Ustekinumab for COVID-19
c19early.org
COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets.
c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research.
Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US.
In reality, many treatments reduce risk,
with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.
-
Naso/
oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection. -
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
-
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
-
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
-
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
-
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
-
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
-
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
-
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.
Ustekinumab may be beneficial for
COVID-19 according to the studies below.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets.
Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments.
c19early.org analyzes
210+ treatments.
We have not reviewed ustekinumab in detail.
, Cross-trait GWAS in COVID-19 and systemic sclerosis reveals novel genes implicated in fibrotic and inflammation pathways, Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf028
Abstract Objectives Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and SSc share multiple similarities in their clinical manifestations, alterations in immune response and therapeutic options. These resemblances have also been identified in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases where a common genetic component has been found. Thus, we decided to evaluate for the first time this shared genetic architecture with SSc. Methods For this study, we retrieved genomic data from two European-ancestry cohorts: 2 597 856 individuals from The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative consortium, and 26 679 individuals from the largest genomic scan in SSc. We performed a cross-trait meta-analyses including >9.3 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Finally, we conducted functional annotation to prioritize potential causal genes and performed drug repurposing analysis. Results Our results revealed a total of 19 non-HLA pleiotropic loci, including 2 novel associations for both conditions (BMP1 and PPARG) and 12 emerging as new shared loci. Functional annotation of these regions underscored their potential regulatory role and identified potential causal genes, many of which are implicated in fibrotic and inflammatory pathways. Remarkably, we observed an antagonistic pleiotropy model of the IFN signalling between COVID-19 and SSc, including the well-known TYK2 P1104A missense variant, showing a protective effect for SSc while being a risk factor for COVID-19, along with two additional novel pleiotropic associations (IRF8 and SENP7). Finally, our findings provide new therapeutic options that could potentially benefit both conditions. Conclusion Our study confirms the genetic resemblance between susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19 and SSc, revealing a novel common genetic contribution affecting fibrotic and immune pathways.