Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Azvudine
Bromhexine
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Famotidine
Favipiravir
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Molnupiravir
Monoclonals
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
Paxlovid
Quercetin
Remdesivir
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
Top
Results
Abstract
All sleep studies
Meta analysis
 
Feedback
Home
next
study
previous
study
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchSleepSleep (more..)
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta
Azvudine Meta
Bromhexine Meta Molnupiravir Meta
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Curcumin Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Famotidine Meta Paxlovid Meta
Favipiravir Meta Quercetin Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Remdesivir Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta Thermotherapy Meta
Ivermectin Meta

All Studies   Meta Analysis    Recent:   
0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ Case 66% Improvement Relative Risk Sleep for COVID-19  Wang et al.  Prophylaxis Is better sleep beneficial for COVID-19? Retrospective study in China (January - January 2020) Fewer cases with higher quality sleep (p=0.0000072) c19early.org Wang et al., Sleep Medicine: X, December 2020 Favors good sleep Favors control

Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: a retrospective study of a nosocomial outbreak

Wang et al., Sleep Medicine: X, doi:10.1016/j.sleepx.2020.100028
Dec 2020  
  Post
  Facebook
Share
  Source   PDF   All   Meta
Sleep for COVID-19
15th treatment shown to reduce risk in March 2021
 
*, now known with p = 0.0000000019 from 15 studies.
Lower risk for mortality, hospitalization, and cases.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine complementary and synergistic treatments. * >10% efficacy in meta analysis with ≥3 clinical studies.
4,100+ studies for 60+ treatments. c19early.org
Retrospective 118 healthcare workers in China, showing higher risk of COVID-19 with poor sleep quality.
This study is excluded in meta analysis: results only provided with respect to continuous values.
risk of case, 66.3% lower, HR 0.34, p < 0.001, inverted to make HR<1 favor higher quality sleep, Cox proportional hazards, model 2.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Wang et al., 31 Dec 2020, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, survey, mean age 19.0, 14 authors, study period 6 January, 2020 - 8 January, 2020. Contact: hyzhao750@sina.com, baiyansen6@hust.edu.cn.
This PaperSleepAll
Risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: a retrospective study of a nosocomial outbreak
Xuan Wang, Xiaobing Jiang, Qimin Huang, Han Wang, David Gurarie, Martial Ndeffo-Mbah, Fei Fan, Peng Fu, Mary Ann Horn, Anirban Mondal, Charles King, Shuai Xu, Hongyang Zhao, Yansen Bai
Sleep Medicine: X, doi:10.1016/j.sleepx.2020.100028
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at the forefront of fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they are at high risk of acquiring the pathogen from infected patients and transmitting to other HCWs. We aimed to investigate risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 infection among HCWs in a non-COVID-19 hospital yard. Methods: Retrospective data collection on demographics, lifestyles, contact status with infected subjects for 118 HCWs (including 12 COVID-19 HCWs) at Union Hospital of Wuhan, China. Sleep quality and working pressure were evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and The Nurse Stress Index (NSI), respectively. The follow-up duration was from Dec 25, 2019, to Feb 15, 2020. Results: A high proportion of COVID-19 HCWs had engaged in night shift-work (75.0% vs. 40.6%) and felt working under pressure (66.7% vs. 32.1%) than uninfected HCWs. SARS-CoV-2 infected HCWs had significantly higher scores of PSQI and NSI than uninfected HCWs (P < 0.001). Specifically, scores of 5 factors (sleep quality, sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disorder, and daytime dysfunction) in PSQI were higher among infected HCWs. For NSI, its 5 subscales (nursing profession and work, workload and time allocation, working environment and resources, patient care, management and interpersonal relations) were all higher in infected than uninfected nurse. Furthermore, total scores of PSQI (HR ¼ 2.97, 95% CI ¼ 1.86À4.76; P <0.001) and NSI (HR ¼ 4.67, 95%CI ¼ 1.42À15.45; P ¼ 0.011) were both positively associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that poor sleep quality and higher working pressure may increase the risk of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs.
Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the institutional ethics board of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (No. 20200029), and all participants provided their informed consent. Consent for publication Consent for publication had been obtained from all studied participants. Credit author statement Xuan Wang; Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing -original draft, Xiaobing Jiang; Supervision, Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The ICMJE Uniform Disclosure Form for Potential Conflicts of Interest associated with this article can be viewed by clicking on the following link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleepx.2020.100028. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleepx.2020.100028.
References
Bardhan, Heaton, Davis, A cross sectional study evaluating psychosocial job stress and health risk in emergency department nurses, Int J Environ Res Publ Health, doi:10.3390/ijerph16183243
Bartoszko, Farooqi, Alhazzani, Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, Influenza Other Respir Viruses, doi:10.1111/irv.12745
Besedovsky, Lange, Haack, The sleep-immune crosstalk in health and disease, Physiol Rev, doi:10.1152/physrev.00010.2018
Buysse, Reynolds 3rd, Monk, The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research, Psychiatr Res, doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
Chen, Liang, Li, Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak, Lancet Psychiatry, doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30078-x
Gold, Covid-19: adverse mental health outcomes for healthcare workers, BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.m1815
Huang, Huo, Ruan, Optimal control of environmental cleaning and antibiotic prescription in an epidemiological model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitals, Math Biosci, doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2019.01.013
Jr, The adverse effects of psychological stress on immunoregulatory balance: applications to human inflammatory diseases, Immunol Allergy Clin, doi:10.1016/j.iac.2010.09.013
Lancet, COVID-19: protecting health-care workers, Lancet, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30644-9
Mullen, Mengozzi, Hanschmann, How the redox state regulates immunity, Free Radic Biol Med, doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.022
Pamela, James, The nursing stress scale: development of an instrument, J Behav Assess, doi:10.1007/BF01321348
Prather, Leung, Association of insufficient sleep with respiratory infection among adults in the United States, JAMA Intern Med, doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0787
Ran, Chen, Wang, Risk factors of healthcare workers with corona virus disease 2019: a retrospective cohort study in a designated hospital of Wuhan in China, Clin Infect Dis, doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa287
Salgado, Farr, Hall, Influenza in the acute hospital setting, Lancet Infect Dis, doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00221-9
Shen, Zou, Zhong, Psychological stress of ICU nurses in the time of COVID-19, Crit Care, doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02926-2
Skowronski, Astell, Brunham, Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a year in review, Annu Rev Med, doi:10.1146/annurev.med.56.091103.134135
Wang, Jiang, Huang, None, Sleep Medicine: X
Wang, Xie, Xu, Sleep disturbances among medical workers during the outbreak of COVID-2019, Occup Med, doi:10.1093/occmed/kqaa074
Wang, Zhou, He, Nosocomial outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China, Eur Respir J, doi:10.1183/13993003.00544-2020
Loading..
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 100,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. FLCCC and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Submit