Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All exercise studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchExerciseExercise (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Mortality 30% Improvement Relative Risk Ventilation 20% ICU admission 10% Exercise for COVID-19  Pinto et al.  Prophylaxis Does physical activity reduce risk for COVID-19? Prospective study in Brazil (June - October 2020) Lower mortality (p=0.27) and ventilation (p=0.21), not sig. c19early.org Pinto et al., J. Sport and Health Scie.., Aug 2021 Favors exercise Favors inactivity

No independent associations between physical activity and clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19

Pinto et al., Journal of Sport and Health Science, doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.08.001, NCT04449718
Aug 2021  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
Exercise for COVID-19
9th treatment shown to reduce risk in October 2020
 
*, now known with p < 0.00000000001 from 66 studies.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
4,000+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19early.org
Prospective analysis of 209 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, showing no significant difference in COVID-19 outcomes with physical activity. Mortality, ventilation, and ICU results are only provided for activity as a continuous variable.
risk of death, 30.0% lower, OR 0.70, p = 0.27, RR approximated with OR.
risk of mechanical ventilation, 20.0% lower, OR 0.80, p = 0.21, RR approximated with OR.
risk of ICU admission, 10.0% lower, OR 0.90, p = 0.46, RR approximated with OR.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Pinto et al., 12 Aug 2021, prospective, Brazil, peer-reviewed, survey, 10 authors, study period 2 June, 2020 - 7 October, 2020, trial NCT04449718 (history). Contact: gualano@usp.br.
This PaperExerciseAll
No independent associations between physical activity and clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19
Ana J Pinto, Karla F Goessler, Alan L Fernandes, Igor H Murai, Lucas P Sales, Bruna Z Reis, Mayara Diniz Santos, Hamilton Roschel, Rosa M R Pereira, Bruno Gualano
Journal of Sport and Health Science, doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.08.001
Background: Regular physical activity (PA) has been postulated to improve, or at least maintain, immunity across the life span. However, the link between physical (in)activity and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains to be established. This small-scale prospective cohort study is nested within a randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the possible associations between PA levels and clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (mean age: 54.9 years) were recruited from the Clinical Hospital of the School of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo (a quaternary referral teaching hospital) and from Ibirapuera Field Hospital, both located in Sao Paulo, Brazil. PA level was assessed using the Baecke Questionnaire of Habitual Physical Activity. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. The secondary outcomes were mortality, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mechanical ventilation requirement. Results: The median hospital length of stay was 7.0 § 4.0 days, median § IQR; 3.3% of patients died, 13.8% were admitted to the ICU, and 8.6% required mechanical ventilation. Adjusted linear regression models showed that PA indices were not associated with hospital length of stay (work index: b = À0.57 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): À1.80 to 0.65), p = 0.355; sport index: b = 0.43 (95%CI: À0.94 to 1.80), p = 0.536; leisure-time index: b = 1.18 (95%CI: À0.22 to 2.59), p = 0.099; and total activity index: b = 0.20 (95%CI: À0.48 to 0.87), p = 0.563). None of the PA indices were associated with mortality, admission to the ICU, or mechanical ventilation requirement (all p > 0.050). Conclusion: Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, PA did not independently associate with hospital length of stay or any other clinically relevant outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as meaning that, among already hospitalized patients with more severe forms of COVID-19, being active is a potential protective factor likely outweighed by a cluster of comorbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes, hypertension, weight excess) and older age, suggesting that the benefit of PA against the worsening of COVID-19 may vary across stages of the disease.
Authors' contributions AJP participated in conception and design, participants' recruitment, data collection, analysis and interpretation, statistical analysis, and manuscript writing; KFG participated in conception and design, participants' recruitment, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript revision; ALF, IHM, LPS, BZR, and MDS, participated in participants' recruitment, data collection, and manuscript revision; HR participated in data analysis and interpretation, statistical analysis, and manuscript revision; RMRP participated in data analysis and interpretation, obtaining funding, and manuscript revision; BG participated in conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, obtaining funding, and manuscript writing. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Damiot, Pinto, Turner, Gualano, Immunological implications of physical inactivity among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, Gerontology
De Souza, Motta-Santos, Soares, Association of physical activity levels and the prevalence of COVID-19-associated hospitalization, J Sci Med Sport
Ek, Kallings, Ekstrom, Borjesson, Ekblom, Subjective reports of physical activity levels and sedentary time prior to hospital admission can predict utilization of hospital care and all-cause mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease, Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs
Falagas, Kompoti, Obesity and infection, Lancet Infect Dis
Hamer, 'donovan, Stamatakis, Lifestyle risk factors, obesity and infectious disease mortality in the general population: Linkage study of 97,844 adults from England and Scotland, Prev Med
Hamer, Kivimaki, Gale, Batty, Lifestyle risk factors, inflammatory mechanisms, and COVID-19 hospitalization: A community-based cohort study of 387,109 adults in UK, Brain Behav Immun
Joffe, Gambhir, Chadeau-Hyam, Vineis, Causal diagrams in systems epidemiology, Emerg Themes Epidemiol, doi:10.1186/1742-7622-9-1
Murai, Fernandes, Sales, Effect of a single high dose of vitamin d3 on hospital length of stay in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial, JAMA
Robins, Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference, Epidemiology
Salgado-Aranda, Erez-Castellano, Uñez-Gil, Influence of baseline physical activity as a modifying factor on COVID-19 mortality: A single-center, retrospective study, Infect Dis Ther
Sallis, Young, Tartof, Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes: A study in 48,440 adult patients, Br J Sports Med
Simpson, Campbell, Gleeson, Can exercise affect immune function to increase susceptibility to infection?, Exerc Immunol Rev
Woolcott, Ashe, Miller, Shi, Marra et al., Does physical activity reduce seniors' need for healthcare? A study of 24,281 Canadians, Br J Sports Med
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit