Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All paxlovid studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchPaxlovidPaxlovid (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   All Outcomes    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Mortality 96% Improvement Relative Risk Mortality (b) 95% Hospitalization 88% Hospitalization (b) 89% Progression -11% Recovery time 21% Viral load, day 10 12% Viral load, day 14 5% Paxlovid  EPIC-HR  EARLY TREATMENT  DB RCT Is early treatment with paxlovid beneficial for COVID-19? Double-blind RCT 2,085 patients in multiple countries (Jul - Dec 2021) Lower mortality (p=0.00047) and hospitalization (p<0.0001) c19early.org Hammond et al., New England J. Medicine, Feb 2022 Favors paxlovid Favors control

Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19

Hammond et al., New England Journal of Medicine, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118542, EPIC-HR, NCT04960202
Feb 2022  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   Protocol   Results   All   Meta
EPIC-HR RCT, 1,039 higher risk patients treated with paxlovid (PF-07321332 + ritonavir) and 1,046 control patients, showing significantly lower mortality and hospitalization with treatment.
risk of death, 96.0% lower, RR 0.04, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 1,039 (0.0%), control 12 of 1,046 (1.1%), NNT 87, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), within 5 days.
risk of death, 94.8% lower, RR 0.05, p = 0.002, treatment 0 of 697 (0.0%), control 9 of 682 (1.3%), NNT 76, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), within 3 days.
risk of hospitalization, 87.6% lower, RR 0.12, p < 0.001, treatment 8 of 1,039 (0.8%), control 65 of 1,046 (6.2%), NNT 18, within 5 days.
risk of hospitalization, 88.9% lower, RR 0.11, p < 0.001, treatment 5 of 697 (0.7%), control 44 of 682 (6.5%), NNT 17, within 3 days.
risk of progression, 10.8% higher, OR 1.11, p = 0.45, treatment 686, control 674, from registry results, day 28, RR approximated with OR.
recovery time, 21.1% lower, relative time 0.79, p < 0.001, treatment 686, control 674, inverted to make RR<1 favor treatment, from registry results.
viral load, 12.1% lower, relative load 0.88, p < 0.001, treatment mean 4.532 (±2.101) n=529, control mean 3.984 (±2.109) n=526, from registry results, day 10.
viral load, 5.1% lower, relative load 0.95, p = 0.048, treatment mean 5.098 (±2.129) n=529, control mean 4.84 (±2.111) n=526, from registry results, day 14.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Hammond et al., 16 Feb 2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, multiple countries, peer-reviewed, 12 authors, study period 16 July, 2021 - 9 December, 2021, average treatment delay 2.93 days, trial NCT04960202 (history) (EPIC-HR).
This PaperPaxlovidAll
Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19
Ph.D Jennifer Hammond, Heidi Leister-Tebbe, M.P.H Annie Gardner, M.S.P.T Paula Abreu, Ph.D Weihang Bao, Ph.D Wayne Wisemandle, Ph.D Marylynn Baniecki, B.Sc Victoria M Hendrick, Ph.D Bharat Damle, M.D Abraham Simón-Campos, M.D Rienk Pypstra, M.D James M Rusnak
New England Journal of Medicine, doi:10.1056/nejmoa2118542
BACKGROUND Nirmatrelvir is an orally administered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 main protease (M pro ) inhibitor with potent pan-human-coronavirus activity in vitro. METHODS We conducted a phase 2-3 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in which symptomatic, unvaccinated, nonhospitalized adults at high risk for progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 300 mg of nirmatrelvir plus 100 mg of ritonavir (a pharmacokinetic enhancer) or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days. Covid-19-related hospitalization or death from any cause through day 28, viral load, and safety were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 2246 patients underwent randomization; 1120 patients received nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (nirmatrelvir group) and 1126 received placebo (placebo group). In the planned interim analysis of patients treated within 3 days after symptom onset (modified intention-to treat population, comprising 774 of the 1361 patients in the full analysis population), the incidence of Covid-19-related hospitalization or death by day 28 was lower in the nirmatrelvir group than in the placebo group by 6.32 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −9.04 to −3.59; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 89.1%); the incidence was 0.77% (3 of 389 patients) in the nirmatrelvir group, with 0 deaths, as compared with 7.01% (27 of 385 patients) in the placebo group, with 7 deaths. Efficacy was maintained in the final analysis involving the 1379 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, with a difference of −5.81 percentage points (95% CI, −7.78 to −3.84; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 88.9%). All 13 deaths occurred in the placebo group. The viral load was lower with nirmaltrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo at day 5 of treatment, with an adjusted mean difference of −0.868 log 10 copies per milliliter when treatment was initiated within 3 days after the onset of symptoms. The incidence of adverse events that emerged during the treatment period was similar in the two groups (any adverse event, 22.6% with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir vs. 23.9% with placebo; serious adverse events, 1.6% vs. 6.6%; and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drugs or placebo, 2.1% vs. 4.2%). Dysgeusia (5.6% vs. 0.3%) and diarrhea (3.1% vs. 1.6%) occurred more frequently with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of symptomatic Covid-19 with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir resulted in a risk of progression to severe Covid-19 that was 89% lower than the risk with placebo, without evident safety concerns. (Supported by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04960202.
References
Anand, Ziebuhr, Wadhwani, Mesters, Hilgenfeld, Coronavirus main proteinase (3CL pro ) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs, Science
Docherty, Harrison, Green, Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with Covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study, BMJ
Dougan, Nirula, Azizad, Bamlanivimab plus etesevimab in mild or moderate Covid-19, N Engl J Med
Gottlieb, Vaca, Paredes, Early remdesivir to prevent progression to severe Covid-19 in outpatients, N Engl J Med
Gupta, Gonzalez-Rojas, Juarez, Early treatment for Covid-19 with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody sotrovimab, N Engl J Med
Harvey, Carabelli, Jackson, SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape, Nat Rev Microbiol
Hilgenfeld, From SARS to MERS: crystallographic studies on coronaviral proteases enable antiviral drug design, FEBS J
Kim, Garg, 'halloran, Risk factors for intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality among hospitalized adults identified through the US Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET), Clin Infect Dis
Lan, Demets, Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials, Biometrika
Mahase, Covid-19: what new variants are emerging and how are they being investigated?, BMJ
Merck, Merck and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics provide update on results from MOVe-OUT study of molnupiravir, an investigational oral antiviral medicine, in at risk adults with mild-to-moderate COV-ID-19
Merck, Merck and Ridgeback's investigational oral antiviral molnupiravir reduced the risk of hospitalization or death by approximately 50 percent compared to placebo for patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 in positive interim analysis of phase 3 study
Ncd-, RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19•2 million participants, Lancet
Ning, Liu, Li, Novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection in a renal transplant recipient: case report, Am J Transplant
O'brien, Fleming, A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials, Biometrics
Owen, Allerton, Anderson, An oral SARS-CoV-2 M pro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19, Science
Roth, Mensah, Johnson, Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study, J Am Coll Cardiol
Sevrioukova, Poulos, Structure and mechanism of the complex between cytochrome P4503A4 and ritonavir, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Shaughnessy, Re: emergency use authorization 091
Shaughnessy, Re: emergency use authorization 094
Shaughnessy, Re: emergency use authorization 100
Thakur, Dubey, Benitez, A systematic review and meta-analysis of geographic differences in comorbidities and associated severity and mortality among individuals with COVID-19, Sci Rep
Weinreich, Sivapalasingam, Norton, REGEN-COV antibody combination and outcomes in outpatients with Covid-19, N Engl J Med
Wu, Mcgoogan, Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, JAMA
Yang, Xie, Xue, Design of wide-spectrum inhibitors targeting coronavirus main proteases, PLoS Biol
Zheng, Peng, Xu, Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: a systematic literature review and metaanalysis, J Infect
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit