, OR 0.12, p < 0.001, treatment 31 of 103 (30.1%) cases, 41 of 52 (78.8%) controls, NNT 2.3, case control OR, vitamin D supplementation, hospitalized patients vs. controls. |
| Cangiano, 12/22/2020, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 14 authors, dosage 25,000IU 2x per month. | risk of death, 70.0% lower, RR 0.30, p = 0.04, treatment 3 of 20 (15.0%), control 39 of 78 (50.0%), NNT 2.9. |
| Cereda, 11/11/2020, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, mean age 68.8, 7 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 73.0% higher, RR 1.73, p = 0.14, treatment 7 of 18 (38.9%), control 40 of 152 (26.3%), odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥25,000IU/month for at least 3 months. |
| risk of hospitalization, 17.3% higher, RR 1.17, p = 0.68, treatment 7 of 27 (25.9%), control 36 of 170 (21.2%), odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| Comunale, 1/24/2024, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, study period November 2020 - May 2021, dosage not specified, trial NCT04639375 (history). | risk of symptomatic case, 91.0% lower, OR 0.09, p < 0.001, treatment 100, control 182, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of case, 88.0% lower, OR 0.12, p = 0.001, treatment 100, control 182, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| De Nicolò, 12/29/2022, prospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period January 2021 - April 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of IgG positive, 88.4% lower, OR 0.12, p = 0.002, treatment 43, control 63, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| di Filippo (C), 6/10/2026, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, study period January 2021 - December 2021, trial NCT06452082 (history). | risk of symptomatic case, 50.0% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.12, treatment 7 of 39 (17.9%), control 14 of 39 (35.9%), NNT 5.6, matched population. |
| risk of symptomatic case, 49.7% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.04, treatment 12 of 70 (17.1%), control 15 of 44 (34.1%), NNT 5.9, all patients. | |
| di Filippo (B), 3/23/2026, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, study period March 2020 - May 2021, trial NCT06452082 (history), excluded in exclusion analyses: potentially significant confounding by treatment propensity. | risk of long COVID, 78.0% lower, OR 0.22, p = 0.02, treatment 43, control 43, adjusted per study, Table 6, RR approximated with OR. |
| Dudley, 5/18/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 5 authors, dosage 800IU daily. | risk of symptomatic case, 22.4% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.65, treatment 15 of 58 (25.9%), control 2 of 6 (33.3%), NNT 13, positive test. |
| Fasano, 6/2/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 42.0% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.048, treatment 13 of 329 (4.0%), control 92 of 1,157 (8.0%), NNT 25, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Gibbons, 11/12/2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 33.3% lower, HR 0.67, p < 0.001, treatment 5,315 of 199,498 (2.7%), control 6,591 of 199,498 (3.3%), D3, propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of death, 23.5% lower, HR 0.77, p = 0.10, treatment 716 of 33,216 (2.2%), control 987 of 33,216 (3.0%), NNT 123, D2, propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of case, 20.3% lower, HR 0.80, p < 0.001, treatment 462 of 199,498 (0.2%), control 689 of 199,498 (0.3%), D3, propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of case, 28.0% lower, HR 0.72, p < 0.001, treatment 65 of 33,216 (0.2%), control 86 of 33,216 (0.3%), NNT 1582, D2, propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| Golabi (B), 8/26/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 25.4% higher, OR 1.25, p = 0.56, treatment 28 of 53 (52.8%) cases, 25 of 53 (47.2%) controls, case control OR. |
| Guldemir, 11/16/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, study period 30 March, 2020 - 23 September, 2020, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of hospitalization, 5.2% lower, RR 0.95, p = 0.89 (Fisher's exact test), treatment 19 of 81 (23.5%), control 98 of 396 (24.7%), NNT 77. |
| Hernández (B), 10/27/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 60.9, 12 authors, dosage varies. | risk of death, 3.7% higher, RR 1.04, p = 1.00, treatment 2 of 19 (10.5%), control 20 of 197 (10.2%). |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 75.9% lower, RR 0.24, p = 0.13, treatment 1 of 19 (5.3%), control 43 of 197 (21.8%), NNT 6.0. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 79.3% lower, RR 0.21, p = 0.05, treatment 1 of 19 (5.3%), control 50 of 197 (25.4%), NNT 5.0. | |
| hospitalization time, 33.3% lower, relative time 0.67, p = 0.11, treatment 19, control 197. | |
| Holt, 3/30/2021, prospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 34 authors, study period 1 May, 2020 - 5 February, 2021, dosage not specified, trial NCT04330599 (history) (COVIDENCE UK), excluded in exclusion analyses: significant unadjusted confounding possible. | risk of case, 6.8% lower, RR 0.93, p = 0.53, treatment 141 of 5,640 (2.5%), control 305 of 9,587 (3.2%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, fully adjusted, group sizes approximated. |
| Hosseini (C), 7/19/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Canada, preprint, mean age 39.5, 9 authors, study period 8 February, 2021 - 4 May, 2021, dosage 100,000IU day 1, 10,000IU day 7, 10,000IU day 14, 10,000IU day 21, 10,000IU day 28, 100,000IU cholecalciferol at baseline, 10,000IU weekly for 16 weeks, trial NCT04483635 (history) (PROTECT). | risk of case, 81.9% lower, RR 0.18, p = 0.19, treatment 0 of 19 (0.0%), control 2 of 15 (13.3%), NNT 7.5, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| Israel (B), 7/27/2021, retrospective, Israel, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of hospitalization, 13.1% lower, OR 0.87, p = 0.003, treatment 737 of 6,953 (10.6%) cases, 1,669 of 13,906 (12.0%) controls, NNT 33, case control OR, PCR+, cohort 2. |
| Jabeen, 5/11/2022, prospective, Pakistan, peer-reviewed, 7 authors, dosage 200,000IU single dose. | risk of symptomatic case, 88.9% lower, RR 0.11, p = 0.11, treatment 0 of 20 (0.0%), control 4 of 20 (20.0%), NNT 5.0, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| Jimenez, 7/26/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, study period 12 March, 2020 - 21 May, 2020, dosage paricalcitol 0.9μg weekly. | risk of death, 50.1% lower, HR 0.50, p = 0.02, treatment 16 of 94 (17.0%), control 65 of 191 (34.0%), NNT 5.9, adjusted per study, paricalcitol treatment, multivariate Cox regression. |
| risk of death, 50.7% lower, HR 0.49, p = 0.003, all vitamin D derivatives, univariate. | |
| Jolliffe, 3/23/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, median age 60.2, 25 authors, study period December 2020 - June 2021, dosage 3,200IU daily, daily, trial NCT04579640 (history) (CORONAVIT). | risk of mechanical ventilation, 94.7% higher, RR 1.95, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 1,515 (0.1%), control 1 of 2,949 (0.0%), 3200IU/day. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 94.7% higher, RR 1.95, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 1,515 (0.1%), control 1 of 2,949 (0.0%), 800IU/day. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 41.1% higher, RR 1.41, p = 0.16, treatment 29 of 1,515 (1.9%), control 40 of 2,949 (1.4%), 3200IU/day. | |
| risk of hospitalization, 16.8% higher, RR 1.17, p = 0.60, treatment 24 of 1,515 (1.6%), control 40 of 2,949 (1.4%), 800IU/day. | |
| risk of case, 8.8% higher, RR 1.09, p = 0.55, treatment 76 of 1,515 (5.0%), control 136 of 2,949 (4.6%), 3200IU/day. | |
| risk of case, 24.5% higher, RR 1.25, p = 0.11, treatment 87 of 1,515 (5.7%), control 136 of 2,949 (4.6%), 800IU/day. | |
| risk of case, 12.3% higher, RR 1.12, p = 0.56, treatment 45 of 1,515 (3.0%), control 78 of 2,949 (2.6%), confirmed, 3200IU/day. | |
| risk of case, 37.3% higher, RR 1.37, p = 0.08, treatment 55 of 1,515 (3.6%), control 78 of 2,949 (2.6%), confirmed, 800IU/day. | |
| Junior, 2/17/2022, prospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 22.1% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.61, treatment 8 of 113 (7.1%), control 8 of 88 (9.1%), NNT 50. |
| risk of progression, 30.8% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.26, treatment 16 of 113 (14.2%), control 18 of 88 (20.5%), NNT 16, respiratory failure. | |
| Karonova, 1/24/2022, Randomized Controlled Trial, Russia, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, study period 30 October, 2020 - 28 February, 2021. | risk of symptomatic case, 94.6% lower, RR 0.05, p = 0.002, treatment 0 of 38 (0.0%), control 9 of 40 (22.5%), NNT 4.4, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| risk of case, 41.5% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.10, treatment 10 of 38 (26.3%), control 18 of 40 (45.0%), NNT 5.4. | |
| Levitus, 5/3/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 9 authors, dosage varies. | risk of severe case, 30.8% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.25, treatment 65, control 64, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥1,000IU, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. |
| risk of severe case, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.15, treatment 65, control 64, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥5,000IU, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| risk of severe case, no change, RR 1.00, p = 0.92, treatment 65, control 64, odds ratio converted to relative risk, ≥50,000IU, control prevalence approximated with overall prevalence. | |
| Levy, 1/31/2022, retrospective, Israel, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death/hospitalization, 30.0% lower, HR 0.70, p = 0.05, treatment 39 of 208 (18.8%), control 168 of 641 (26.2%), NNT 13, adjusted per study, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards, day 40. |
| Louca, 11/30/2020, retrospective, population-based cohort, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, mean age 49.6, 26 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 7.5% lower, RR 0.92, p < 0.001, odds ratio converted to relative risk, United Kingdom, all adjustment model. |
| Loucera, 4/29/2021, retrospective, propensity score matching, Spain, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, dosage varies (calcifediol). | risk of death, 33.0% lower, HR 0.67, p = 0.009, treatment 374, control 374, calcifediol, <15 days before hospitalization, Cox model with inverse propensity weighting. |
| risk of death, 27.0% lower, HR 0.73, p = 0.02, treatment 439, control 439, calcifediol, <30 days before hospitalization, Cox model with inverse propensity weighting. | |
| risk of death, 25.0% lower, HR 0.75, p = 0.005, treatment 570, control 570, cholecalciferol, <15 days before hospitalization, Cox model with inverse propensity weighting. | |
| risk of death, 12.0% lower, HR 0.88, p = 0.11, treatment 802, control 802, cholecalciferol, <30 days before hospitalization, Cox model with inverse propensity weighting. | |
| Lázaro, 9/5/2021, retrospective, Spain, preprint, 9 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: very few events; unadjusted results with no group details; minimal details provided. | risk of case, 26.8% lower, RR 0.73, p = 1.00, treatment 1 of 97 (1.0%), control 2 of 142 (1.4%), NNT 265. |
| Ma, 12/3/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period May 2020 - March 2021, dosage varies. | risk of hospitalization, 49.0% lower, OR 0.51, p = 0.04, treatment 26,605, control 12,710, adjusted per study, supplementation ≥400 IU/day, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of symptomatic case, 7.0% higher, OR 1.07, p = 0.25, treatment 7,895, control 31,420, adjusted per study, supplementation ≥2000 IU/day vs. <400 IU/day, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of case, 17.0% lower, OR 0.83, p = 0.07, treatment 7,895, control 31,420, adjusted per study, supplementation ≥2000 IU/day vs. <400 IU/day, model 3, supplemental table 3, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Ma (B), 1/29/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 30.0% lower, RR 0.70, p = 0.03, treatment 49 of 363 (13.5%), control 1,329 of 7,934 (16.8%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| Mahmood, 12/29/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period 23 March, 2020 - 31 December, 2020, dosage varies, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details; substantial unadjusted confounding by indication likely. | risk of death, 9.4% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.67, treatment 34 of 138 (24.6%), control 31 of 114 (27.2%), NNT 39, prescribed by GP. |
| Meltzer, 12/10/2025, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, USA, peer-reviewed, 11 authors, study period 5 December, 2020 - 23 May, 2023, dosage 4,000IU daily, trial NCT04868903 (history). | risk of case, 27.0% lower, HR 0.73, p = 0.09, treatment 461, control 462, adjusted per study, 4,000 IU and 10,000 IU vs. 400 IU, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. |
| risk of case, 38.0% lower, HR 0.62, p = 0.04, treatment 299, control 300, adjusted per study, 4,000 IU vs. 400 IU, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of case, 1.0% lower, HR 0.99, p = 0.98, treatment 162, control 162, adjusted per study, 10,000 IU vs. 400 IU, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards. | |
| risk of symptomatic case, 63.0% lower, OR 0.37, p = 0.06, treatment 36, control 50, symptomatic COVID-19 among seroconverters, 4,000 IU vs. 400 IU, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of symptomatic case, 38.0% lower, OR 0.62, p = 0.26, treatment 58, control 72, symptomatic COVID-19 among seroconverters, pooled 4,000 IU and 10,000 IU vs 400 IU, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Meltzer (D), 3/19/2021, retrospective, database analysis, USA, peer-reviewed, 6 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 36.0% lower, RR 0.64, p = 0.38, treatment 6 of 131 (4.6%), control 239 of 3,338 (7.2%), NNT 39, ≥2,000IU/d. |
| risk of case, 31.1% lower, RR 0.69, p = 0.16, treatment 15 of 304 (4.9%), control 239 of 3,338 (7.2%), NNT 45, ≥1,001IU/d. | |
| risk of case, 8.9% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.56, treatment 60 of 920 (6.5%), control 239 of 3,338 (7.2%), NNT 157, ≥1IU/d. | |
| Mohseni, 8/4/2021, retrospective, Iran, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of case, 12.4% lower, RR 0.88, p = 0.09, treatment 99 of 192 (51.6%), control 242 of 411 (58.9%), NNT 14. |
| Nimer, 2/28/2022, retrospective, Jordan, peer-reviewed, survey, 4 authors, study period March 2021 - July 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of hospitalization, 33.3% lower, RR 0.67, p = 0.001, treatment 66 of 796 (8.3%), control 153 of 1,352 (11.3%), NNT 33, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| risk of severe case, 29.0% lower, RR 0.71, p = 0.01, treatment 81 of 796 (10.2%), control 179 of 1,352 (13.2%), NNT 33, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. | |
| Oristrell, 7/17/2021, retrospective, population-based cohort, Spain, peer-reviewed, 8 authors, dosage varies (calcifediol). | risk of death, 1.0% higher, RR 1.01, p = 0.91, calcifediol, univariate. |
| risk of death, 4.0% lower, RR 0.96, p = 0.37, cholecalciferol, univariate. | |
| risk of case, 1.0% lower, RR 0.99, p = 0.65, NNT 3499, calcifediol, univariate. | |
| risk of case, 5.0% lower, RR 0.95, p = 0.004, cholecalciferol, multivariate. | |
| Oristrell (B), 4/6/2021, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage calcitriol 0.3μg daily, mean daily dose. | risk of death, 43.0% lower, HR 0.57, p = 0.001, treatment 2,296, control 3,407, multivariate, patients with CKD stages 4-5. |
| risk of severe case, 43.0% lower, HR 0.57, p < 0.001, treatment 2,296, control 3,407, multivariate, patients with CKD stages 4-5. | |
| risk of case, 22.0% lower, HR 0.78, p = 0.01, treatment 163 of 2,296 (7.1%), control 326 of 3,407 (9.6%), NNT 40, multivariate, patients with CKD stages 4-5. | |
| Parant, 4/14/2022, retrospective, France, peer-reviewed, median age 78.0, 12 authors, study period 1 March, 2020 - 30 June, 2020, dosage varies, trial NCT04877509 (history). | risk of death, 50.5% lower, RR 0.50, p = 0.11, treatment 7 of 66 (10.6%), control 28 of 162 (17.3%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| risk of ICU admission, 51.2% lower, RR 0.49, p = 0.008, treatment 10 of 66 (15.2%), control 74 of 162 (45.7%), NNT 3.3, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. | |
| risk of severe case, 38.7% lower, RR 0.61, p = 0.01, treatment 19 of 66 (28.8%), control 86 of 162 (53.1%), NNT 4.1, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. | |
| Pecina, 8/27/2021, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of death, 70.0% higher, OR 1.70, p = 0.52, treatment 29, control 63, supplementation, unadjusted, RR approximated with OR. |
| risk of mechanical ventilation, 10.0% higher, OR 1.10, p = 0.89, treatment 29, control 63, supplementation, unadjusted, RR approximated with OR. | |
| risk of ICU admission, 30.0% higher, OR 1.30, p = 0.61, treatment 29, control 63, supplementation, unadjusted, RR approximated with OR. | |
| Regalia, 1/13/2022, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage varies. | risk of case, 33.0% lower, OR 0.67, p = 0.21, treatment 32 of 60 (53.3%) cases, 75 of 119 (63.0%) controls, NNT 11, case control OR, vitamin D supplementation for ≥3 months in the last year. |
| Sainz-Amo, 10/24/2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, mean age 74.5, 13 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of severe case, 32.7% lower, OR 0.67, p = 0.45, treatment 5 of 29 (17.2%) cases, 43 of 182 (23.6%) controls, NNT 23, case control OR. |
| risk of case, 43.7% lower, OR 0.56, p = 0.23, treatment 6 of 39 (15.4%) cases, 42 of 172 (24.4%) controls, NNT 13, case control OR. | |
| Sharif, 11/26/2022, retrospective, Bangladesh, peer-reviewed, 14 authors, study period 13 December, 2020 - 4 February, 2021, dosage 2,000IU daily. | risk of severe case, 28.0% lower, OR 0.72, p = 0.001, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR. |
| Shehab, 2/28/2022, retrospective, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, survey, 7 authors, study period September 2020 - March 2021, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: unadjusted results with no group details. | risk of severe case, 45.7% lower, RR 0.54, p = 0.20, treatment 6 of 90 (6.7%), control 20 of 163 (12.3%), NNT 18, unadjusted, severe vs. mild cases. |
| Sinaci, 8/11/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of severe case, 90.0% lower, RR 0.10, p = 0.35, treatment 0 of 36 (0.0%), control 7 of 123 (5.7%), NNT 18, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), supplementation. |
| risk of moderate/severe case, 18.8% higher, RR 1.19, p = 0.64, treatment 8 of 36 (22.2%), control 23 of 123 (18.7%), supplementation. | |
| Subramanian, 1/31/2022, prospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 27.3% lower, RR 0.73, p = 0.12, treatment 31 of 131 (23.7%), control 80 of 336 (23.8%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, prescribed supplement use, multivariable. |
| Sulli, 2/24/2021, retrospective, Italy, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 75.6% lower, OR 0.24, p < 0.001, treatment 22 of 65 (33.8%) cases, 44 of 65 (67.7%) controls, NNT 3.0, case control OR, vitamin D supplementation. |
| Tylicki, 1/6/2022, retrospective, Poland, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, study period 6 October, 2020 - 28 February, 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 14.4% lower, RR 0.86, p = 0.61, treatment 28 of 85 (32.9%), control 25 of 48 (52.1%), NNT 5.2, adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk, multivariable. |
| Ullah, 3/4/2021, retrospective, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 3 authors, dosage not specified, excluded in exclusion analyses: significant unadjusted confounding possible. | risk of death, 42.1% higher, RR 1.42, p = 0.34, treatment 21 of 64 (32.8%), control 26 of 135 (19.3%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. |
| risk of case, 146.0% higher, RR 2.46, p < 0.001, treatment 69 of 2,168 (3.2%), control 139 of 12,681 (1.1%), adjusted per study, odds ratio converted to relative risk. | |
| van Helmond, 9/17/2022, prospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 14 authors, study period 27 October, 2020 - 31 January, 2021, dosage 5,000IU daily, trial NCT04596657 (history). | risk of case, 97.5% lower, RR 0.02, p = 0.07, treatment 0 of 255 (0.0%), control 36 of 2,827 (1.3%), NNT 79, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm). |
| Vasheghani, 1/18/2021, retrospective, Iran, preprint, 6 authors, dosage not specified. | risk of death, 30.4% lower, RR 0.70, p = 0.45, treatment 7 of 88 (8.0%), control 48 of 420 (11.4%), NNT 29, vitamin D supplementation. |
| risk of ICU admission, 63.8% lower, RR 0.36, p = 0.009, treatment 13 of 185 (7.0%), control 53 of 323 (16.4%), NNT 11, adjusted per study, inverted to make RR<1 favor treatment, vitamin D levels >30ng/mL. | |
| Villasis-Keever, 4/18/2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Mexico, peer-reviewed, 16 authors, study period 15 July, 2020 - 30 December, 2020, dosage 4,000IU daily. | risk of hospitalization, 66.5% lower, RR 0.33, p = 1.00, treatment 0 of 150 (0.0%), control 1 of 152 (0.7%), NNT 152, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), ITT. |
| risk of case, 78.0% lower, RR 0.22, p = 0.001, treatment 7 of 150 (4.7%), control 26 of 152 (17.1%), NNT 8.0, adjusted per study, multivariable, Table 3. | |
| Wang (C), 3/29/2023, Randomized Controlled Trial, China, peer-reviewed, median age 36.5, 23 authors, study period 18 December, 2022 - 20 February, 2023, dosage 200,000IU days 1, 14, trial NCT05673980 (history). | risk of progression, 25.2% lower, RR 0.75, p = 0.15, treatment 99, control 103, combined symptoms. |
| risk of progression, 4.0% higher, RR 1.04, p = 1.00, treatment 5 of 99 (5.1%), control 5 of 103 (4.9%), risk of severe case, fever. | |
| risk of progression, 7.5% lower, RR 0.92, p = 1.00, treatment 8 of 99 (8.1%), control 9 of 103 (8.7%), NNT 152, risk of severe case, sore throat. | |
| risk of progression, 42.2% lower, RR 0.58, p = 0.41, treatment 5 of 99 (5.1%), control 9 of 103 (8.7%), NNT 27, risk of severe case, rhinorrhea or congestion. | |
| risk of progression, 66.2% lower, RR 0.34, p = 1.00, treatment 0 of 99 (0.0%), control 1 of 103 (1.0%), NNT 103, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), risk of severe case, diarrhea. | |
| risk of progression, 66.2% lower, RR 0.34, p = 1.00, treatment 0 of 99 (0.0%), control 1 of 103 (1.0%), NNT 103, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), risk of severe case, vomiting. | |
| risk of progression, 13.3% lower, RR 0.87, p = 0.82, treatment 10 of 99 (10.1%), control 12 of 103 (11.7%), NNT 65, risk of severe case, cough. | |
| risk of progression, 48.0% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.13, treatment 8 of 99 (8.1%), control 16 of 103 (15.5%), NNT 13, risk of severe case, muscle/joint aches. | |
| risk of progression, 56.1% higher, RR 1.56, p = 0.68, treatment 3 of 99 (3.0%), control 2 of 103 (1.9%), risk of severe case, taste/smell. | |
| risk of case, 3.7% lower, RR 0.96, p = 0.89, treatment 50 of 99 (50.5%), control 54 of 103 (52.4%), NNT 52. | |
| risk of case, 15.0% higher, RR 1.15, p = 0.47, treatment 42 of 99 (42.4%), control 38 of 103 (36.9%), first two weeks. | |
| risk of case, 48.0% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.13, treatment 8 of 99 (8.1%), control 16 of 103 (15.5%), NNT 13, last two weeks. | |
| Ünsal (B), 4/5/2021, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 10 authors, dosage varies. | risk of pneumonia, 71.4% lower, RR 0.29, p = 0.009, treatment 4 of 28 (14.3%), control 14 of 28 (50.0%), NNT 2.8, average 800-1000IU/day cholecalciferol. |
| Şengül, 12/31/2022, retrospective, Turkey, peer-reviewed, 4 authors, study period March 2020 - December 2021, dosage not specified. | risk of case, 68.5% lower, OR 0.31, p = 0.004, treatment 8 of 54 (14.8%) cases, 94 of 264 (35.6%) controls, NNT 7.4, case control OR. |

