ZINC000103666966 for COVID-19
c19early.org
COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets.
c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research.
Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US.
In reality, many treatments reduce risk,
with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.
-
Naso/
oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection. -
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
-
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
-
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
-
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
-
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
-
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
-
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
-
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.
ZINC000103666966 may be beneficial for
COVID-19 according to the study below.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets.
Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments.
c19early.org analyzes
210+ treatments.
We have not reviewed ZINC000103666966 in detail.
, In silico prediction of the animal susceptibility and virtual screening of natural compounds against SARS-CoV-2: Molecular dynamics simulation based analysis, Frontiers in Genetics, doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.906955
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It has six open reading frames (orf1ab, orf3a, orf6, orf7a, orf8, and orf10), a spike protein, a membrane protein, an envelope small membrane protein, and a nucleocapsid protein, out of which, orf1ab is the largest ORF coding different important non-structural proteins. In this study, an effort was made to evaluate the susceptibility of different animals against SARS-CoV-2 by analyzing the interactions of Spike and ACE2 proteins of the animals and propose a list of potential natural compounds binding to orf1ab of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we analyzed structural interactions between spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and the ACE2 receptor of 16 different hosts. A simulation for 50 ns was performed on these complexes. Based on post-simulation analysis, Chelonia mydas was found to have a more stable complex, while Bubalus bubalis, Aquila chrysaetos chrysaetos, Crocodylus porosus, and Loxodonta africana were found to have the least stable complexes with more fluctuations than all other organisms. Apart from that, we performed domain assignment of orf1ab of SARS-CoV-2 and identified 14 distinct domains. Out of these, Domain 3 (DNA/RNA polymerases) was selected as a target, as it showed no similarities with host proteomes and was validated in silico. Then, the top 10 molecules were selected from the virtual screening of ∼1.8 lakh molecules from the ZINC database, based on binding energy, and validated for ADME and toxicological properties. Three molecules were selected and analyzed further. The structural analysis showed that these molecules were residing within the pocket of the receptor. Finally, a simulation for 200 ns was performed on complexes with three selected molecules. Based on post-simulation analysis (RMSD, RMSF, Rg, SASA, and energies), the molecule ZINC000103666966 was found as the most suitable inhibitory compound against Domain 3. As this is an in silico prediction, further experimental studies could unravel the potential of the proposed molecule against SARS-CoV-2.