Conv. Plasma
Nigella Sativa
Peg.. Lambda

All famotidine studies
Meta analysis
study COVID-19 treatment researchFamotidineFamotidine (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Bromhexine Meta Metformin Meta
Budesonide Meta
Cannabidiol Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta
Curcumin Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Ensovibep Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Peg.. Lambda Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Remdesivir Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Lactoferrin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis   Recent:  
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Severe case -34% Improvement Relative Risk Famotidine for COVID-19  Cheung et al.  Prophylaxis Is prophylaxis with famotidine beneficial for COVID-19? Retrospective 952 patients in China No significant difference in severe cases Cheung et al., Gastroenterology, April 2021 Favors famotidine Favors control

Association Between Famotidine Use and COVID-19 Severity in Hong Kong: A Territory-wide Study

Cheung et al., Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.098
Apr 2021  
  Source   PDF   All Studies   Meta AnalysisMeta
Retrospective 952 COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong, showing no significant difference in severe disease with famotidine use.
risk of severe case, 34.0% higher, OR 1.34, p = 0.72, treatment 23, control 929, adjusted per study, multivariable, RR approximated with OR.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Cheung et al., 30 Apr 2021, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 3 authors.
All Studies   Meta Analysis   Submit Updates or Corrections
This PaperFamotidineAll
Yun Qiu, Nian-Di Tan, Ren Mao
Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.01.017
The pooled prevalence of digestive symptoms was 12%-15%, 9,10 with nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, and loss of appetite being the 3 most common symptoms. The geographical disparities also exist for the prevalence of GI symptoms and liver injury as reported by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute publication that digestive involvement was more prevalent outside China. 5, 11 As for the association between GI involvement and the severity of COVID-19, according to our meta-analysis, 9 patients with GI involvement tended to have a poorer disease course. Our preliminary finding has been confirmed by subsequent studies. 12, 13 This might be ascribed to the fact that even after the virus has been cleared from the respiratory system, it can persist in the gut of some patients for several days ( 47 days), which leads to a high level of virus and longer lasting disease. 9 In conclusion, current evidence supports continued use of ACEI/ARBs in COVID-19 patients with hypertension. As an important clinical feature in patients with COVID-19, digestive symptoms should be treated with caution in the early stage of COVID-19, and dynamic monitoring of liver function is imperative during clinical practice to reduce the complications and mortality of COVID-19.
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts. This letter is in reference to the study by Freedberg et al 1 recently published in Gastroenterology. This retrospective analysis of an inpatient cohort admitted to 2 hospitals in New York found that patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated with famotidine exhibited a lower risk of death or mechanical ventilation as composite outcomes over a 30-day period. The study was based on computational modelling, which proposed famotidine might inhibit viral replication through direct interaction with the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease, 2 and was also preceded by a small, short-term follow-up, outpatient study suggesting that famotidine use was associated with symptomatic improvement. 3 However, the current study published in Gastroenterology provides additional value because the previous cohort was much smaller in number, included patients without a proven COVID-19 diagnosis, and lacked a control group. The current study by Freedberg et al 1 brings a few questions to mind, which we hope the authors can answer. In the conclusions, the authors stated, "The study was premised on the assumption that use of famotidine represented a continuation of home use." In the Results section, they also say, "Home use of famotidine was documented on admission medication reconciliation in 15% of those who used famotidine while hospitalized." These points bring up a few questions. Does this..
Alhazzani, None, Intensive Care Med
Baral, None, Curr Atheroscler Rep
Cannata, None, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
Chan, None, Hypertension
Cheung, None, World J Gastroenterol
Freedberg, None, Gastroenterology
Kumar, None, BMJ Open Gastroenterol
Mao, None, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Mehra, None, N Engl J Med
Mehra, None, N Engl J Med
Parasa, None, JAMA Netw Open
Parigi, None, Gastroenterology
Patoulias, None, Curr Hypertens Rep
Sultan, None, Gastroenterology
Tsibouris, None, Ann Gastroenterol
Vaduganathan, None, N Engl J Med
Wu, None, Acta Pharm Sin B
Zhang, None, Pharmacol Res
Zhang, None, Pharmacol Res
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of over 100,000 datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Vaccines and treatments are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop