Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All colchicine studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchColchicineColchicine (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Antihistamines Meta
Azvudine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Bromhexine Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis       

Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial

Dorward et al., British Journal of General Practice, doi:10.3399/BJGP.2022.0083 (date from preprint)
Sep 2021  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Mortality 70% Improvement Relative Risk Death/hospitalization -30% Death/hospitalization (b) 22% Recovery -6% Colchicine  Dorward et al.  LATE TREATMENT  RCT Is late treatment with colchicine beneficial for COVID-19? RCT 1,301 patients in the United Kingdom (March - May 2021) Lower mortality with colchicine (not stat. sig., p=0.43) c19early.org Dorward et al., British J. General Pra.., Sep 2021 Favorscolchicine Favorscontrol 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+
Colchicine for COVID-19
5th treatment shown to reduce risk in September 2020, now with p = 0.00000031 from 56 studies.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine treatments.
5,100+ studies for 109 treatments. c19early.org
Late treatment RCT with 156 colchicine patients in the UK, showing no significant differences. ISRCTN86534580.
risk of death, 69.7% lower, RR 0.30, p = 0.43, treatment 0 of 156 (0.0%), control 1 of 120 (0.8%), NNT 120, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm).
risk of death/hospitalization, 29.8% higher, RR 1.30, p = 0.66, treatment 6 of 156 (3.8%), control 4 of 133 (3.0%), odds ratio converted to relative risk, concurrent randomisation.
risk of death/hospitalization, 22.1% lower, RR 0.78, p = 0.59, treatment 6 of 156 (3.8%), control 119 of 1,145 (10.4%), odds ratio converted to relative risk, including control patients before the colchicine arm started.
risk of no recovery, 6.4% higher, HR 1.06, p = 0.67, treatment 156, control 133, inverted to make HR<1 favor treatment, time to alleviation of symptoms, concurrent randomisation.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Dorward et al., 23 Sep 2021, Randomized Controlled Trial, United Kingdom, peer-reviewed, 21 authors, study period 4 March, 2021 - 26 May, 2021, average treatment delay 6.0 days, dosage 0.5mg days 1-14.
This PaperColchicineAll
Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial
Jienchi Dorward, Ly-Mee Yu, Gail Hayward, Benjamin R Saville, Oghenekome Gbinigie, Oliver Van Hecke, Emma Ogburn, Philip H Evans, Nicholas Pb Thomas, Mahendra G Patel, Duncan Richards, Nicholas Berry, Michelle A Detry, Christina Saunders, Mark Fitzgerald, Victoria Harris, Milensu Shanyinde, Simon De Lusignan, Monique I Andersson, Christopher C Butler, Fd Richard Hobbs
British Journal of General Practice, doi:10.3399/bjgp.2022.0083
Background: Colchicine has been proposed as a COVID-19 treatment. Aim: To determine whether colchicine reduces time to recovery and COVID-19 related hospitalisations/deaths among people in the community. Design and setting: Prospective, multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled adaptive platform trial (PRINCIPLE). Method: Adults aged ≥65, or ≥18 years with comorbidities or shortness of breath, and unwell ≤14 days with suspected COVID-19 in the community were randomised to usual care, usual care plus colchicine (500µg daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and hospitalisation/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. The hypothesis for the time to recovery endpoint is evaluated first, and if superiority is declared on time to recovery, the hypothesis for the second co-primary endpoint of hospitalisation/death is then evaluated. To determine futility, we pre-specified a clinically meaningful benefit in time to first reported recovery as a hazard ratio of 1.2 or larger (equating to approximately 1.5 days benefit in the colchicine arm, assuming 9 days recovery in the usual care arm).
Strengths include the pragmatic design of the PRINCIPLE trial which allowed for efficient evaluation of the effectiveness of colchicine as an early, standalone intervention as it might be used in the community. We focused on patients at increased risk of complications and used routine electronic health records to confirm hospitalisation/death, and obtained primary outcome data on over 95% of participants. Although our primary analysis was restricted to SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, we conducted secondary analyses of the co-primary outcomes among patients with suspected COVID-19 but without PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, as limited SARS-CoV-2 testing may necessitate early empirical treatment in low resource settings. Furthermore, variation in PCR testing sensitivity, particularly if self-administered, means some participants will have had false negative tests.( 28 ) Time to recovery estimates were similar in the SARS-CoV-2 positive population, all participants irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 status, as well as the concurrent randomisation SARS-CoV-2 positive population (the latter populations are most analogous to those in traditional two arm trials). Although the sample size of the colchicine group in PRINCIPLE was relatively small, the Bayesian primary analysis model leverages previous enrolments in the usual care arm to increase the precision of estimates, which allow us to declare futility with high precision due to very low probability of a meaningful benefit of..
References
Beigel, Tomashek, Dodd, Mehta, Zingman et al., Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 -Final Report, N Engl J Med
Butler, Dorward, Yu, Gbinigie, Hayward et al., Azithromycin for community treatment of suspected COVID-19 in people at increased risk of an adverse clinical course in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial, The Lancet
Butler, Yu, Dorward, Gbinigie, Hayward et al., Doxycycline for community treatment of suspected COVID-19 in people at high risk of adverse outcomes in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Dalbeth, Lauterio, Wolfe, Mechanism of action of colchicine in the treatment of gout
Deftereos, Giannopoulos, Vrachatis, Siasos, Giotaki et al., Effect of Colchicine vs Standard Care on Cardiac and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The GRECCO-19 Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Network Open
Group, Horby, Lim, Emberson, Mafham et al., Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19, N Engl J Med
Horby, Campbell, Spata, Emberson, Staplin et al., Colchicine in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Investigators, Gordon, Mouncey, Al-Beidh, Rowan et al., Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19, N Engl J Med
Lopes, Bonjorno, Giannini, Amaral, Menezes et al., Beneficial effects of colchicine for moderate to severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, RMD Open
Patel, Dorward, Yu, Hobbs, Butler, Inclusion and diversity in the PRINCIPLE trial, The Lancet
Reyes, Hu, Teperman, Wampler Muskardin, Tardif et al., Anti-inflammatory therapy for COVID-19 infection: the case for colchicine, Ann Rheum Dis
Rodrigues, De Sá, Ishimoto, Becerra, Oliveira et al., Inflammasomes are activated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with COVID-19 severity in patients, J Exp Med
Rodriguez-Nava, Garcia, Yanez-Bello, Chung, Garcia et al., Atorvastatin associated with decreased hazard for death in COVID-19 patients admitted to an ICU: a retrospective cohort study, Critical Care
Scarsi, Piantoni, Colombo, Airo, Richini et al., Association between treatment with colchicine and improved survival in a single-centre cohort of adult hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, Ann Rheum Dis
Shi, Wang, Wang, Duan, Yang, Dyspnea rather than fever is a risk factor for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19, J Infect
Skipper, Pastick, Engen, Bangdiwala, Abassi et al., Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults With Early COVID-19 : A Randomized Trial, Ann Intern Med
Tardif, Bouabdallaoui, Allier, Gaudet, Shah et al., Colchicine for community-treated patients with COVID-19 (COLCORONA): a phase 3, randomised, double-blinded, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, Lancet Respir Med
Topp, Østergaard, Søndergaard, Bech, The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Verity, Okell, Dorigatti, Winskill, Whittaker et al., Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Woloshin, Patel, Kesselheim, False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection -Challenges and Implications, New England Journal of Medicine
Woodcock, Lavange, Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both, N Engl J Med
Yu, Bafadhel, Dorward, Hayward, Saville et al., Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial
{ 'indexed': {'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]], 'date-time': '2022-03-23T18:42:35Z', 'timestamp': 1648060955048}, 'reference-count': 0, 'publisher': 'Royal College of General Practitioners', 'content-domain': {'domain': [], 'crossmark-restriction': False}, 'short-container-title': ['Br J Gen Pract'], 'abstract': '<jats:p>Background: Colchicine has been proposed as a COVID-19 treatment. Aim: To determine ' 'whether colchicine reduces time to recovery and COVID-19 related hospitalisations/deaths ' 'among people in the community. Design and setting: Prospective, multicentre, open-label, ' 'multi-arm, randomised, controlled adaptive platform trial (PRINCIPLE). Method: Adults aged ' '≥65, or ≥18 years with comorbidities or shortness of breath, and unwell ≤14 days with ' 'suspected COVID-19 in the community were randomised to usual care, usual care plus colchicine ' '(500μg daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints ' 'were time to first self-reported recovery, and hospitalisation/death related to COVID-19, ' 'within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. The hypothesis for the time to recovery ' 'endpoint is evaluated first, and if superiority is declared on time to recovery, the ' 'hypothesis for the second co-primary endpoint of hospitalisation/death is then evaluated. To ' 'determine futility, we pre-specified a clinically meaningful benefit in time to first ' 'reported recovery as a hazard ratio of 1.2 or larger (equating to approximately 1.5 days ' 'benefit in the colchicine arm, assuming 9 days recovery in the usual care arm). Results: The ' 'trial opened on April 2, 2020, with randomisation to colchicine from March 04, 2021 until May ' '26, 2021, after the pre-specified time to recovery futility criterion was met. The primary ' 'analysis model included 2755 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants, randomised to colchicine ' '(n=156), usual care (n=1145), and other treatments (n=1454). Time to first self-reported ' 'recovery was similar in the colchicine group compared with usual care with an estimated ' 'hazard ratio of 0·919 [95% credible interval 0·72 to 1·16] and an estimated increase of 1.4 ' 'days in median time to self-reported recovery for colchicine versus usual care. The ' 'probability of meaningful benefit in time to recovery was very low at 1.8%. Results were ' 'similar in comparisons with concurrent controls. COVID-19 related hospitalisations/deaths ' 'were similar in the colchicine group versus usual care, with an estimated odds ratio of 0·76 ' '[0·28 to 1·89] and an estimated difference of 0.4% [-2.4 to 2.7%]. One serious adverse event ' 'occurred in the colchicine group and two in usual care. Conclusions: Colchicine did not ' 'improve time to recovery in people at higher risk of complications with COVID-19 in the ' 'community. Trial registration: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ' 'ext-link-type="isrctn" xlink:href="86534580">ISRCTN86534580</jats:ext-link>.</jats:p>', 'DOI': '10.3399/bjgp.2022.0083', 'type': 'journal-article', 'created': {'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]], 'date-time': '2022-03-23T18:25:12Z', 'timestamp': 1648059912000}, 'page': 'BJGP.2022.0083', 'source': 'Crossref', 'is-referenced-by-count': 0, 'title': [ 'Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive ' 'platform trial'], 'prefix': '10.3399', 'author': [ { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-1430', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Jienchi', 'family': 'Dorward', 'sequence': 'first', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Ly-mee', 'family': 'Yu', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0852-627X', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Gail', 'family': 'Hayward', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Benjamin', 'family': 'Saville', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-4491', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Oghenekome Abisoye', 'family': 'Gbinigie', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Oliver', 'family': 'van Hecke', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Emma', 'family': 'Ogburn', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5277-3545', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Philip Hugh', 'family': 'Evans', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Nicholas', 'family': 'Thomas', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Mahendra', 'family': 'Patel', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Duncan B', 'family': 'Richards', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Nicholas', 'family': 'Berry', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Christina T', 'family': 'Saunders', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Michelle A', 'family': 'Detry', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Mark', 'family': 'Fitzgerald', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Victoria', 'family': 'Harris', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Milensu', 'family': 'Shanyinde', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-2641', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Simon', 'family': 'de Lusignan', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, {'given': 'Monique I', 'family': 'Andersson', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-3453', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'Christopher C.', 'family': 'Butler', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}, { 'ORCID': 'http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-7172', 'authenticated-orcid': False, 'given': 'FD Richard', 'family': 'Hobbs', 'sequence': 'additional', 'affiliation': []}], 'member': '1987', 'published-online': {'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]]}, 'container-title': ['British Journal of General Practice'], 'original-title': [], 'language': 'en', 'link': [ { 'URL': 'https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0083', 'content-type': 'unspecified', 'content-version': 'vor', 'intended-application': 'similarity-checking'}], 'deposited': { 'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]], 'date-time': '2022-03-23T18:25:12Z', 'timestamp': 1648059912000}, 'score': 1, 'resource': {'primary': {'URL': 'http://bjgp.org/lookup/doi/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0083'}}, 'subtitle': [], 'short-title': [], 'issued': {'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]]}, 'references-count': 0, 'alternative-id': ['10.3399/BJGP.2022.0083'], 'URL': 'http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2022.0083', 'relation': {}, 'ISSN': ['0960-1643', '1478-5242'], 'issn-type': [{'value': '0960-1643', 'type': 'print'}, {'value': '1478-5242', 'type': 'electronic'}], 'subject': ['Family Practice'], 'published': {'date-parts': [[2022, 3, 23]]}}
Late treatment
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit