Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
 
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchAntihistamine H1RAsH1RAs (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Antihistamines Meta
Azvudine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Bromhexine Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis       

Azelastine Nasal Spray in Non-Hospitalised Subjects with Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentric, Phase II Clinical Trial

Meiser et al., MDPI AG, doi:10.20944/preprints202410.2532.v1, CARVIN-II, CTRI/2022/09
Oct 2024  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Recovery, day 3 13% Improvement Relative Risk Viral load, day 3 6% Viral load, day 6 2% Viral load, day 11 1% Viral clearance, AUC 3% Azelastine  CARVIN-II  LATE TREATMENT  DB RCT Is late treatment with azelastine beneficial for COVID-19? Double-blind RCT 251 patients in India (September 2022 - May 2023) Improved viral clearance with azelastine (p<0.000001) c19early.org Meiser et al., MDPI AG, October 2024 Favorsazelastine Favorscontrol 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+
10th treatment shown to reduce risk in December 2020, now with p = 0.000063 from 16 studies.
Lower risk for mortality, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine treatments.
5,100+ studies for 112 treatments. c19early.org
RCT 294 low-risk subjects with mild COVID-19 showing significantly greater reduction in viral load with azelastine 0.1% nasal spray vs. placebo. There was no COVID-19 related hospitalization in either group. The reduction in viral load was significantly higher in the azelastine group at day 3, 6 and 11.
Authors report that treatment was associated with significant improvement in fever (p=0.0046), weakness (p=0.0012) and hypoxia (p<0.0001) compared to placebo, however detailed results are not provided for these and other symptoms.
Treatment delay from symptom onset is not specified, however the baseline viral load, lack of progression, and recovery profile are consistent with relatively late treatment among low-risk patients.
Time to recovery results are not clear, with an inconsistent HR and 95% CI reported 0.32 [0.83-2.32].
Viral load measured by PCR may not accurately reflect infectious virus measured by viral culture. Porter et al. show that viral load early in infection was correlated with infectious virus, but viral load late in infection could be high even with low or undetectable infectious virus. Assessing viral load later in infection may underestimate reductions in infectious virus with treatment.
risk of no recovery, 12.5% lower, RR 0.87, p = 0.42, treatment mean 0.8 (±0.99) n=122, control mean 0.7 (±0.96) n=129, WHO scale improvement, mid-recovery, day 3.
viral load, 6.4% lower, relative load 0.94, p < 0.001, treatment mean 2.8 (±0.27) n=122, control mean 2.62 (±0.26) n=129, relative viral load reduction, mid-recovery, day 3.
viral load, 2.2% lower, relative load 0.98, p = 0.001, treatment mean 5.05 (±0.29) n=122, control mean 4.94 (±0.25) n=129, relative viral load reduction, mid-recovery, day 6.
viral load, 1.3% lower, relative load 0.99, p = 0.003, treatment mean 5.93 (±0.22) n=122, control mean 5.85 (±0.2) n=129, relative viral load reduction, mid-recovery, day 11.
risk of no viral clearance, 3.2% lower, RR 0.97, p < 0.001, treatment mean 1014.96 (±35.25) n=122, control mean 982.98 (±31.68) n=129, relative AUC.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Meiser et al., 31 Oct 2024, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, India, preprint, 7 authors, study period 27 September, 2022 - 16 May, 2023, trial CTRI/2022/09 (CARVIN-II). Contact: p.meiser@ursapharm.de (corresponding author).
This PaperH1RAsAll
Azelastine Nasal Spray in Non-Hospitalised Subjects with Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentric, Phase II Clinical Trial
Peter Meiser, Michael Flegel, Frank Holzer, Dorothea Groß, Charlotte Steinmetz, Barbara Scherer, Rajesh Jain
doi:10.20944/preprints202410.2532.v1
Availability of nasal spray treatments that inhibit the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry into nose and nasopharynx at early stages can be an appropriate approach to stop or delay the progression of the disease. We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentric, phase II clinical trial comparing the rate of hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection between azelastine 0.1% nasal spray and placebo nasal spray treatment groups. The study furthermore assessed the reduction in virus load in SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects estimated via quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using nasopharyngeal swabs in both the groups during the treatment period. A total of 294 subjects with mild COVID-19 infection were screened and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. There was no incidence of COVID-19 related hospitalization in both treatment groups. Mean virus load was significantly reduced in both groups during the 11 treatment days as compared with baseline viral load values. The reduction in virus load in the azelastine 0.1% nasal spray group was significantly higher than the reduction in the placebo group at day 11 (log10 5.93 vs. log10 5.85 copies/mL, respectively, p=0.0041). A total of 39 (32.0%) subjects in the azelastine 0.1% treatment group and 40 (31.0%) subjects in the placebo group reported 48 and 51 adverse events, respectively. It is therefore concluded that azelastine 0.1% nasal spray is an efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated treatment of mild COVID-19 infection.
well as the formation of a physical barrier (HPMC is one ingredient of the formulation) might have contributed to such effects. Conclusions Overall, no incidence of COVID-19 related hospitalization, accompanied by significant reduction in viral load and improvements in symptom severity in this study support the use of azelastine 0.1% nasal spray in subjects tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with mild symptoms. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1: Table S1 Funding: This research received no external funding. The Clinical Trial was funded by URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH. Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was approved by all involved Institutional Review Boards and Ethics Committees. A full list of the Institutional Review Boards and Ethics Committees involved is provided in the Supplementary Table S1 . The study was conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable local and national regulatory requirements. Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Conflicts of Interest: Peter Meiser, Michael Flegel, Dorothea Groß, Charlotte Steinmetz and Barbara Scherer are employed at URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, Frank Holzer is the CEO of URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, the sponsor of the clinical trial. Rajesh Jain is employed at PharmaLex India Pvt. Ltd, the CRO which organized this trial.
References
Balasubramani, Ravichandran, Kumar Arun Prasad, Ramkumar, Shekhar et al., Spatio-Temporal Epidemiology and Associated Indicators of Covid-19 (Wave-I and Ii) in India, Sci Rep
Bernal, Jayk, Gomes Da Silva, Musungaie, Kovalchuk et al., Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients, New England Journal of Medicine
Cascella, Rajnik, Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (Covid-19)
Dings, Meiser, Holzer, Flegel, Selzer et al., Pharmacometric Modeling of the Impact of Azelastine Nasal Spray on Sars-Cov-2 Viral Load and Related Symptoms in Covid-19 Patients, Pharmaceutics
Dte, Ghs, Clinical Guidance for the Syndromic Management of Suspected Covid-19 Cases
Fischhuber, Bánki, Kimpel, Kragl, Rössler et al., Antiviral Potential of Azelastine against Major Respiratory Viruses, Viruses
Ghahremanpour, Tirado-Rives, Deshmukh, Ippolito, Zhang et al., Identification of 14 Known Drugs as Inhibitors of the Main Protease of Sars-Cov-2, ACS Med Chem Lett
Jain, Mujwar, Repurposing Metocurine as Main Protease Inhibitor to Develop Novel Antiviral Therapy for Covid-19, Struct Chem
Killingley, Ben, Mann, Kalinova, Boyers et al., Safety, Tolerability and Viral Kinetics During Sars-Cov-2 Human Challenge in Young Adults, Nature Medicine
Klussmann, Peter, Grosheva, Meiser, Lehmann et al., Early Intervention with Azelastine Nasal Spray May Reduce Viral Load in Sars-Cov-2 Infected Patients, Sci Rep
Konrat, Papp, Kimpel, Rössler, Szijártó et al., The Anti-Histamine Azelastine, Identified by Computational Drug Repurposing, Inhibits Infection by Major Variants of Sars-Cov-2 in Cell Cultures and Reconstituted Human Nasal Tissue, Front Pharmacol
Marc, Kerioui, Blanquart, Bertrand, Mitjà et al., Quantifying the Relationship between Sars-Cov-2 Viral Load and Infectiousness, eLife
Odhar, Ahjel, Albeer, Hashim, Rayshan et al., Molecular Docking and Dynamics Simulation of Fda Approved Drugs with the Main Protease from 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Bioinformation
Panahi, Mahdavi Gorabi, Talaei, Beiraghdar, Akbarzadeh et al., An Overview on the Treatments and Prevention against Covid-19, Virology Journal
Parasher, Covid-19: Current Understanding of Its Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation and Treatment, Postgraduate Medical Journal
Reznikov, Norris, Vashisht, Bluhm, Li et al., Identification of Antiviral Antihistamines for Covid-19 Repurposing, Biochem Biophys Res Commun
Shmuel, Dalia, Tair, Yaakov, Low Ph Hypromellose (Taffix) Nasal Powder Spray Could Reduce Sars-Cov-2 Infection Rate Post Mass-Gathering Event at a Highly Endemic Community: An Observational Prospective Open Label User Survey, Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy
Sinha, Suram, Chary, Naik, Singh et al., Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir in Mild Covid-19 Patients in India, Cureus
Tandon, Wu, Moore, Winchester, Tu et al., Sars-Cov-2 Accelerated Clearance Using a Novel Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray (Nons) Treatment: A Randomized Trial, The Lancet Regional Health -Southeast Asia
Winchester, John, Jabbar, John, Clinical Efficacy of Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray (Nons) for the Treatment of Mild Covid-19 Infection, Journal of Infection
Yang, Pei, Li, Ma, Zhou et al., Identification of Sars-Cov-2 Entry Inhibitors among Already Approved Drugs, Acta Pharmacol Sin
{ 'indexed': { 'date-parts': [[2024, 11, 1]], 'date-time': '2024-11-01T04:20:44Z', 'timestamp': 1730434844064, 'version': '3.28.0'}, 'posted': {'date-parts': [[2024, 10, 31]]}, 'group-title': 'Medicine and Pharmacology', 'reference-count': 0, 'publisher': 'MDPI AG', 'license': [ { 'start': { 'date-parts': [[2024, 10, 31]], 'date-time': '2024-10-31T00:00:00Z', 'timestamp': 1730332800000}, 'content-version': 'unspecified', 'delay-in-days': 0, 'URL': 'http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0'}], 'content-domain': {'domain': [], 'crossmark-restriction': False}, 'accepted': {'date-parts': [[2024, 10, 30]]}, 'abstract': '<jats:p>Availability of nasal spray treatments that inhibit the Severe Acute Respiratory ' 'Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) entry into nose and nasopharynx at early stages can be an ' 'appropriate approach to stop or delay the progression of the disease. We performed a ' 'prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentric, ' 'phase II clinical trial comparing the rate of hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection ' 'between azelastine 0.1% nasal spray and placebo nasal spray treatment groups. The study ' 'furthermore assessed the reduction in virus load in SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects estimated ' 'via quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using ' 'nasopharyngeal swabs in both the groups during the treatment period. A total of 294 subjects ' 'with mild COVID-19 infection were screened and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.</jats:p>', 'DOI': '10.20944/preprints202410.2532.v1', 'type': 'posted-content', 'created': {'date-parts': [[2024, 11, 1]], 'date-time': '2024-11-01T01:15:18Z', 'timestamp': 1730423718000}, 'source': 'Crossref', 'is-referenced-by-count': 0, 'title': 'Azelastine Nasal Spray in Non-Hospitalised Subjects with Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Randomized ' 'Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentric, Phase II Clinical Trial', 'prefix': '10.20944', 'author': [ {'given': 'Peter', 'family': 'Meiser', 'sequence': 'first', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Michael', 'family': 'Flegel', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Frank', 'family': 'Holzer', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Dorothea', 'family': 'Groß', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Charlotte', 'family': 'Steinmetz', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Barbara', 'family': 'Scherer', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Rajesh', 'family': 'Jain', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}], 'member': '1968', 'container-title': [], 'original-title': [], 'deposited': { 'date-parts': [[2024, 11, 1]], 'date-time': '2024-11-01T01:16:34Z', 'timestamp': 1730423794000}, 'score': 1, 'resource': {'primary': {'URL': 'https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202410.2532/v1'}}, 'subtitle': [], 'short-title': [], 'issued': {'date-parts': [[2024, 10, 31]]}, 'references-count': 0, 'URL': 'http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2532.v1', 'relation': {}, 'subject': [], 'published': {'date-parts': [[2024, 10, 31]]}, 'subtype': 'preprint'}
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit