Association between ramelteon and 30-day mortality in ICU patients with COVID-19: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

Tian et al., British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, doi:10.1002/bcp.70099, May 2025

Melatonin for COVID-19

25th treatment shown to reduce risk in May 2021, now with p = 0.000000015 from 18 studies.

No treatment is 100% effective.
Protocols combine treatments.

PSM retrospective 1,066 ICU patients in China, showing significantly lower mortality with ramelteon treatment.
Standard of Care (SOC) for COVID-19 in the study country, China, is average with moderate efficacy for approved treatments1.
OutcomeImprovementEffect · pTreatmentControl
risk of death 47.0% lower · HR 0.53 · p = 0.005** 47.0% lowerHR 0.53p = 0.005** 301 301 treatment 301, control 301adjusted per studypropensity score matchingmultivariableramelteon

Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates. ** p < 0.01

Tian et al., 19 May 2025, retrospective, China, peer-reviewed, 3 authors.
$0 $500 $1,000+ Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19 treatment protocols c19early.org November 2026 China Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Myanmar South Africa Peru Philippines USA Brazil France Italy Canada Pakistan Spain Vietnam Japan Nepal Iran Bangladesh Ethiopia Ghana Germany Mexico South Korea United Kingdom Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland Thailand Uganda Egypt Nigeria Taiwan Fiji Zambia Bosnia-Herzegovina Dominican Republic Bolivia Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Togo Bulgaria Greece Slovakia Iceland New Zealand Trinidad and Tobago Mongolia Czechia Belarus Israel Haiti North Macedonia Hong Kong Qatar Panama Serbia Benin Burundi Cameroon CAR China favored low-cost treatments.The average efficacy of treatments was moderate.Low-cost treatments improve early treatment, andprovide complementary/synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
$0 $500 $1,000+ Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19treatment protocols worldwide c19early.org November 2026 China Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Myanmar South Africa Peru Philippines USA Brazil France Italy Canada Pakistan Spain Vietnam Japan Iran Bangladesh Ethiopia Ghana Germany Mexico South Korea United Kingdom Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland Thailand Uganda Egypt Nigeria Taiwan Fiji Zambia Dominican Rep. Bolivia Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Togo Sri Lanka Bulgaria Greece Slovakia New Zealand Trinidad and Tobago Mongolia Czechia Belarus Israel North Macedonia Hong Kong Qatar Panama Serbia Benin Burundi CAR Syria China favored low-cost treatments.The average efficacy was moderate.Low-cost protocols improve early treatment,and add complementary/synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
Late treatment
is less effective