NV387-RDV-bP for COVID-19

c19early.org

COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence

COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets. c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research. Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US. In reality, many treatments reduce risk, with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.

Naso/oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection.
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.

NV387-RDV-bP may be beneficial for COVID-19 according to the study below. COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets. Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments. c19early.org analyzes 210+ treatments. We have not reviewed NV387-RDV-bP in detail.

Study suggesting benefit with NV387-RDV-bP

Chakraborty et al., Remdesivir-bisPropionate, a better derivative of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo PK/PD Study as well as its therapeutic potential, PLOS One, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324811

FDA approved remdesivir, which was though very effective against SARS-corona virus in cell culture system but in human its efficacy was below 10%, as reported. The main reasons are due to the poor stability of remdesivir in presence plasma. In order to increase the protective strength of remdesivir we took couple of approaches, one, to make an alternative but better derivative of remdesivir as remdesivir bis-propionate, and the other is to use our platform- designed biopolymer (NV387) to protect remdesivir compound from degradation in presence of plasma. Here we present our results as: (1) Remdesivir-bP is much more stable in vivo compared to remdesivir alone. (2) Remdesivir-bP when encapsulated within biopolymer, NV387, its stability is further enhanced. (3) The antiviral activity is also increased against NL-63 infection to rat model, compared to naked and/or encapsulated remdesivir. (4) The antiviral efficacy of the remdesivir pro-drug, therefore, can be mathematically drawn as follows: remdesivir-bP-encapsulated > remdesivir-encapsulated > remdesivir-bP > remdesivir.