Mahuangnin A for COVID-19

c19early.org

COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence

COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets. c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research. Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US. In reality, many treatments reduce risk, with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.

Naso/oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection.
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.

Mahuangnin A may be beneficial for COVID-19 according to the study below. COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets. Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments. c19early.org analyzes 210+ treatments. We have not reviewed Mahuangnin A in detail.

Study suggesting benefit with Mahuangnin A

Jabeen et al., Insights for Future Pharmacology: Exploring Phytochemicals as Potential Inhibitors Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Papain-like Protease, Future Pharmacology, doi:10.3390/futurepharmacol4030029

(1) Background: The SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) remains an underexplored antiviral target so far. The reduced efficacy of approved treatments against novel variants highlights the importance of developing new agents. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of phytochemicals as inhibitors of PLpro, identify gaps, and propose novel insights for future reference. (2) Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted using Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. Out of 150 articles reviewed, 57 met inclusion criteria, focusing on SARS-CoV-2 PLpro inhibitors, excluding studies on other coronaviruses or solely herbal extracts. Data were presented class-wise, and phytochemicals were grouped into virtual, weak, modest, and potential inhibitors. (3) Results: Approximately 100 phytochemicals are reported in the literature as PLpro inhibitors. We classified them as virtual inhibitors (70), weak inhibitors (13), modest inhibitors (11), and potential inhibitors (6). Flavonoids, terpenoids, and their glycosides predominated. Notably, six phytochemicals, including schaftoside, tanshinones, hypericin, and methyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate, emerged as potent PLpro inhibitors with favorable selectivity indices and disease-mitigation potential; (4) Conclusions: PLpro stands as a promising therapeutic target against SARS-CoV-2. The phytochemicals reported in the literature possess valuable drug potential; however, certain experimental and clinical gaps need to be filled to meet the therapeutic needs.