Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Monoclonals
Mpro inhibitors
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Quercetin
RdRp inhibitors
TMPRSS2 inh.
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
 
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchDexamethasoneDexamethas.. (more..)
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Thermotherapy Meta
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta

 

Low Rates of Hospitalization and Death in 4376 COVID-19 Patients Treated With Early Ambulatory Medical and Supportive Care: A Case Series and Observational Study

Tyson et al., Journal of Independent Medicine, doi:10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N02A06, Jan 2022 (preprint)
https://c19early.org/tysondex.html
Mortality 100% Improvement Relative Risk Hospitalization 100% Mortality b 98% Hospitalization b 99% Dexamethasone  Tyson et al.  EARLY TREATMENT Is early treatment with dexamethasone + multiple treatments beneficial for COVID-19? Retrospective 25,295 patients in the USA Lower mortality (p<0.0001) and hospitalization (p<0.0001) c19early.org Tyson et al., J. Independent Medicine, Jan 2022 Favorsdexamethasone Favorscontrol 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+
Retrospective 4,376 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 in the USA treated with multiple medications including HCQ/ivermectin, zinc, azithromycin, budesonide, and dexamethasone (exact treatments specific to each patient), showing significantly lower hospitalization and mortality compared to the surrounding community.
Standard of Care (SOC) for COVID-19 in the study country, the USA, is very poor with very low average efficacy for approved treatments1. Only expensive, high-profit treatments were approved for early treatment. Low-cost treatments were excluded, reducing the probability of early treatment due to access and cost barriers, and eliminating complementary and synergistic benefits seen with many low-cost treatments.
Study covers ivermectin, HCQ, vitamin B9, vitamin B12, zinc, budesonide, and dexamethasone.
risk of death, 99.9% lower, RR 0.001, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 3,962 (0.0%), control 636 of 20,921 (3.0%), NNT 33, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), All AVUC mild patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).
risk of hospitalization, 99.8% lower, RR 0.002, p < 0.001, treatment 2 of 3,962 (0.1%), control 4,770 of 20,921 (22.8%), NNT 4.4, All AVUC mild patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).
risk of death, 97.7% lower, RR 0.02, p < 0.001, treatment 3 of 4,374 (0.1%), control 636 of 20,921 (3.0%), NNT 34, All AVUC patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).
risk of hospitalization, 99.1% lower, RR 0.009, p < 0.001, treatment 9 of 4,374 (0.2%), control 4,770 of 20,921 (22.8%), NNT 4.4, All AVUC patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Tyson et al., 13 Jan 2022, retrospective, USA, peer-reviewed, 13 authors, this trial uses multiple treatments in the treatment arm (combined with multiple treatments) - results of individual treatments may vary. Contact: btysonmd@gmail.com.
Low Rates of Hospitalization and Death in 4376 COVID-19 Patients Treated With Early Ambulatory Medical and Supportive Care: A Case Series and Observational Study
Dr Brian Marshall Tyson, George Fareed, Emmanuel Gutierrez, Robert Villegas, Edgar Gomez, Paloma Lopez, Ernesto Breton Herrera, Miriam Castro, Jesus Palomera Iii, Christiany Alexandrah Morales, Ana Gonzalez, Fabiola Tyson, Mathew Crawford
Journal of Independent Medicine, doi:10.71189/jim/2025/v01n02a06
This study evaluates early ambulatory protocols for treating 4376 COVID-19 patients at All Valley Urgent Care (AVUC) facilities in Imperial County, California, and compares outcomes with other patients in the same region during a nearly identical period. The goal was to contribute to evidence on whether early outpatient treatment reduces hospitalization and mortality rates. The protocols, based on data from neighboring countries, included Protocol 1 (a multivitamin pack, selective use of hydroxychloroquine, two antibiotics, and inhaled steroids) and Protocol 2 (which added ivermectin). Results were stratified by disease severity at presentation. The average patient age was 40.5 years; 12.8% of patients were under 20 years old. For the 3962 . mild COVID-19 patients treated early, no deaths occurred, compared to a 3.03% mortality rate (2.25% risk-adjusted) in the same county during the same period. Hospitalization rates for this group were 0.05%, compared to 22.68% (20.76% risk-adjusted) in the general population. When treated within 7 days, patients had a 100% success rate, while those treated later had a 99.9% success rate. Mild symptom patients had lower hospitalization (OR = 0.0293; P < .0001) and mortality (OR = 0.0000; P = .0008) rates. These results suggest the multidrug protocols significantly reduced adverse outcomes, with no serious side effects observed during followup (3-14 days).
Competing Interests None of the authors report any conflicts of interest. Authors' Contribution: All authors had access to the data and wrote the manuscript. This page is intentionally left blank https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N02A06
References
Berardi, The Italian doctor flattening the curve by treating COVID-19 patients in their homes, TIME
Bhattacharya, Chowdhury, Nandi, Pre-exposure hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a retrospective cohort, Int J Res Med Sci, doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20205444
Chatterjee, Anand, Singh, Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: a case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19, Indian J Med Res, doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2234_20
Colbert, Venegas-Vera, Lerma, Utility of telemedicine in the COVID-19 era, Rev Cardiovasc Med, doi:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.188
Colson, Rolain, Lagier, Brouqui, Raoult, Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19, Int J An, doi:10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N02A06
Concato, Shah, Horwitz, Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJM200006223422507
Consortium, Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19-Interim WHO Solidarity trial results, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2023184
Derwand, Scholz, Zelenko, COVID-19 outpatients: early risk-stratified treatment with zinc plus low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective case series study, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106214
Flannery, Adkins, Cook, Unpeeling the evidence for the banana bag: evidencebased recommendations for the management of alcohol-associated vitamin and electrolyte deficiencies in the ICU, Crit Care Med, doi:10.1097/CCM.000000000000165
Gao, Tian, Yang, Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies, Biosci Trends, doi:10.5582/bst.2020.01047
Gautret, Lagier, Parola, Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
Group, Effect of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with Covid-19, N Engl J Med, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2022926
Guérin, Lévy, Thomas, Azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine accelerate recovery of outpatients with mild/moderate COVID-19, Asian J Med Health, doi:10.20944/preprints202005.0486.v1
Hcqmeta, HCQ for COVID-19: real-time meta-analysis of 273 studies
Ip, Ahn, Zhou, Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of outpatients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19: a multi-center observational study, BMC Infect Dis, doi:10.1186/s12879-021-05773-w
Keyaerts, Vijgen, Maes, Neyts, Van Ranst, In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.085
Kory, Meduri, Varon, Iglesias, Marik, Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19, Am J Ther, doi:10.1097/MJT.0000000000001377
Krauss, Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results, Ann Med, doi:10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N02A06
Mccullough, Eidt, Rangaswami, Urgent need for individual mobile phone and institutional reporting of at home, hospitalized, and intensive care unit cases of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, Rev Cardiovasc Med, doi:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.01.42
Mccullough, Innovative early sequenced multidrug therapy for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection to reduce hospitalization and death, Int J Med Sci Clin Invention, doi:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.264
Mccullough, Oskoui, Early multidrug regimens in new potentially fatal medical problems, Rev Cardiovasc Med, doi:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.270
Pang, Wang, Ang, Potential rapid diagnostics, vaccine and therapeutics for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): a systematic review, J Clin Med, doi:10.3390/jcm9030623
Procter, Ross, Pickard, Smith, Hanson et al., Clinical outcomes after early ambulatory multidrug therapy for highrisk SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, Rev Cardiovasc Med, doi:10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.260
Risch, Early outpatient treatment of symptomatic, high-risk COVID-19 patients that should be ramped up immediately as key to the pandemic crisis, Am J Epidemiol, doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa093
Rolain, Colson, Raoult, Recycling of chloroquine and its hydroxyl analogue to face bacterial, fungal and viral infections in the 21st century, Int J Antimicrob Agents, doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.05.015
Savarino, Boelaert, Cassone, Majori, Cauda, Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet, Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5
Vetter, Eckerle, Kaiser, COVID-19: a puzzle with many missing pieces, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.m627
Vincent, Bergeron, Benjannet, Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread, Virol J, doi:10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
DOI record: { "DOI": "10.71189/jim/2025/v01n02a06", "ISSN": [ "3066-2354" ], "URL": "http://dx.doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N02A06", "abstract": "<jats:p>This study evaluates early ambulatory protocols for treating 4376 COVID-19 patients at All Valley Urgent Care (AVUC) facilities in Imperial County, California, and compares outcomes with other patients in the same region during a nearly identical period. The goal was to contribute to evidence on whether early outpatient treatment reduces hospitalization and mortality rates. The protocols, based on data from neighboring countries, included Protocol 1 (a multivitamin pack, selective use of hydroxychloroquine, two antibiotics, and inhaled steroids) and Protocol 2 (which added ivermectin). Results were stratified by disease severity at presentation. The average patient age was 40.5 years; 12.8% of patients were under 20 years old. For the 3962 mild COVID-19 patients treated early, no deaths occurred, compared to a 3.03% mortality rate (2.25% risk-adjusted) in the same county during the same period. Hospitalization rates for this group were 0.05%, compared to 22.68% (20.76% risk-adjusted) in the general population. When treated within 7 days, patients had a 100% success rate, while those treated later had a 99.9% success rate. Mild symptom patients had lower hospitalization (OR = 0.0293; P &lt; .0001) and mortality (OR = 0.0000; P = .0008) rates. These results suggest the multidrug protocols significantly reduced adverse outcomes, with no serious side effects observed during follow-up (3–14 days).\n\nKeywords: COVID-19, hospitalization, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, mortality, multidrug, SARS-CoV-2</jats:p>", "author": [ { "affiliation": [], "family": "Tyson", "given": "Brian", "sequence": "first" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Fareed", "given": "George", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Gutierrez", "given": "Emmanuel", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Villegas", "given": "Robert", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Gomez", "given": "Edgar", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Lopez", "given": "Paloma", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Herrera", "given": "Ernesto", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Castro", "given": "Miriam", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Palomera III", "given": "Jesus", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Morales", "given": "Christiany", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Gonzalez", "given": "Ana", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Tyson", "given": "Fabiola", "sequence": "additional" }, { "affiliation": [], "family": "Crawford", "given": "Mathew", "sequence": "additional" } ], "container-title": "Journal of Independent Medicine", "container-title-short": "J Indep Med", "content-domain": { "crossmark-restriction": false, "domain": [] }, "created": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 4, 29 ] ], "date-time": "2025-04-29T18:07:23Z", "timestamp": 1745950043000 }, "deposited": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 4, 29 ] ], "date-time": "2025-04-29T18:07:28Z", "timestamp": 1745950048000 }, "indexed": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 4, 30 ] ], "date-time": "2025-04-30T04:21:05Z", "timestamp": 1745986865317, "version": "3.40.4" }, "is-referenced-by-count": 0, "issue": "02", "issued": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 5, 7 ] ] }, "journal-issue": { "issue": "02", "published-online": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 5, 7 ] ] } }, "member": "52103", "original-title": [], "page": "129-142", "prefix": "10.71189", "published": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 5, 7 ] ] }, "published-online": { "date-parts": [ [ 2025, 5, 7 ] ] }, "publisher": "Independent Medical Alliance", "reference-count": 0, "references-count": 0, "relation": {}, "resource": { "primary": { "URL": "https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n02a06/" } }, "score": 1, "short-title": [], "source": "Crossref", "subject": [], "subtitle": [], "title": "Low Rates of Hospitalization and Death in 4376 COVID-19 Patients Treated With Early Ambulatory Medical and Supportive Care: A Case Series and Observational Study", "type": "journal-article", "volume": "01" }
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit