Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
All vitamin D studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchVitamin DVitamin D (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Antihistamines Meta
Azvudine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Bromhexine Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   

Vitamin D for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 321 studies (122 treatment studies and 199 sufficiency studies)

Covid Analysis
Jul 2024  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Vitamin D for COVID-19
8th treatment shown to reduce risk in October 2020
 
*, now with p < 0.00000000001 from 122 studies, recognized in 9 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine treatments. * >10% efficacy, ≥3 studies.
4,500+ studies for 81 treatments. c19early.org
122 treatment studies show statistically significant lower risk for mortality, ICU admission, hospitalization, and cases.
62 studies from 58 independent teams in 22 countries show significantly lower risk.
Random effects meta-analysis with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported shows 60% [40‑74%] and 37% [31‑42%] lower risk for early treatment and for all studies. Results are similar for higher quality studies, peer-reviewed studies, and mortality: early treatment - 68% [45‑82%], 57% [36‑71%], 68% [39‑84%]; all - 37% [31‑42%], 41% [35‑46%], 36% [28‑43%].
Late stage treatment with calcitriol/calcifediol and analogs is more effective than cholecalciferol: 69% [47‑82%] vs. 39% [27‑49%].
Ongoing treatment with multiple doses is more effective than single bolus doses: 60% [49‑69%] vs. 21% [-13‑45%]
199 sufficiency studies show a strong association between vitamin D sufficiency and outcomes, with 52% [49‑56%] lower risk for higher levels.
No treatment or intervention is 100% effective. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. Multiple treatments are typically used in combination, and other treatments may be more effective. The quality of non-prescription supplements can vary widely1,2.
All data and sources to reproduce this paper are in the appendix. 17 other meta analyses show significant improvements with vitamin D treatment for mortality3-14, mechanical ventilation3,8,9,14-16, ICU admission3,5,8,9,12,14-18, hospitalization7,14, severity4,6,8,13,19, and cases10,18,19.
17 meta analyses show significant improvements with vitamin D treatment for mortality1-12, mechanical ventilation1,6,7,12-14, ICU admission1,3,6,7,10,12-16, hospitalization5,12, severity2,4,6,11,17, and cases8,16,17.
This PaperVitamin DAll
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit