Analgesics⏵
Antiandrogens⏵
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle⏵
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals⏵
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals⏵
Naso/orophar..⏵
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins⏵
More⏵

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
All vitamin D studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
←
next
study
→
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchVitamin DVitamin D (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Home Adoption Other Treatments
@CovidAnalysis
All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Severe case 55% Improvement Relative Risk Vitamin D for COVID-19  Macaya et al.  Sufficiency Are vitamin D levels associated with COVID-19 outcomes? Retrospective 80 patients in Spain Lower severe cases with higher vitamin D levels (not stat. sig., p=0.07) c19early.org Macaya et al., Nutr. Hosp., October 2020 Favors vitamin D Favors control

Interaction between age and vitamin D deficiency in severe COVID-19 infection

Macaya et al., Nutr. Hosp., doi:10.20960/nh.03193
Oct 2020  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
Vitamin D for COVID-19
8th treatment shown to reduce risk in October 2020
 
*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 120 studies, recognized in 8 countries.
Lower risk for mortality, ICU admission, hospitalization, progression, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
4,000+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19early.org
Retrospective 80 hospitalized patients in Spain showing higher risk of severe COVID-19 with vitamin D deficiency.
This is the 21st of 196 COVID-19 sufficiency studies for vitamin D, which collectively show higher levels reduce risk with p<0.0000000001 (1 in 11,637 vigintillion).
Important missing comments or errors? Let us know.
risk of severe case, 55.0% lower, RR 0.45, p = 0.07, high D levels 11 of 35 (31.4%), low D levels 20 of 45 (44.4%), NNT 7.7, inverted to make RR<1 favor high D levels, odds ratio converted to relative risk, >20ng/mL.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Macaya et al., 21 Oct 2020, retrospective, Spain, peer-reviewed, 8 authors.
This PaperVitamin DAll
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit    
Post
Share
@CovidAnalysis
FAQ
Public domain CC0 1.0