c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchSelect treatment..Select..
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Thermotherapy Meta
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta

COVID-19 treatment: high-profit systemic drugs

• High-profit treatments are effective, but have access and cost barriers

We do not provide medical advice. No treatment is 100% effective, and all may have side effects. Protocols combine multiple treatments. Consult a qualified physician for personalized risk/benefit analysis.
Over 10,000 compounds predicted to reduce risk—SARS-CoV-2 easily disabled SARS-CoV-2 infection involves a complex interplay of over 350 host and viral proteins and other factors1-93, providing many therapeutic targets. Scientists have identified 10,495+ compounds94 potentially beneficial for COVID-19. Hundreds of compounds inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, including many with known pharmacokinetics and proven safety.
Pfizer has received over US$10 billion in penalties for 90+ violations including false claims and drug safety violations95.
Pfizer vs. independent paxlovid RCTs
Pfizer RCTs85% [15‑98%]
Independent RCTs2% [-29‑25%]
Paxlovid Paxlovid was effective96-180, but has significant side effects, increased risk of replication-competent viral rebound126, and extensive contraindications181,182. Resistant variants are likely183-190 and current efficacy may be lower. The degree of efficacy is unclear—Pfizer RCTs report good results, while independent RCTs118,162 show poor results, consistent with meta-analysis showing that industry-sponsored studies are more likely to be favorable191. Pfizer denied access for other independent trials192. The largest RCT, the 3,371 patient PANORAMIC trial started in April 2022, did not release any results during the pandemic—results were unknown prior to leaking from an embargoed database entry in October 2025193. About one third of people may be at risk of a major/contraindicated drug interaction, which may increase for patients over 60 or with comorbidities that also increase COVID-19 risk182,194. Hoertel et al.195 found that over 50% of COVID-19 patients who died had a contraindication for paxlovid. Use may promote the emergence of variants that weaken host immunity and contribute to long COVID196. Observational studies are often highly confounded—in population studies patients that seek out and receive paxlovid may also be more health-conscious, be more likely to take additional measures or known beneficial non-prescription treatments, and have improved access to the medical system. Malden et al. confirm this, showing that treated patients are more likely to be from affluent neighborhoods, be more health-conscious, and have better access to care. Studies are also often confounded via immortal time bias and failure to exclude contraindicated patients in the control group.
3CLpro inhibitors Paxlovid inhibits SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, a key enzyme in the viral replication process. In addition to existing compounds that function as 3CLpro inhibitors such as quercetin and curcumin, many novel compounds have been developed. Paxlovid is unlikely to be the most effective, the safest178,195,198,199, or the most resistant to variants183-190, however it is the most profitable. Other novel 3CLpro inhibitors showing lower COVID-19 risk include atilotrelvir, ibuzatrelvir, and leritrelvir200-206.
Merck has received over US$10 billion in penalties for 80+ violations including false claims and drug safety violations207.
Molnupiravir Molnupiravir is likely effective138,145,151,152,173,174,208-253, with precise efficacy unclear due to similar issues regarding conflicts of interest in RCTs and confounding in population studies. However, potential mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and embryotoxicity240,254-267, the increased risk of creating new dangerous variants268-272, an association with increased viral persistence240, and the existence of many other options rule out use in humans. Molnupiravir has been used for creating variants to test the resistance of treatments to escape mutations273.
Systemic antivirals may be less applicable to low-risk infections As SARS-CoV-2 has evolved, the frequency of serious cases has reduced. Systemic antivirals may have a more limited effect if infection does not spread beyond the upper respiratory tract.
Protocols combine multiple treatments No single treatment is guaranteed to be effective and safe for a specific individual. Leading evidence-based protocols combine multiple treatments.
c19early.org
Combined treatments increase efficacy
Monotherapy33% [30‑36%]
Polytherapy68% [57‑77%]
Meta analysis of early treatment studies.
Complementary/synergistic actions, viral evolution, escape risk suggest polytherapy There are many complementary mechanisms of action, and studies show complementary and synergistic effects with polytherapy277-293. For example, Jitobaom et al.278 shows >10x reduction in IC50 with ivermectin and niclosamide, an RCT by Said et al.285 showed the combination of nigella sativa and vitamin D was more effective than either alone, and an RCT by Wannigama et al.294 showed improved results with fluvoxamine combined with additional treatments, compared to fluvoxamine alone.
SARS-CoV-2 can rapidly acquire mutations altering infectivity, disease severity, and drug resistance even without selective pressure183-188,295,296. Antigenic drift can undermine more variant-specific treatments like monoclonal antibodies and more specific antivirals. Treatment with targeted antivirals may select for escape mutations297. The efficacy of treatments varies depending on cell type298 due to differences in viral receptor expression, drug distribution and metabolism, and cell-specific mechanisms. Efficacy may also vary based on genetic variants299-309.
Variable efficacy across variants, cell types, tissues, and host genetics, along with the complementary and synergistic actions of different treatments, all point to greater efficacy with polytherapy. In many studies, the standard of care given to all patients includes other treatments—efficacy seen in these trials may rely in part on synergistic effects. Less variant specific treatments and polytherapy targeting multiple viral and host proteins may be more effective. Meta analysis of all early treatment trials shows 68% [57‑77%] lower risk for studies using combined treatments, compared to 33% [30‑36%] for single treatments.
 
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Thanks for your feedback! Please search before submitting papers and note that studies are listed under the date they were first available, which may be the date of an earlier preprint.
Submit