Dulaglutide for COVID-19
c19early.org
COVID-19 Treatment Clinical Evidence
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets.
c19early analyzes 6,000+ studies for 210+ treatments—over 17 million hours of research.
Only three high-profit early treatments are approved in the US.
In reality, many treatments reduce risk,
with 25 low-cost treatments approved across 163 countries.
-
Naso/
oropharyngeal treatment Effective Treatment directly to the primary source of initial infection. -
Healthy lifestyles Protective Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
-
Immune support Effective Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
-
Thermotherapy Effective Methods for increasing internal body temperature, enhancing immune system function.
-
Systemic agents Effective Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses.
-
High-profit systemic agents Conditional Effective, but with greater access and cost barriers.
-
Monoclonal antibodies Limited Utility Effective but rarely used—high cost, variant dependence, IV/SC admin.
-
Acetaminophen Harmful Increased risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
-
Remdesivir Harmful Increased mortality with longer followup. Increased kidney and liver injury, cardiac disorders.
Dulaglutide may be beneficial for
COVID-19 according to the study below.
COVID-19 involves the interplay of 400+ viral and host proteins and factors providing many therapeutic targets.
Scientists have proposed 11,000+ potential treatments.
c19early.org analyzes
210+ treatments.
We have not reviewed dulaglutide in detail.
, 768-P: Effect of Dulaglutide Therapy Initiation on the Course of Coronavirus Infection and the Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetes, doi:10.2337/db23-768-P
Aim: To determine the impact of initiation of dulaglutide therapy on the course of COVID-19 and the dynamics of inflammatory markers in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The inclusion criteria were history of T2DM, BMI > 27 kg/m2, PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. The intervention group of 53 patients started dulaglutide therapy (1.5 mg once weekly) during the first 24 hours of admission, the control group consisted of 50 patients, who proceeded with glucose-lowering therapy. In both groups we compared COVID-19 outcomes (mortality/survival rate, ICU admission, need for assisted ventilation) and the duration of hospitalization. On days 3 and 7 of hospitalization we assessed laboratory parameters (FPG, CRP, ALT, AST, LDH, lymphocyte levels, D-dimer). Results: The initiation of dulaglutide therapy reduced the risk of death and transfer to assisted ventilation by 3.5 times in the intervention group compared to the control one (5.7% vs 20.0%, p=0.038). No differences were found in the risk of ICU admission (17.0% vs 28.0%, p=0.18) and the duration of hospitalization (10 bed-days vs 11-bed days, p=0.26). The groups were comparable in respect to carbohydrate metabolic compensation. Compared to those in the control group, patients on dulaglutide therapy demonstrated a lower CRP level (15.8 vs 24.6 mg/L, p=0.035), higher lymphocyte levels (1.2 vs 0.9 × 10*9/L, p=0.049) on day 3 of hospitalization, and a significantly lower LDH concentration level on day 7 (261.6 vs 326.1 U/L, p=0.016). There were no differences in ALT, AST, and D-dimer levels. Conclusion: The initiation of dulaglutide therapy in hospitalized patients with T2DM and COVID-19 decreased the risk of lethal outcomes and transfer to assisted ventilation, as well as proved effective in regards to inflammatory markers (CRP, lymphocytes levels). Disclosure T.Markova: None. M.Stas: None. A.Anchutina: None.