37C4 for COVID-19

c19early.org

COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence

COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets. c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research. Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US. In reality, many treatments reduce risk, with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.

Naso/oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection.
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.

37C4 may be beneficial for COVID-19 according to the study below. COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets. Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments. c19early.org analyzes 210+ treatments. We have not reviewed 37C4 in detail.

Study suggesting benefit with 37C4

Fausther-Bovendo et al., Rapid In Vivo Screening of Monoclonal Antibody Cocktails Using Hydrodynamic Delivery of DNA-Encoded Modified Antibodies, Biomedicines, doi:10.3390/biomedicines13030637

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are potent treatment options for infectious diseases. The rapid isolation and in vivo validation of therapeutic mAb candidates, including mAb cocktails, are essential to combat novel or rapidly mutating pathogens. The rapid selection and production of mAb candidates in sufficient amount and quality for preclinical studies are a major limiting step in the mAb development pipeline. Methods: Here, we developed a method to facilitate the screening of therapeutic mAbs in mouse models. Four conventional mAbs were transformed into single-chain variable fragments fused to the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of a human IgG1 (scFv-IgG). These scFv-IgG were expressed individually or as a cocktail in vitro and in mice following transfection or hydrodynamic delivery of the corresponding plasmids. Results: This method induced high expression of all scFv-IgG and provided protection in two murine infection models. Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of this approach for the rapid, low-cost screening of therapeutic mAb candidates.