F226 for COVID-19
c19early.org
COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets.
c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research.
Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US.
In reality, many treatments reduce risk,
with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.
-
Naso/
oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection. -
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
-
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
-
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
-
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
-
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
-
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
-
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
-
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.
F226 may be beneficial for
COVID-19 according to the study below.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets.
Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments.
c19early.org analyzes
210+ treatments.
We have not reviewed F226 in detail.
, Susceptibility of broad reactivity nanobodies to resistance mutations in the S2 domain of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by yeast display deep mutational scanning, Frontiers in Immunology, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1726449
Introduction The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the erosion of vaccine induced serum neutralization and monoclonal antibody efficacy. As such, interest is inevitably moving towards more conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein like the S2 domain. Resistance mutations continue to be a major obstacle for the development of antivirals and vaccines which target the RBD but what extent these will be a problem for S2 binding antibodies is not known. Methods We have developed a yeast display deep scanning mutagenesis platform which allows an unbiased prospective assessment of millions of single and double mutations for their effects on antibody binding to the S2 domain. Results We have compared the mutational resistance of a panel of five nanobodies mapped to four distinct non-competing epitopes within the conserved fusion peptide, stem helix and heptad repeat 2 elements of the S2 domain. Yeast display deep mutational scanning predicted reduced binding of C303, G223, G225, and G142 to naturally occurring resistance mutations which were experimentally confirmed on SARS-CoV-2 variants. Discussion Our study shows that resistance mutations in conserved elements of the S2 domain may still pose a challenge to the development of monoclonal antibodies and subunit vaccines.