Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All apremilast studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchApremilastApremilast (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Antihistamines Meta
Azvudine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Bromhexine Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   All Outcomes       

Industry Alliance Platform Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Candidate Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients

Amgen, NCT04590586, COMMUNITY, NCT04590586
Apr 2022  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Mortality -1% Improvement Relative Risk Improvement -8% Discharge -11% Recovery -11% Apremilast  COMMUNITY  LATE TREATMENT  DB RCT Is late treatment with apremilast beneficial for COVID-19? Double-blind RCT 515 patients in the USA No significant difference in outcomes seen c19early.org Amgen, NCT04590586, April 2022 Favorsapremilast Favorscontrol 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+
RCT 384 hospitalized patients showing no significant difference with apremilast treatment.
Study covers apremilast and lanadelumab.
risk of death, 0.9% higher, RR 1.01, p = 1.00, treatment 34 of 194 (17.5%), control 33 of 190 (17.4%).
risk of no improvement, 8.1% higher, RR 1.08, p = 0.73, treatment 53 of 194 (27.3%), control 48 of 190 (25.3%).
risk of no hospital discharge, 11.3% higher, RR 1.11, p = 0.56, treatment 50 of 194 (25.8%), control 44 of 190 (23.2%).
risk of no recovery, 10.6% higher, RR 1.11, p = 0.58, treatment 61 of 194 (31.4%), control 54 of 190 (28.4%).
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Amgen et al., 7 Apr 2022, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial, placebo-controlled, USA, preprint, 1 author, trial NCT04590586 (history) (COMMUNITY). Contact: medinfo@amgen.com.
This PaperApremilastAll
Abstract: Summary of clinical study results Title of the study: Industry Alliance Platform Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Candidate Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients Short title of the study: COVID-19 Multiple Agents and Modulators Unified Industry Members Trial (COMMUNITY) What was the study about?  o learn whether 3 investigational medications worked and how safe they were. The T investigational medications were studied in participants hospitalized with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes COVID-19. Who sponsored the study?  mgen Inc. supported by its industry partners Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc and A UCB Biopharma SRL What was tested?  here were 3 investigational medications tested: apremilast (marketed in some countries as T Otezla®), lanadelumab-IV, and zilucoplan (RA101495). Thank you to all participants We would like to thank everyone who took part in this study. Every participant in this study helped the researchers learn more about the treatment of COVID-19. The sponsor is committed to making research results available to the public. This summary has been provided as part of that commitment and should not be used for any other purpose. It should not be considered to make a claim for any product or to guide treatment decisions. Some information in this summary involving apremilast may be different from the prescribing information that doctors consider when they give patients this medicine that is approved for unrelated conditions. About this summary This summary was completed in April 2022. Where can I learn more about the study? You can find more information on the websites listed at the end of this summary. 1 At a glance Why was the research needed? Researchers were looking for a better way to treat people hospitalized with COVID-19. Researchers look at the results of many studies to understand if a medicine might work for a specific condition. It takes a lot of people in many studies all around the world to advance medical science. Who took part in the study? 8 515 Countries Adults aged 18 years or over who were hospitalized with COVID-19 were eligible to take part. A total of 515 people took part across 8 countries. What study medicine did participants receive? Apremilast Lanadelumab-IV Zilucoplan There were 3 investigational medications studied: apremilast, lanadelumab-IV, and zilucoplan. Participants were assigned to 1 of the 3 investigational medications or a placebo. A placebo looks like an investigational medication, but has no actual medicine in it. Placebo is used to better see the effects of the investigational medications being tested. Placebo Any of the 3 investigational medications or the placebo may be referred to as the “study medicine”. All participants also received the standard treatment (standard of care) for COVID-19 that was available locally. What were the main results of the study? The main question the researchers wanted to answer was: • Did any of the 3 investigational medications affect the time it took for people in the hospital to recover from COVID-19? Researchers also wanted to see if, after about a month from starting in the study, any of the 3 investigational medications affected the number of people who: • improved or were able to leave the hospital • had improved, been released from the hospital, and who no longer needed extra oxygen • died. Overall, researchers found that none of the..
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit