Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Monoclonals
Mpro inhibitors
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Quercetin
RdRp inhibitors
TMPRSS2 inh.
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
 
Top
..
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchSelect treatment..Select..
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Thermotherapy Meta
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta

3,5-dihydroxy-7,3',4',5'-tetramethoxyflavone for COVID-19

3,5-dihydroxy-7,3',4',5'-tetramethoxyflavone has been reported as potentially beneficial for COVID-19 in the following study. We have not reviewed 3,5-dihydroxy-7,3',4',5'-tetramethoxyflavone in detail.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of over 200 viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets. Scientists have proposed over 10,000 potential treatments. c19early.org analyzes 170+ treatments.
Gyawali et al., Inhibition Potential of Quercetin Similar Compounds to SARS‐CoV‐2 Main Protease by High‐Throughput Virtual Screening, Molecular Simulations, ADMET Analysis, and DFT Studies, Chemistry & Biodiversity, doi:10.1002/cbdv.202501485
ABSTRACTThis study focused on in silico investigation of SARS‐CoV‐2 Mpro inhibitors screened from 6663 quercetin similar compounds. Two promising compounds, blumeatin B (L1) and 3,5‐dihydroxy‐7,3′,4′,5′‐tetramethoxyflavone (L2), were identified through machine learning based virtual screening and similarity analysis. They underwent molecular docking with Mpro and demonstrated strong interactions, with docking scores of −8.02 and −7.21 kcal/mol, respectively. Various parameters (RMSD, RMSF, Rg, SASA, and the number of hydrogen bonds) observed during 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation confirmed their stability. Principal component analysis (PCA) and dynamical cross‐correlation matrix (DCCM) revealed minimal conformational changes and strongly correlated motions in the protein. End‐state MM/GBSA free energy calculations for L1 and L2 with Mpro were −22.86 and −19.89 kcal/mol. Density functional theory (DFT) studies at the B3LYP/6‐311++G (d,p) level showed their polar nature, with electrophilicity index values exceeding 1.5 eV. The HOMO–LUMO energy gaps of L1 and L2 were 4.04 and 3.57 eV, aligning with the DOS spectra. Based on results from virtual screening, ADMET parameters, docking scores, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, MD simulation, end‐state free energy calculations, and DFT findings, L1 and L2 could be considered as promising SARS‐CoV‐2 Mpro inhibitors, requiring further experimental validation.
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Thanks for your feedback! Please search before submitting papers and note that studies are listed under the date they were first available, which may be the date of an earlier preprint.
Submit