Aspirin for COVID-19: real-time meta-analysis of 79 studies (Version 70)
, Feb 2026
Significantly lower risk is seen for mortality and progression. 28 studies from 26 independent teams in 11 countries show significant benefit.
Meta-analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 8% [2‑13%] lower risk. Early treatment is more effective than late treatment.
Control Aspirin
Studies to date do not show a significant benefit for mechanical ventilation and ICU admission. Benefit may be more likely without coadministered anticoagulants. The RECOVERY RCT shows 4% [-4‑11%] lower mortality for all patients, however when restricting to non-LMWH patients there was 17% [-4‑34%] improvement, comparable with the mortality results of all studies, 8% [2‑14%], and the 16% improvement in the REMAP-CAP RCT.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine safe and effective options with individual risk/benefit analysis and monitoring. Other treatments are more effective. All data and sources to reproduce this analysis are in the appendix.
4 other meta-analyses show significant improvements with aspirin for mortality1-3, mechanical ventilation1, and progression4.
4 meta-analyses show significant improvements with aspirin for mortality1-3,
mechanical ventilation1, and
progression4.
1.
Banaser et al., A systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy of low dose aspirin on the management of COVID-19, International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries, doi:10.24911/IJMDC.51-1640383699.
2.
Srinivasan et al., Aspirin use is associated with decreased inpatient mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis, American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice, doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100191.
Covid Analysis et al., Feb 2026, preprint, 1 author.