Optimus announces Interim Clinical Results from Phase III Clinical Trials of Molnupiravir conducted in India

Optimus, Press Release, Oct 2021
Hospitalization 75% improvement lower risk ← → higher risk 2-point ordinal scale.. -15% 2-point ordinal scal.. b -15% 2-point ordinal scale.. c 9% 2-point ordinal scal.. d 4% 1-point ordinal scale.. -28% 1-point ordinal scal.. b -32% 1-point ordinal scale.. c 88% 1-point ordinal scal.. d 46% Viral clearance, mid-r.. 41% Viral clearance, day 14 1% Viral clearance, day 10 86% Molnupiravir  Optimus et al.  EARLY TREATMENT RCT Is early treatment with molnupiravir beneficial for COVID-19? RCT 1,202 patients in India Worse recovery (p=0.027) and improved viral clearance (p<0.0001) c19early.org Optimus, Press Release, October 2021 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ RR
RCT 1,202 patients showing improved viral clearance, but no significant differences in clinical outcomes. Only interim results were reported by the manufacturer, the final results are from1. Some results are provided only as percentages without confirming if data was available for all patients - we assume all patients had data available.
Potential risks of molnupiravir include the creation of dangerous variants, and mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, and embryotoxicity2-16. Multiple analyses have identified variants potentially created by molnupiravir17-21. Studies show significantly increased risk of acute kidney injury22 and neurological symptoms22.
risk of hospitalization, 75.2% lower, RR 0.25, p = 0.22, treatment 1 of 603 (0.2%), control 4 of 599 (0.7%), NNT 199, day 14.
no 2-point ordinal scale improvement, 15.5% higher, RR 1.15, p = 0.03, treatment 286 of 603 (47.4%), control 246 of 599 (41.1%), day 28.
no 2-point ordinal scale improvement, 14.9% higher, RR 1.15, p = 0.02, treatment 303 of 603 (50.2%), control 262 of 599 (43.7%), day 14.
no 2-point ordinal scale improvement, 8.7% lower, RR 0.91, p = 0.09, treatment 308 of 603 (51.1%), control 335 of 599 (55.9%), NNT 21, day 10.
no 2-point ordinal scale improvement, 4.0% lower, RR 0.96, p = 0.27, treatment 431 of 603 (71.5%), control 446 of 599 (74.5%), NNT 34, day 5.
no 1-point ordinal scale improvement, 27.7% higher, RR 1.28, p = 0.80, treatment 9 of 603 (1.5%), control 7 of 599 (1.2%), day 28.
no 1-point ordinal scale improvement, 32.4% higher, RR 1.32, p = 0.66, treatment 12 of 603 (2.0%), control 9 of 599 (1.5%), day 14.
no 1-point ordinal scale improvement, 87.8% lower, RR 0.12, p < 0.001, treatment 13 of 603 (2.2%), control 106 of 599 (17.7%), NNT 6.4, day 10.
no 1-point ordinal scale improvement, 46.1% lower, RR 0.54, p < 0.001, treatment 127 of 603 (21.1%), control 234 of 599 (39.1%), NNT 5.6, day 5.
risk of no viral clearance, 40.6% lower, RR 0.59, p < 0.001, treatment 174 of 603 (28.9%), control 291 of 599 (48.6%), NNT 5.1, mid-recovery, day 5.
risk of no viral clearance, 0.7% lower, RR 0.99, p = 1.00, treatment 7 of 603 (1.2%), control 7 of 599 (1.2%), NNT 12900, day 14.
risk of no viral clearance, 86.0% lower, RR 0.14, p < 0.001, treatment 13 of 603 (2.2%), control 92 of 599 (15.4%), NNT 7.6, day 10.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Optimus et al., 28 Oct 2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, India, preprint, 1 author, licensee.
$0 $500 $1,000+ Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19 treatment protocols c19early.org January 2026 India United Kingdom Russia USA Sudan Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Pakistan Argentina Peru Philippines Vietnam Spain Brazil Italy France Japan China Uzbekistan Nepal Ethiopia Iran Ghana Mexico South Korea Germany Bangladesh Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland Uganda Venezuela Nigeria Egypt Bolivia Taiwan Zambia Fiji Bosnia-Herzegovina Ukraine Côte d'Ivoire Bulgaria Greece Slovakia Singapore Iceland New Zealand Mongolia Czechia Israel Trinidad and Tobago Hong Kong North Macedonia Belarus Qatar Panama Serbia CAR Chad Syria India favored low-cost treatments.The average efficacy of treatments was moderate.Low-cost treatments improve early treatment, andprovide complementary/synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
$0 $500 $1,000+ Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19treatment protocols worldwide c19early.org January 2026 India United Kingdom Russia USA Sudan Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Pakistan Argentina Peru Philippines Vietnam Spain Brazil Italy France Japan China Uzbekistan Nepal Ethiopia Iran Ghana Mexico South Korea Germany Bangladesh Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland Thailand Uganda Venezuela Nigeria Egypt Bolivia Taiwan Zambia Fiji Ukraine Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Bulgaria Greece Slovakia Singapore New Zealand Mongolia Czechia Israel Trinidad and Tobago Hong Kong North Macedonia Belarus Qatar Panama Benin Serbia CAR Syria India favored low-cost treatments.The average efficacy was moderate.Low-cost protocols improve early treatment,and add complementary/synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit