Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All favipiravir studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchFavipiravirFavipiravir (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Mortality -383% Improvement Relative Risk Ventilation -37% Time to improvement 0% no CI Dischage or NEWS <3 17% Time to viral- -125% Favipiravir  FAVID  LATE TREATMENT  DB RCT Is late treatment with favipiravir beneficial for COVID-19? Double-blind RCT 44 patients in Spain (November 2020 - October 2021) Higher mortality (p=0.49) and slower viral clearance (p=0.51), not sig. c19early.org Horcajada et al., Pneumonia, August 2023 Favors favipiravir Favors control

Safety and efficacy of favipiravir in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (FAVID)

Horcajada et al., Pneumonia, doi:10.1186/s41479-023-00124-6 (date from preprint), FAVID, EudraCT2020-002753-22
Aug 2023  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
Underpowered RCT with 44 hospitalized patients in Spain, showing no significant difference with favipiravir treatment in the primary outcome of time to clinical improvement, or in the secondary efficacy outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in the favipiravir group (68%) compared to placebo (32%), but most were mild.
risk of death, 382.6% higher, RR 4.83, p = 0.49, treatment 2 of 23 (8.7%), control 0 of 21 (0.0%), continuity correction due to zero event (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), day 28.
risk of mechanical ventilation, 37.0% higher, RR 1.37, p = 1.00, treatment 3 of 23 (13.0%), control 2 of 21 (9.5%), day 28.
time to improvement, no change, relative time 1.00, p = 0.45, treatment 23, control 21.
dischage or NEWS <3, 16.7% lower, relative time 0.83, p = 0.64, treatment 23, control 21.
time to viral-, 125.0% higher, relative time 2.25, p = 0.51, treatment 23, control 21.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Horcajada et al., 24 Aug 2023, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, Spain, peer-reviewed, 30 authors, study period November 2020 - October 2021, trial EudraCT2020-002753-22 (FAVID).
This PaperFavipiravirAll
Safety and efficacy of favipiravir in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (FAVID)
Juan P Horcajada, Rebeca Aldonza, Mónica Real, Silvia Castañeda-Espinosa, Elena Sendra, Joan Gomez-Junyent, Inmaculada López-Montesinos, Silvia Gómez-Zorrilla, Silvia Briansó, Montserrat Duran-Taberna, Andrés Fernández, Cristina Tarragó, Teresa Auguet-Quintillá, Maria Arenas-Miras, Itziar Arrieta‐aldea, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Roberto Güerri‐fernandez, Hernando Knobel, Maria Milagro Montero, Ivan Pelegrín, Francisca Sánchez‐martínez, Luisa Sorlí, Judith Villar‐garcía, Ajla Alibalic, Javier Camaron, Anna Maria Febrer, Laia Bertran, Andrea Barrientos
Pneumonia, doi:10.1186/s41479-023-00124-6
Purpose To design a randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 disease with pneumonia. Methods A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was conducted in three Spanish sites. Randomization 1:1 to favipiravir or placebo (in both groups added to the Standard of Care) was performed to treat the patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary endpoint was "time to clinical improvement, " measured as an improvement for ≥ two categories on a 7-point WHO ordinal scale in an up to 28 days' time frame. Results Forty-four patients were randomized (23 in the favipiravir group and 21 in the placebo group). The median time to clinical improvement was not different between the favipiravir and the placebo arms (10 days for both groups) and none of the secondary endpoints showed significant differences between arms. The proportion of adverse events (both serious and non-serious) was statistically different between the favipiravir group (68.29%) and the placebo group (31.7%) (p = 0.019), but there was insufficient statistical evidence to correlate the degree of severity of the events with the treatment group. Conclusions Favipiravir administered for ten days to patients with COVID-19 and pneumonia did not improve outcomes compared with placebo. Although this is an underpowered negative study, efficacy results align with other randomized trials. However, in the present study, the non-serious adverse events were more frequent in the favipiravir group.
Authors' contributions Conceptualisation: JPH, TAQ, AF, RA and CT. Data collection: MR, SCE, ES, JGJ, ILM, SGZ, SB and MDT. Data quality: RA. Formal analyses: RA. Project administration: AF, RA and CT. Evidence synthesis: JPH, TAQ, RA and CT. Writing-original draft: JPH, TAQ, RA and CT. Funding acquisition: AF, RA and CT. Writing-review and editing: JPH, TAQ, RA and CT. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The competing Ethics Committee of Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, approved the study protocol on 31 st of July 2020. Competing interests JPH has received consulting fees from Gilead, Menarini and TFF Pharmaceuticals, and participated in educational activities from MSD, Pfizer and Angelini. All other authors have no conflicts of interests. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Acanfora, Acanfora, Ciccone, Scicchitano, Bortone et al., The cross-talk between thrombosis and inflammatory storm in acute and long-COVID-19: therapeutic targets and clinical cases, Viruses, doi:10.3390/v13101904
Alqahtani, Kumar, Aljawder, Abdulrahman, Mohamed et al., Randomized controlled trial of favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine, and standard care in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 disease, Sci Rep, doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08794-w
Bai, Mu, Kargb, Song, Niu et al., Clinical and Virological Characteristics of Ebola Virus Disease Patients Treated With Favipiravir (T-705)-Sierra Leone, Clin Infect Dis
Beigel, Tomashek, Dodd, Mehta, Zingman et al., Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 -Final Report, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
Bosaeed, Alharbi, Alrehily, Bahlaq, Gaifer, Efficacy of favipiravir in adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled clinical trial, Clin Microbiol Infect, doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.12.026
Cai, Yang, Liu, Chen, Shu et al., Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study, Engineering, doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.007
Chuah, Chow, Hor, Cheng, Ker et al., Efficacy of Early Treatment With Favipiravir on Disease Progression Among High-Risk Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Randomized. Open-Label Clinical Trial, Clin Infect Dis, doi:10.1093/cid/ciab962
Furuta, Gowen, Takahashi, Shiraki, Smee et al., Favipiravir (T-705), a novel viral RNA polymerase inhibitor, Antiviral Res, doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.09.015
Gowen, Wong, Jung, Sanders, Mendenhall et al., In vitro and in vivo activities of T-705 against arenavirus and bunyavirus infections, Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Gök, Bahçecioğlu, Durmuş, Gün, Ersoy et al., The safety profile of favipiravir in COVID-19 patients with severe renal impairment, Int J Clin Pract, doi:10.1111/ijcp.14938
Hassanipour, Arab-Zozani, Amani, Heidarzad, Fathalipour et al., The efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, Sci Rep, doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90551-6
Horby, Lim, Emberson, Mafham, Bell et al., Dexametasona en pacientes hospitalizados con Covid-19, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Joshi, Parkar, Ansari, Vora, Talwar et al., Role of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19, Int J Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.069
Manabe, Kambayashi, Akatsu, Kudo, Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Infect Dis, doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06164-x
Marconi, Ramanan, De Bono, Kartman, Krishnan et al., Efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalised adults with COVID-19 (COV-BARRIER): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, Lancet Respir Med, doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00331-3
Mcelvaney, Nalbandian, Sehgal, Gupta, Madhavan et al., Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, Nat Med, doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
Mcmahon, Lau, Coldham, Roney, Hagenauer et al., Favipiravir in early symptomatic COVID-19, a randomised placebocontrolled trial, EClinicalMedicine, doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101703
Meyerowitz, Richterman, Gandhi, Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a review of viral host, and environmental factors, Ann Intern Med
Nalbandian, Sehgal, Gupta, Madhavan, Mcgroder et al., Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, Nat Med, doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
Oestereich, Lüdtke, Wur, Rieger, Rieger et al., Successful treatment of advanced Ebola virus infection with T-705 (favipiravir) in a small animal model, Antiviral Res
Ozsurekci, Oygar, Gürlevik, Kesici, Ozen et al., Favipiravir use in children with COVID-19 and acute kidney injury: is it safe?, Pediatr Nephrol, doi:10.1007/s00467-021-05111-x
Peiffer-Smadja, Rebeaud, Guihur, Mahamat-Saleh, Fiolet, Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19: a tale of populism and obscurantism, Lancet Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30866-5
Schumaker, Bhimraj, Pharmacologic treatment and management of Coronavirus Disease 2019, Infect Dis Clin North Am, doi:10.1016/j.idc.2022.02.001
Shah, Orton, Grinsztejn, Donaldson, Ramírez et al., Favipiravir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 (PIO-NEER trial): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial of early intervention versus standard care, Lancet Respir Med, doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00412-X
Shankar-Hari, Vale, Godolphin, Fisher, Higgins et al., WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group, Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis, JAMA, doi:10.1001/jama.2021.11330
Shinkai, Tsushima, Tanaka, Hagiwara, Tarumoto et al., Efficacy and safety of favipiravir in moderate COVID-19 pneumonia patients without oxygen therapy: a randomized, phase III clinical trial, Infect Dis Ther, doi:10.1007/s40121-021-00517-4
Sirijatuphat, Manosuthi, Niyomnaitham, Owen, Copeland et al., Early treatment of Favipiravir in COVID-19 patients without pneumonia: a multicentre, open-labelled, randomized control study, Emerg Microbes Infect, doi:10.1080/22221751.2022.2117092
Sussman, Golberstein, Polosa, Aerial Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus through Environmental E-Cigarette Aerosols: Implications for Public Policies, Int J Environ Res Public Health, doi:10.3390/ijerph18041437
Udwadia, Singh, Barkate, Patil, Rangwala et al., Efficacy and safety of favipiravir, an oral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, in mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a randomized, comparative, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial, Int J Infect Dis
Ueda, Tanimoto, Murayama, Ozaki, Kami, Japan's drug regulation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: lessons from a case study of Favipiravir, Clin Pharmacol Ther, doi:10.1002/cpt.2251
Wang, Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro, Cell Res
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit