3AN for COVID-19
c19early.org
COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets.
c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research.
Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US.
In reality, many treatments reduce risk,
with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.
-
Naso/
oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection. -
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
-
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
-
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
-
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
-
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
-
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
-
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
-
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.
3AN may be beneficial for
COVID-19 according to the study below.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets.
Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments.
c19early.org analyzes
210+ treatments.
We have not reviewed 3AN in detail.
, Antagonistic Trends Between Binding Affinity and Drug-Likeness in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Inhibitors Revealed by Machine Learning, Viruses, doi:10.3390/v17070935
The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) is a validated therapeutic target for inhibiting viral replication. Few compounds have advanced clinically, underscoring the difficulty in optimizing both target affinity and drug-like properties. To address this challenge, we integrated machine learning (ML), molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the balance between pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in Mpro inhibitor design. We developed ML models to classify Mpro inhibitors based on experimental IC50 data, combining molecular descriptors with structural insights from MD simulations. Our Support Vector Machine (SVM) model achieved strong performance (training accuracy = 0.84, ROC AUC = 0.91; test accuracy = 0.79, ROC AUC = 0.86), while our Logistic Regression model (training accuracy = 0.78, ROC AUC = 0.85; test accuracy = 0.76, ROC AUC = 0.83). Notably, PK descriptors often exhibited opposing trends to binding affinity: hydrophilic features enhanced binding affinity but compromised PK properties, whereas hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, and π–π interactions in Mpro subsites S2 and S3/S4 are fundamental for binding affinity. Our findings highlight the need for a balanced approach in Mpro inhibitor design, strategically targeting these subsites may balance PD and PK properties. For the first time, we demonstrate antagonistic trends between pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) features through the integrated application of ML/MD. This study provides a computational framework for rational Mpro inhibitors, combining ML and MD to investigate the complex interplay between enzyme inhibition and drug likeness. These insights may guide the hit-to-lead optimization of the novel next-generation Mpro inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 with preclinical and clinical potential.